Different Retraining Methods vs Usual Care on the Prevention of Peritonitis in Peritoneal Dialysis

August 26, 2020 updated by: Dong Jie, Peking University First Hospital

Retraining Via Operation Inspection or Verbal Education vs Usual Care on the Prevention of Peritonitis in Peritoneal Dialysis

To examine whether retraining via operation inspection or verbal education can reduce the risk for peritonitis in PD patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The design is prospective, randomized, controlled study. At baseline (during the first month), they will receive a standard training program on performing bag exchange and education on the prevention of peritonitis.

Then the participants will be randomized into three groups: retraining via operation inspection (G1), retraining via verbal education (G2) and usual care (G3). Retraining will be performed every 2 months in G1 and G2 group.

During the following 2 years or a longer period, all the participants will be followed up frequently with outcome events recorded.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100034
        • Jie Dong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • CAPD patients.
  • Medically stable and receiving PD for<1 week
  • age between 18 and 80 years
  • self-care or doing bag exchange by a fixed assistant Exclusion Criteria
  • followed up at least every 2 months
  • dialyzed with glucose lactate-buffered PD solutions produced by Baxter Corp, China

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy;
  • undergoing APD therapy
  • Intolerance to the study protocols;
  • Severe and unstable condition, acute or chronic inflammation disease;
  • a high probability (assessed by the recruiting physician) of receiving a kidney transplant or transferring to HD or drop-out due to socioeconomic causes within 6 months;
  • suffering peritonitis before receiving the interventions
  • cognitive or psychological dysfunction;
  • communication barrier

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: operation inspection
During retraining the patients performed bag exchange under the supervision of a nurse. The nurse ensured that each error listed in the NAC form should be avoided, thus immediately corrected any wrong steps if only.

Retraining via operation inspection means that nurses check if patients can follow the taught skill during the procedure of bag exchange and correct wrong steps in one-to-one way every 2 months.

Retraining via verbal education means that nurses remind patients of key points of bag exchange through interactive quiz derived from above checklist every 2 months till 24 months

Experimental: verbal education
Patients in the oral education group also underwent retraining every 2 months. A nurse would address all items in the NAC form one by one, to remind the patient of the key points of bag exchange. Scores calculated by the sum of error items during the bag exchange for patients in technique inspection group, or by the sum of "yes" in the interactive quiz for patients in verbal education group.

Retraining via operation inspection means that nurses check if patients can follow the taught skill during the procedure of bag exchange and correct wrong steps in one-to-one way every 2 months.

Retraining via verbal education means that nurses remind patients of key points of bag exchange through interactive quiz derived from above checklist every 2 months till 24 months

Experimental: usual care
Patients in the usual care group did not receive any retraining

Retraining via operation inspection means that nurses check if patients can follow the taught skill during the procedure of bag exchange and correct wrong steps in one-to-one way every 2 months.

Retraining via verbal education means that nurses remind patients of key points of bag exchange through interactive quiz derived from above checklist every 2 months till 24 months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
first-episode peritonitis
Time Frame: 48 months
Infection rates were calculated as the number of infections divided by the total time at risk, and expressed as episodes per 100 patient-years at risk.
48 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
first-episode enteric peritonitis,first-episode non-enteric peritonitis
Time Frame: 48 moths
Enteric organisms included enterococcus and enterobacter.
48 moths
transition transition to haemodialysis, and all-cause death.
Time Frame: 48 moths
transition to haemodialysis, and all-cause death.
48 moths

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jie Dong, MD,PhD,, Peking University First Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 14, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

June 18, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peritonitis

Clinical Trials on operation inspection

Subscribe