- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01548781
The Effect of Resistance to Participant-Supported Reaching on Workspace of the Hand in Severe Chronic Stroke
October 5, 2015 updated by: Michael Ellis, Northwestern University
Disturbances in movement coordination are the least well understood but often the most debilitating with respect to functional recovery following stroke.
These deficits in coordination are expressed in the form of abnormal muscle synergies and result in limited and stereotypic movement patterns that are functionally disabling.
The result of these constraints in muscle synergies is an abnormal coupling between shoulder abduction and elbow flexion (i.e. the flexion synergy), which significantly reduces the reaching function of an individual with stroke when they lift up the weight of the impaired arm against gravity.
The investigators previous neurotherapeutic research, supported by a NIDRR Field Initiated research grant, has shown that the abnormal synergy between shoulder abduction and elbow flexion can be significantly reduced thus increasing total reaching range of motion in individuals with severe stroke.
The previous work established progressive abduction loading as a key element to the rehabilitation of reaching.
Although individuals with severe stroke benefited from the investigators previous work, residual flexion synergy continued to hinder normal arm function in most participants with severe stroke.
This study will utilize the ACT3D robot, developed as part of the investigators previous NIDRR project, to incorporate resistance to reaching while accounting for the known benefits of progressive abduction loading.
The investigators propose to randomize forty participants with severe stroke into two closely related interventions.
The groups will both practice reaching under abduction loading, however, the experimental group will also move against resistance while reaching.
Rigorous and quantitative investigation of therapeutic elements such as resistance to reaching and progressive abduction loading is only possible with a device such as the ACT3D.
the investigators will be able to standardize the delivery of each intervention using kinematic and kinetic parameters, which will allow for a clear identification of the therapeutic effect of resistance to reaching.
the investigators hypothesize that resistance to reaching in combination with progressive abduction loading will further increase dynamic multi-joint strength, increase total reaching range of motion, and increase arm function thus enhancing actual amount of use of the arm, participation in life roles, and quality of life in individuals with severe stroke.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
38
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
- Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
21 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Paresis confined to one side, with substantial motor impairment of the upper limb
- Absence of motor impairment in the unimpaired limb
- Absence of severe concurrent medical problems (e.g. cardiorespiratory impairment, changes in management of hypertension)
- Absence of any acute or chronic painful condition in the upper extremities or spine
- Absence of hemineglect
- Capacity to provide informed consent.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Viscous Resistance & Abduction Loading
The intervention for the experimental group entails practicing reaching utilizing the robotic device, ACT3D, with the experimental element of horizontal viscosity in combination with abduction loading.
|
All participants will undergo 8 weeks of reaching practice in the ACT3D.
Frequency and duration will be matched at three 1.5-hour sessions per week.
All reaching practice will include abduction (gravity) loading standardized to the participant's motor abilities.
The experimental group intervention will also include a horizontal viscous resistant element similar to pushing the arm through molasses.
|
Active Comparator: Abduction Loading
The intervention for the active comparison group entails practicing reaching utilizing the robotic device, ACT3D, with only abduction loading.
|
All participants will undergo 8 weeks of reaching practice in the ACT3D.
Frequency and duration will be matched at three 1.5-hour sessions per week.
All reaching practice will include abduction (gravity) loading standardized to the participant's motor abilities.
The experimental group intervention will also include a horizontal viscous resistant element similar to pushing the arm through molasses.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Peak Endpoint Reaching Velocity
Time Frame: Pre-test (Within one week prior to the onset of the intervention) to post-test (Within one week of the final intervention session) & post-test to 3-month follow-up (In the twelfth or thirteenth week following the last intervention session)
|
We will quantify peak endpoint reaching velocity with a robotic device, ACT3D, when a participant with stroke reaches as fast as they can toward an outward target under various abduction (gravity) loading conditions.
This measure will serve as the primary measure for changes in dynamic multi-joint strength.
|
Pre-test (Within one week prior to the onset of the intervention) to post-test (Within one week of the final intervention session) & post-test to 3-month follow-up (In the twelfth or thirteenth week following the last intervention session)
|
Change in Reaching Work Area
Time Frame: Pre-test (Within one week prior to the onset of the intervention) to post-test (Within one week of the final intervention session) & post-test to 3-month follow-up (In the twelfth or thirteenth week following the last intervention session)
|
We will quantify total reaching work area (combined shoulder and elbow range of motion) with a robotic device, ACT3D, under various abduction (gravity) loading conditions.
This measure will serve as the primary measure changes in dynamic multi-joint range of motion.
|
Pre-test (Within one week prior to the onset of the intervention) to post-test (Within one week of the final intervention session) & post-test to 3-month follow-up (In the twelfth or thirteenth week following the last intervention session)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment
Time Frame: Pre-(Within one week prior to the onset of the intervention), post-(Within one week of the final intervention session), and 3-month follow up (In the twelfth or thirteenth week following the last intervention session)
|
Qualitative and clinical assessment of general motor impairment of arm following stroke.
|
Pre-(Within one week prior to the onset of the intervention), post-(Within one week of the final intervention session), and 3-month follow up (In the twelfth or thirteenth week following the last intervention session)
|
Rancho Los Amigos Functional Test for the Hemiparetic Upper Extremity
Time Frame: Pre-(Within one week prior to the onset of the intervention), post-(Within one week of the final intervention session), and 3-month follow up (In the twelfth or thirteenth week following the last intervention session)
|
Qualitative and clinical assessment of activity limitation (function) of the arm following stroke.
|
Pre-(Within one week prior to the onset of the intervention), post-(Within one week of the final intervention session), and 3-month follow up (In the twelfth or thirteenth week following the last intervention session)
|
Stroke Impact Scale
Time Frame: Pre-(Within one week prior to the onset of the intervention), post-(Within one week of the final intervention session), and 3-month follow up (In the twelfth or thirteenth week following the last intervention session)
|
Structured interview to assess all domains of the ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health) in individuals following stroke.
|
Pre-(Within one week prior to the onset of the intervention), post-(Within one week of the final intervention session), and 3-month follow up (In the twelfth or thirteenth week following the last intervention session)
|
Motor Activity Log
Time Frame: Pre-(Within one week prior to the onset of the intervention), post-(Within one week of the final intervention session), and 3-month follow up (In the twelfth or thirteenth week following the last intervention session)
|
Structured interview assessing the individual with stroke's perception of difficulty in the context of arm function during a variety of activities of daily living.
|
Pre-(Within one week prior to the onset of the intervention), post-(Within one week of the final intervention session), and 3-month follow up (In the twelfth or thirteenth week following the last intervention session)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Sukal TM, Ellis MD, Dewald JP. Shoulder abduction-induced reductions in reaching work area following hemiparetic stroke: neuroscientific implications. Exp Brain Res. 2007 Nov;183(2):215-23. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1029-6. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
- Ellis MD, Sukal-Moulton T, Dewald JP. Progressive shoulder abduction loading is a crucial element of arm rehabilitation in chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Oct;23(8):862-9. doi: 10.1177/1545968309332927. Epub 2009 May 19.
- Ellis MD, Sukal T, DeMott T, Dewald JP. Augmenting clinical evaluation of hemiparetic arm movement with a laboratory-based quantitative measurement of kinematics as a function of limb loading. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Jul-Aug;22(4):321-9. doi: 10.1177/1545968307313509. Epub 2008 Mar 8.
- Ellis MD, Acosta AM, Yao J, Dewald JP. Position-dependent torque coupling and associated muscle activation in the hemiparetic upper extremity. Exp Brain Res. 2007 Feb;176(4):594-602. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0637-x. Epub 2006 Aug 22.
- Ellis MD, Holubar BG, Acosta AM, Beer RF, Dewald JP. Modifiability of abnormal isometric elbow and shoulder joint torque coupling after stroke. Muscle Nerve. 2005 Aug;32(2):170-8. doi: 10.1002/mus.20343.
- Ellis MD, Carmona C, Drogos J, Dewald JPA. Progressive Abduction Loading Therapy with Horizontal-Plane Viscous Resistance Targeting Weakness and Flexion Synergy to Treat Upper Limb Function in Chronic Hemiparetic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Front Neurol. 2018 Feb 19;9:71. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00071. eCollection 2018.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 1, 2015
Study Completion (Actual)
July 1, 2015
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 29, 2012
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 5, 2012
First Posted (Estimate)
March 8, 2012
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
October 6, 2015
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 5, 2015
Last Verified
October 1, 2015
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- H133G110245
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicBelgium
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, CryptogenicSingapore, Philippines
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, Cryptogenic
-
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicItaly
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; University of Alabama at BirminghamEnrolling by invitationStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Engagement, Patient | Stroke HemorrhagicUnited States
-
University of MinnesotaAmerican Occupational Therapy FoundationRecruitingStroke | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke IschemicUnited States
-
University of British ColumbiaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Michael Smith Foundation for...RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Chronic StrokeCanada
-
University of CincinnatiMedical University of South Carolina; University of California, Los Angeles; University...RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke HemorrhagicUnited States
-
Turkish Stroke Research and Clinical Trials NetworkElectroCore INC; Turkish Neurological SocietyCompletedStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke, HemorrhagicTurkey
-
University of LiegeCompletedStroke, Acute | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, ComplicationBelgium
Clinical Trials on Impairment-based robotic intervention for reaching function
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingHearing Impaired ChildrenPakistan
-
Posit Science CorporationUniversity of California, Davis; University of California, San Francisco; Stanford...Completed
-
Emory UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Completed
-
Manchester Metropolitan UniversityCompleted
-
Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and ScienceNot yet recruiting
-
Temple UniversityNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)Active, not recruiting
-
Mayo ClinicRecruitingMalignant Solid Neoplasm | Hematopoietic and Lymphoid System Neoplasm | Obesity-Related Malignant NeoplasmUnited States
-
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas CityCompletedPhysical Activity | Patient EngagementUnited States
-
The University of Hong KongNot yet recruiting
-
Anglia Ruskin UniversityLinkoeping UniversityCompletedTinnitusUnited Kingdom