Dose Reducing Door-to-balloon Time in ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction Cause Less Cost?

March 5, 2012 updated by: Chieh-Min Fan, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital

Better Quality With Less Cost? A Single Hospital Experience on Reducing Door-to-balloon Time in ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction

The investigators tried to determined whether the less D2B time led to costs savings benefited insurance payer and better outcomes to patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The relationship between the quality of care and costs has been discussed widely. Higher costs of care did not bring better outcomes, vice versa. However, as the rising spending of health care, the health care providers, insurance payers, governments, and consumers begin to pursue the higher quality of cares with lowest costs. In surgical experiences, improving the process of care succeeded to improve the quality of care and reduce the costs.

In patients with acute ST-Segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), A Door-to-Balloon (D2B) time of less than 90 minutes has been established as the gold standard for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and was associated with lower in-hospital mortality.9 Only less literatures discussed the costs and the quality of care in acute STEMI, and whether improving processes of care associated with lower costs was still controversial. The Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration (PHQID) in United State improved the processes of care but had not a significant effect on cost. Another single hospital experience in Indiana, USA, showed that the reducing D2B time in STEMI decreased the insurance payments as well as the total hospital costs. However, this study design was before-and-after intervention analysis, did not actually measure the impact of D2B time. Besides, the payment system in this study was prospective payment, not fee-for-service payment in Taiwan.

In this study, we tried to determined whether the less D2B time led to costs savings benefited insurance payer and better outcomes to patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

215

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 220
        • Far Eastern Memorial Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient presented between Feb. 1, 2007 and Jul. 31, 2009 at Far Eastern Memory Hospital for acute STEMI and unwent primary PCI.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • self visit
  • acute STEMI by ECG definition

Exclusion Criteria:

  • non-diagnosis on first ECG
  • transferred
  • diagnostic angiogram only

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
acute STEMI, Primpary PCI

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chieh-Min Fan, MD, MSc, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 1997

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

March 6, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 6, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2012

Last Verified

March 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe