Patient Preparedness for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery (PREOP)

Patient Preparedness for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Preoperative Counseling

Patient preparedness has been associated with increased patient satisfaction, decreased postoperative pain and decreased postoperative narcotic use; however, little is known regarding the optimal way to prepare patients prior to pelvic reconstructive surgery. The primary aim of this study is to determine if a preoperative counseling in person visit has similar rates of patient preparedness as a preoperative counseling phone call for women undergoing same-day pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Secondary aims evaluate patient satisfaction, postoperative pain scores and postoperative narcotic usage. Women who plan to undergo pelvic organ prolapse surgery will be randomized to a preoperative in person counseling visit or a preoperative counseling phone call. Participants will complete questionnaires to assess their preparedness, satisfaction and postoperative pain. The goal of this study is to gather information that will allow clinicians to improve patient surgical preparedness and satisfaction.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Pelvic Organ Prolapse; Patient Preparedness
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Preoperative counseling office visit; Other: Preoperative counseling phone call

Detailed Description

This will be a randomized controlled trial to assess patient preparedness following a preoperative counseling in person visit when compared to a preoperative counseling phone call.

Recruitment & Enrollment: Participants will be recruited and enrolled from the urogynecology office during their surgical planning visit. The study will be introduced at this visit and participants will have the opportunity to bring the consent home to review and consider their participation prior to signing.

Randomization: Participants will be block randomized in a 1:1 ratio in block size of 2. Randomization will be done by REDCap. The participant will not be blinded given the nature of the intervention. Additionally, the attending surgeon, fellow and office staff (advanced practice providers, research staff, medical assistants) will be aware of the randomization group as they will be participating in the preoperative intervention or perioperative clinical care.

Intervention: Both the preoperative counseling visit and preoperative phone call will contain the same components of discussion and counseling which include surgical details, risks and benefits, preoperative and postoperative instructions and expectations. The visit will take place in the urogynecology office and the visits and phone calls will be done by either a fellow or advanced practice provider, all of whom have extensive experience with the standardized preoperative visit.

Follow up: A postoperative phone call will be completed either POD#1 or POD#2 to remind the participant to complete their daily pain diary. Each participant will follow up for their standard postoperative visit approximately 4-6 weeks postoperative. All patients routinely receive a call on POD#1 from our nurses to assess how they are doing postoperatively. This phone call will continue unchanged for all participants.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 120
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Pennsylvania
    • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
      • Magee-Womens' Hospital of UPMC

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 21 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Women planning to undergo same-day surgery to correct pelvic organ prolapse by the University of Pittsburgh Division of Urogynecology. Women remain eligible if they are admitted for observation following their surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Non-English speaking patients
• A preoperative exam requirement that would necessitate an in person office visit (i.e. need for pessary removal, self-catheterization teaching)
• Plan for concomitant surgical management with gynecology oncology or colorectal surgery
• Residence in a nursing home

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Preoperative counseling office visit; Participants will present for an in-person preoperative counseling office visit (preoperative counseling session). This will occur within a few weeks of surgery. Preoperative counseling topics are standardized and will be identical with each arm.	Other: Preoperative counseling office visit; All patients undergo a preoperative counseling session prior to surgery. Participants in this arm will have an in person preoperative counseling office visit.; Other Names: Office
Active Comparator: Preoperative counseling phone call; Participants will receive a preoperative counseling phone call (preoperative counseling session). This will occur within a few weeks of surgery. Preoperative counseling topics are standardized and will be identical with each arm.	Other: Preoperative counseling phone call; All patients undergo a preoperative counseling session prior to surgery. Participants in this arm will have a preoperative counseling phone call.; Other Names: Call

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Patient preparedness	The percent of patients reporting preparedness on Preoperative Preparedness Questionnaire. Participants who answer "strongly agree" or "agree" to the statement "Overall, I felt prepared for my surgery" will be considered prepared. This instrument is a 9-item questionnaire and scored on a 5-point Likert scale with answers ranging from "5=strongly disagree" to "1=strongly agree" with "3=neutral." Therefore, scores of "1=strongly agree" or "2=agree" will be considered a positive answer for preparedness. It was adopted from a study by Kenton et al in 2007.	At postoperative visit (about 4-6 weeks after surgery)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Patient satisfaction: Decision Scale-Pelvic Floor Disorders questionnaire	The percent of patients reporting satisfaction on the Satisfaction with Decision Scale-Pelvic Floor Disorders questionnaire. This is a validated, 5-item questionnaire with answers on a 5-point likert scale with "1=strongly agree," "3=neutral" and "5=strongly disagree." Answers of "1=strongly agree" or "2=agree" to the statement "I am satisfied with my decision" will be considered satisfied.	At postoperative visit (about 4-6 weeks after surgery)
Postoperative pain scores	Postoperative pain scores on postoperative days #1-7 on a scale of 0-10. Participants will complete a daily pain diary which will assess their pain score with 0=no pain and 10=worst pain imaginable.	Postoperative days #1-7
Postoperative narcotic use	Postoperative narcotics used which will be assessed by the daily pain diary (question: "How many narcotic pills did you use today?" with the answer being the number of pills used that day).	Postoperative days #1-7

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of Pittsburgh
• Collaborators: University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Jessica Sassani, University of Pittsburgh

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Holmes-Rovner M, Kroll J, Schmitt N, Rovner DR, Breer ML, Rothert ML, Padonu G, Talarczyk G. Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: the satisfaction with decision scale. Med Decis Making. 1996 Jan-Mar;16(1):58-64. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9601600114.
• Sung VW, Kauffman N, Raker CA, Myers DL, Clark MA. Validation of decision-making outcomes for female pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;198(5):575.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.12.035. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
• Kenton K, Pham T, Mueller E, Brubaker L. Patient preparedness: an important predictor of surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;197(6):654.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.059.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): April 2, 2019
• Primary Completion (Actual): May 1, 2020
• Study Completion (Actual): May 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: February 7, 2019
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 8, 2019
• First Posted (Actual): February 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): June 4, 2020
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 2, 2020
• Last Verified: June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Randomized controlled trial; Pelvic organ prolapse; Patient preparedness
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pathological Conditions, Anatomical; Prolapse; Pelvic Organ Prolapse
• Other Study ID Numbers: STUDY19010073

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO
• IPD Plan Description: There is no plan to make IPD available to other researchers

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No