- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06086223
Functional Outcomes Following Ankle Fracture Fixation With or Without Ankle Arthroscopy
Functional Outcomes Following Ankle Fracture Fixation With or Without Ankle Arthroscopy: Randomized Control Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Acute ankle fracture is one of the commonest fractures of the lower limb. Anatomical reduction and stable fixation remain the main surgical treatment for unstable ankle fractures . However, its final outcomes are not as good as expected . Fracture malunion, failure to address the disrupted syndesmosis and associated ligamentous or chondral lesions can be reasons for poor surgical outcome.
1-mm of lateral talar shift lead to a 42% increase in contact stress, so the anatomic reduction is critical to the long-term integrity of the joint . It is difficult to assess 1 to 2 mm of mal-reduction with C-arm fluoroscopy. The best assessment of the syndesmotic reduction is performed with axial CT imaging of the ankle.
Ankle arthroscopy is expected to be a more sensitive tool for syndesmotic disruption diagnosis and other intra-articular pathologies and as a guide for anatomical reduction of the syndesmosis . Several studies have reported the incidence of chondral lesions seen during ankle arthroscopy at the time of ankle fracture ORIF, but those studies report the role of arthroscopy as a diagnostic or predictive tool for patient outcome. Very few studies have discussed the rates of arthroscopic intervention, the procedures performed, and the association of these procedures with patient final functional outcomes .
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: El-Taher Alaa Eldin Ahmed Eid, assisstant lecturer
- Phone Number: 01004859149
- Email: taheralaa92@gmail.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients ≥16 years of age who will be managed operatively for:
- rotational ankle fracture Danis-Weber classification B or C fibula fracture
- fracture dislocation ankle
- Fractures extending into the tibial plafond,
- Talus fractures (body or neck) in our institution
Exclusion Criteria:
Pediatric fractures, Polytrauma patients, Fractures managed with closed-contact casting and, patients with lost follow up during this study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: those patients who will go for ORIF plus arthroscopy
we will start with a standard ankle arthroscopy. A leg holder and ankle joint distractor will be used. We will start with the anteromedial portal and introduce the 4-mm scope into the ankle joint. Next, under direct visualization, and taking care to preserve any branches of the superficial peroneal nerve, we will perform the anterolateral portal. We will carry out a standard diagnostic ankle arthroscopy to evaluate the ankle cartilage, wash intra-articular haematoma, identify, and remove any intra-articular fracture fragments and loose bodies, perform dynamic ligamentous stress examinations while directly visualizing the syndesmosis, the deltoid ligament, and the lateral collateral ligament. Following fracture fixation, arthroscopy will be also used as a second look to evaluate the quality of both articular and syndesmotic reduction, perform any needed arthroscopic intervention for deltoid ligament injury or management of chondral lesions (OCLs) |
we will go for fixation of the fracture with association of scope intervention pre and post fixation
Other Names:
|
Experimental: patients who will go for ORIF without arthroscopy
|
we will go for fixation of the fracture alone with no scope intervention
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society(AOFAS) hindfoot score
Time Frame: 6 months and one year follow up
|
AOFAS hindfoot score difference between the 2 groups at 6 months and one year postoperatively from 0 to 100 where higher value indicates better functional outcomes
|
6 months and one year follow up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Smith KS, Drexelius K, Challa S, Moon DK, Metzl JA, Hunt KJ. Outcomes Following Ankle Fracture Fixation With or Without Ankle Arthroscopy. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2020 Mar 2;5(1):2473011420904046. doi: 10.1177/2473011420904046. eCollection 2020 Jan.
- Zengerink M, Struijs PA, Tol JL, van Dijk CN. Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Feb;18(2):238-46. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-0942-6. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Arthroscopy for ankle fracture
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ankle Injuries
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationCompleted
-
Oregon State UniversityTerminatedNeural Inhibition | Injuries, AnkleUnited States
-
Georgia State UniversityNational Athletic Trainers' Association Research & Education Foundation (NATA...CompletedChronic Ankle Instability | Ankle Sprains | Ankle RehabilitationUnited States
-
Direction Centrale du Service de Santé des ArméesRecruiting
-
MTI UniversityCairo UniversityCompleted
-
Sport and Spine Rehab Clinical Research FoundationCompletedAnkle SprainsUnited States
-
University of NebraskaWithdrawnAnkle Sprains | Ankle Injuries and Disorders
-
Petr RoutnerRecruitingAnkle Injuries | Ankle Fractures | Ankle Sprains | Ankle Edema | Ankle ImpingementCzechia
-
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)Not yet recruiting
-
Naveen PoonaiNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on ankle arthroscopy with ORIF
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteRecruitingAnkle Fractures | Pilon FractureCanada
-
Maasstad HospitalErasmus Medical Center; Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...CompletedDistal Radius FractureNetherlands
-
Duke UniversityCompletedOsteochondral Lesions of TalusUnited States
-
University of MinnesotaNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) and other collaboratorsCompletedFemoral Neck FracturesUnited States
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamCompletedCalcaneus FracturesUnited States
-
Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteRecruitingHip DysplasiaCanada, United States
-
Assiut UniversityRecruitingOpen Type III (A&B)Pediatric and Adolescent Tibial Shaft Fractures | Ilizarov FixationEgypt
-
PT. Prodia Stem Cell IndonesiaRecruitingOsteoarthritis, KneeIndonesia
-
Prisma Health-UpstateIndiana University; Orthopaedic Trauma AssociationCompletedHigh Energy Midshaft Clavicle FracturesUnited States
-
Zimmer BiometMedical Metrics Diagnostics, Inc; MedNet SolutionsCompletedOsteoarthritis | Knee Osteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis, Knee | Bone Marrow Edema | Knee Pain ChronicUnited States, Canada