The Impact of a Redesigned Handout for Robotic Sacrocolpopexy on Patient Preoperative Preparedness and Satisfaction

April 10, 2025 updated by: Christine Herforth, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Randomized Controlled Study on Patient Preoperative Preparedness and Satisfaction Using a Redesigned Handout for Robotic Sacrocolpopexy

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a new preoperative handout for patients undergoing robotic sacrocolpopexy will improve patient sense of preparedness and satisfaction in comparison to the previously used handout. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the new preoperative handout for patients undergoing robotic sacrocolpopexy improve patient preparedness and satisfaction?
  • Will the new preoperative handout for patients undergoing robotic sacrocolpopexy impact postoperative queries in the form of phone calls and messages to the clinic?

Participants will:

  • Receive routine counseling regarding robotic sacrocolpopexy from their surgeon
  • Be randomized to the new or old preoperative handout
  • Undergo robotic sacrocolpopexy
  • Complete a questionnaire at their 4 week postoperative follow up visit regarding their sense of preparedness for surgery and overall satisfaction

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
        • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • women who were to undergo robotic sacrocolpopexy with or without supracervical hysterectomy, rectopexy, salpingectomy, urinary incontinence procedures, or other minor procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients unable to provide informed consent, those undergoing other concomitant major abdominal surgeries, patients less than 18 years old, pregnant patients, non-English speaking patients, and patients planning postoperative follow up at an outside facility.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Old preoperative handout
Standard or old preoperative handout for robotic sacrocolpopexy was based off of the handout for robotic sacrocolpopexy from the American Urogynecologic Society
The old or standard preoperative handout for robotic sacrocolpopexy
Experimental: New preoperative handout
A new preoperative handout for robotic sacrocolpopexy was designed by changing the old preoperative handout such that it was written at a lower grade reading level and provided more perioperative details
A new preoperative handout for robotic sacrocolpopexy was designed at a lower reading level and providing more perioperative details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient preparedness
Time Frame: Assessed at the postoperative visit 4 to 6 weeks after srugery
Patients sense of preparedness for robotic sacrocolpopexy was measured with a series of 5 point Likert style questions (ranging strongly disagree to strongly agree). Specifically, patients were asked how satisfied the were with 1) information provided by their surgeon, 2) time spent with the patient preparing them for surgery, 3) overall sense of sense of preparedness.
Assessed at the postoperative visit 4 to 6 weeks after srugery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 week postoperatively
patient satisfaction for their overall experience undergoing robotic was assessed using a 5 point patient score. Scores ranged from extremely dissatisfied to extremely satisfied
4 week postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STU-2022-0305

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Clinical Trials on old preoperative handout

Subscribe