Preoperative Counseling in Cholecystectomy

June 27, 2012 updated by: Jose Eduardo de Aguilar-Nascimento, Federal University of Mato Grosso

Preoperative Counseling in Cholecystectomy. A Randomized Trial

The investigators examined whether a written plus verbal preoperative counseling for patients undergoing open cholecystectomy would improve perioperative symptoms such as nausea, vomiting and pain.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This was a randomized, single-blinded, clinical study carried out at the Julio Muller University Hospital (Mato Grosso State, Brazil). This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures involving human subjects/patients were approved by the hospital Research Ethics Committee registered under number 697/CEP-HUJM/09. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Except for the preoperative counseling which was received only by the intervention group, all patients received the same protocol of perioperative care.

The main endpoint of the study was the presence and the intensity of postoperative symptoms such as nausea, vomiting and pain. A questionnaire containing a visual analogue scale (VAS) was applied 24h after the operation to measure the intensity of postoperative pain, nausea and the well-being. The VAS consisted of a horizontal line, 100 mm in length, anchored by word descriptors at each end to represent the lowest and the highest intensity of all the symptoms analyzed. The patient was asked to mark in the straight line the point that most likely represents the symptom at the moment. The VAS score of each individual was determined by measuring in millimeters from the left end of the line to the point marked. The questions were: "how severe was your pain during this period of 24h after the operation?", "how severe was the intensity of your nausea during this period of 24h after the operation? ", and "how great is your well-being at the present moment". For the first two questions the words at each end of the line were "no pain" and "severe pain", and "no nausea" and "severe nausea". For the well-being question the words were "no well-being" and "greatest well-being". The Vomiting was also recorded as a categorical variable (yes or no). The length of stay and postoperative complications were also collected.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

119

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Mato Grosso
      • Cuiaba, Mato Grosso, Brazil, 78000-000
        • Hospital Universitario Julio Mullar

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult age (18-65 years-old),
  • both sexes and
  • candidates for an elective open cholecystectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • having diabetes mellitus,
  • chronic kidney failure,
  • chronic liver disease,
  • serum bilirubin > 2 mg/dL,
  • body mass index (BMI) > 35 kg/m2,
  • American Anesthesiologists Association (ASA) score > 3,
  • gastro-esophageal reflux,
  • gastroparesis or intestinal obstruction.

Patients with any non-compliance with the study protocol, who had the choledochus opened or associated operations, who experienced severe intraoperative complications (any type of shock, cardiac arrest or coagulations problems) or experienced prolonged (> 4 h) operative time were also excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Preoperative counseling
The intervention group received preoperative counseling by both orally and written. A written leaflet containing information was provided to each patient of this group.
The intervention group received preoperative counseling by both orally and written. A written leaflet containing information was provided to each patient of this group.
Other Names:
  • Preoperative information
No Intervention: Control
The control group received no preoperative counseling either oral or written.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue scale
Time Frame: 24h after operation
A questionnaire containing a visual analogue scale (VAS) was applied 24h after the operation to measure the intensity of postoperative pain, nausea and the well-being. The VAS consisted of a horizontal line, 100 mm in length, anchored by word descriptors at each end to represent the lowest and the highest intensity of all the symptoms analyzed. The patient was asked to mark in the straight line the point that most likely represents the symptom at the moment. The VAS score of each individual was determined by measuring in millimeters from the left end of the line to the point marked.
24h after operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Episodes of vomiting
Time Frame: During the first 24h after surgery
Number of episodes of vomiting occurring until 24h after the operation
During the first 24h after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jose Aguilar-Nascimento, MD, PhD, Federal University of Mato Grosso

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

June 28, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 28, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2012

Last Verified

June 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • preopcounseling
  • 697/CEP-HUJM/09 (Other Identifier: HUJM Research Ethics Committee)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nausea

Clinical Trials on Preoperative counseling

Subscribe