Functional Outcomes Following Ankle Fracture Fixation With or Without Ankle Arthroscopy

October 13, 2023 updated by: El-Taher Alaa Eldin Ahmed Eid, Assiut University

Functional Outcomes Following Ankle Fracture Fixation With or Without Ankle Arthroscopy: Randomized Control Study

The aim of our study is to identify if there is statistically significant difference in patient reported functional outcomes in cases of unstable ankle fracture managed by ORIF with and without ankle arthroscopy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Acute ankle fracture is one of the commonest fractures of the lower limb. Anatomical reduction and stable fixation remain the main surgical treatment for unstable ankle fractures . However, its final outcomes are not as good as expected . Fracture malunion, failure to address the disrupted syndesmosis and associated ligamentous or chondral lesions can be reasons for poor surgical outcome.

1-mm of lateral talar shift lead to a 42% increase in contact stress, so the anatomic reduction is critical to the long-term integrity of the joint . It is difficult to assess 1 to 2 mm of mal-reduction with C-arm fluoroscopy. The best assessment of the syndesmotic reduction is performed with axial CT imaging of the ankle.

Ankle arthroscopy is expected to be a more sensitive tool for syndesmotic disruption diagnosis and other intra-articular pathologies and as a guide for anatomical reduction of the syndesmosis . Several studies have reported the incidence of chondral lesions seen during ankle arthroscopy at the time of ankle fracture ORIF, but those studies report the role of arthroscopy as a diagnostic or predictive tool for patient outcome. Very few studies have discussed the rates of arthroscopic intervention, the procedures performed, and the association of these procedures with patient final functional outcomes .

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

176

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: El-Taher Alaa Eldin Ahmed Eid, assisstant lecturer
  • Phone Number: 01004859149
  • Email: taheralaa92@gmail.com

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients ≥16 years of age who will be managed operatively for:

    • rotational ankle fracture Danis-Weber classification B or C fibula fracture
    • fracture dislocation ankle
    • Fractures extending into the tibial plafond,
    • Talus fractures (body or neck) in our institution

Exclusion Criteria:

Pediatric fractures, Polytrauma patients, Fractures managed with closed-contact casting and, patients with lost follow up during this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: those patients who will go for ORIF plus arthroscopy

we will start with a standard ankle arthroscopy. A leg holder and ankle joint distractor will be used. We will start with the anteromedial portal and introduce the 4-mm scope into the ankle joint. Next, under direct visualization, and taking care to preserve any branches of the superficial peroneal nerve, we will perform the anterolateral portal.

We will carry out a standard diagnostic ankle arthroscopy to evaluate the ankle cartilage, wash intra-articular haematoma, identify, and remove any intra-articular fracture fragments and loose bodies, perform dynamic ligamentous stress examinations while directly visualizing the syndesmosis, the deltoid ligament, and the lateral collateral ligament.

Following fracture fixation, arthroscopy will be also used as a second look to evaluate the quality of both articular and syndesmotic reduction, perform any needed arthroscopic intervention for deltoid ligament injury or management of chondral lesions (OCLs)

we will go for fixation of the fracture with association of scope intervention pre and post fixation
Other Names:
  • ankle fracture fixation with arthroscopy
Experimental: patients who will go for ORIF without arthroscopy
  • Posterior malleolus fractures will be addressed when it is present whatever its size.
  • The fibula fractures will be fixated using either a posterolateral or direct lateral incision. Lag screws will be used when the fracture pattern allows, and all fractures will be also treated with a neutralization or antiglide plate depending on the pattern and approach.
  • If a medial malleolus fracture is present, this will be addressed through a direct medial incision. These fractures will be either fixed with cannulated screws or tension band cerclage wiring or a plate and screw construct depending on the fracture pattern.
  • Once all bony injuries will be stabilized, a Cotton test will be performed under live fluoroscopy to determine syndesmosis stability. If positive, the syndesmosis will be stabilized using fully threaded screws.
we will go for fixation of the fracture alone with no scope intervention
Other Names:
  • ankle fracture fixation without arthroscopy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society(AOFAS) hindfoot score
Time Frame: 6 months and one year follow up
AOFAS hindfoot score difference between the 2 groups at 6 months and one year postoperatively from 0 to 100 where higher value indicates better functional outcomes
6 months and one year follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

November 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 7, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ankle Injuries

Clinical Trials on ankle arthroscopy with ORIF

3
Subscribe