- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01633333
Water Exchange Versus Carbon Dioxide for Colonoscopy
February 11, 2014 updated by: Sorlandet Hospital HF
Water Exchange Versus Carbon Dioxide Insufflation to Improve Colonoscopy Screening - a Randomized Controlled Trial
Colonoscopy is commonly used in screening for colorectal cancer.
A refined technique of colonoscopy involving the use of water as the sole modality to aid colonoscope insertion, water exchange, has been described in recent research papers to decrease patient discomfort and pain, and to reduce the need for sedation during colonoscopy when compared with standard air insufflation.
Carbon dioxide insufflation has been described to decrease patient discomfort after colonoscopy.
No randomized trial has so far compared the use of water exchange to carbon dioxide insufflation.
Our hypothesis is that water exchange inflicts less discomfort to patients undergoing colonoscopy than carbon dioxide insufflation.
Patients undergoing screening colonoscopy in two centers in Norway, one center in Poland and one center in The Netherlands will be enrolled and randomized to examination of either of the two methods.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Single blinded randomized controlled trial.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
473
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
50 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients scheduled for screening or polyp surveillance colonoscopy
- Patients accepting sedation on demand
Exclusion Criteria:
- Demand for sedation/analgesia before the start of the procedure
- Previous partial or total colonic resection
- Pregnancy
- Unwilling/unable to provide informed consent
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Screening
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Water exchange
Colonoscopy with water exchange as the sole modality to reach the cecum.
Carbon dioxide can be used in case of intubation failure with the test method.
|
Water is infused and suctioned in a systematic fashion to obtain luminal view and for cleansing of the colon to facilitate colonoscope insertion.
The carbon dioxide pump is turned off, only to be turned on during withdrawal from the cecum.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Carbon dioxide insufflation
Carbon dioxide insufflation will be used in standard fashion to reach the cecum.
|
Carbon dioxide insufflation to obtain luminal view to facilitate colonoscope insertion, considered to be standard procedure.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain during colonoscopy
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Patients will be asked by a blinded assistant immediately after colonoscopy to score pain during the procedure.
|
1 hour
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain during colonoscopy
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
Patients will be asked to report pain during colonoscopy to an unblinded study assistant.
|
30 minutes
|
|
Cecal intubation rate
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Cecal intubation rate is defined as successful completion of colonoscopy insertion.
This will be analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis according to group allocation.
|
1 hour
|
|
Cecal intubation time
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
The time taken to complete insertion of the colonoscope.
|
1 hour
|
|
Adenoma detection rate
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Detection of adenomas during each colonoscopy procedure
|
1 hour
|
|
Polyp detection rate
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Detection of any colonic polyp, irrespective of histologic type, during each procedure.
|
1 hour
|
|
Dose of medication
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Dose of sedative and analgesic medication needed to complete the colonoscopy.
|
1 hour
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kjetil K Garborg, MD, Sorlandet Hospital HF Kristiansand, Norway
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Leung F, Harker J, Leung J, Siao-Salera R, Mann S, Ramirez F, Friedland S, Amato A, Radaelli F, Paggi S, Terruzzi V, Hsieh Y. Removal of infused water predominantly during insertion (water exchange) is consistently associated with a greater reduction of pain score - review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of water method colonoscopy. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;1(3):114-120. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.3.18510. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
- Riss S, Akan B, Mikola B, Rieder E, Karner-Hanusch J, Dirlea D, Mittlbock M, Weiser FA. CO2 insufflation during colonoscopy decreases post-interventional pain in deeply sedated patients: a randomized controlled trial. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2009;121(13-14):464-8. doi: 10.1007/s00508-009-1202-y.
- Ramirez FC, Leung FW. A head-to-head comparison of the water vs. air method in patients undergoing screening colonoscopy. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;1(3):130-135. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.3.18512. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
- Leung FW, Leung JW, Siao-Salera RM, Mann SK, Jackson G. The water method significantly enhances detection of diminutive lesions (adenoma and hyperplastic polyp combined) in the proximal colon in screening colonoscopy - data derived from two RCT in US veterans. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr;1(2):48-52. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.2.16826.
- Denberg TD, Melhado TV, Coombes JM, Beaty BL, Berman K, Byers TE, Marcus AC, Steiner JF, Ahnen DJ. Predictors of nonadherence to screening colonoscopy. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Nov;20(11):989-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00164.x.
- Khalid-de Bakker CA, Jonkers DM, Hameeteman W, de Ridder RJ, Masclee AA, Stockbrugger RW. Cardiopulmonary events during primary colonoscopy screening in an average risk population. Neth J Med. 2011 Apr;69(4):186-91.
- Jonas DE, Russell LB, Sandler RS, Chou J, Pignone M. Patient time requirements for screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Nov;102(11):2401-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01387.x. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
- Leung FW, Leung JW, Mann SK, Friedland S, Ramirez FC. The water method significantly enhances patient-centered outcomes in sedated and unsedated colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2011 Sep;43(9):816-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256407. Epub 2011 May 24.
- Leung F, Harker J, Leung J, Siao-Salera R, Mann S, Ramirez F, Friedland S, Amato A, Radaelli F, Paggi S, Terruzzi V, Hsieh Y. Removal of infused water predominantly during insertion (water exchange) is consistently associated with an increase in adenoma detection rate - review of data in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of water-related methods. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;1(3):121-126. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.3.18517. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
- Stevenson GW, Wilson JA, Wilkinson J, Norman G, Goodacre RL. Pain following colonoscopy: elimination with carbon dioxide. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992 Sep-Oct;38(5):564-7. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(92)70517-3.
- Bretthauer M, Thiis-Evensen E, Huppertz-Hauss G, Gisselsson L, Grotmol T, Skovlund E, Hoff G. NORCCAP (Norwegian colorectal cancer prevention): a randomised trial to assess the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide versus air insufflation in colonoscopy. Gut. 2002 May;50(5):604-7. doi: 10.1136/gut.50.5.604.
- Sumanac K, Zealley I, Fox BM, Rawlinson J, Salena B, Marshall JK, Stevenson GW, Hunt RH. Minimizing postcolonoscopy abdominal pain by using CO(2) insufflation: a prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled trial evaluating a new commercially available CO(2) delivery system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Aug;56(2):190-4. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(02)70176-4.
- Church J, Delaney C. Randomized, controlled trial of carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 Mar;46(3):322-6. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6549-6.
- Wong JC, Yau KK, Cheung HY, Wong DC, Chung CC, Li MK. Towards painless colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial on carbon dioxide-insufflating colonoscopy. ANZ J Surg. 2008 Oct;78(10):871-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04683.x.
- Uraoka T, Kato J, Kuriyama M, Hori K, Ishikawa S, Harada K, Takemoto K, Hiraoka S, Fujita H, Horii J, Saito Y, Yamamoto K. CO(2) insufflation for potentially difficult colonoscopies: efficacy when used by less experienced colonoscopists. World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Nov 7;15(41):5186-92. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5186.
- Geyer M, Guller U, Beglinger C. Carbon dioxide insufflation in routine colonoscopy is safe and more comfortable: results of a randomized controlled double-blinded trial. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2011;2011:378906. doi: 10.1155/2011/378906. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
- Leung FW, Leung JW, Mann SK, Friedland S, Ramirez FC, Olafsson S. DDW 2011 cutting edge colonoscopy techniques - state of the art lecture master class - warm water infusion/CO(2) insufflation for colonoscopy. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr;1(2):78-82. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.2.16830. Erratum In: J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;1(3):141.
- Hoff G, Bretthauer M, Huppertz-Hauss G, Kittang E, Stallemo A, Hoie O, Dahler S, Nyhus S, Halvorsen FA, Pallenschat J, Vetvik K, Kristian Sandvei P, Friestad J, Pytte R, Coll P. The Norwegian Gastronet project: Continuous quality improvement of colonoscopy in 14 Norwegian centres. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006 Apr;41(4):481-7. doi: 10.1080/00365520500265208.
- Garborg K, Kaminski MF, Lindenburger W, Wiig H, Hasund A, Wronska E, Bie RB, Kleist B, Lovdal L, Holme O, Kalager M, Hoff G, Bretthauer M. Water exchange versus carbon dioxide insufflation in unsedated colonoscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2015 Mar;47(3):192-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390795. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
June 1, 2012
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2013
Study Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2013
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 29, 2012
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 3, 2012
First Posted (Estimate)
July 4, 2012
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
February 12, 2014
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 11, 2014
Last Verified
February 1, 2014
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Digestive System Diseases
- Neoplasms by Histologic Type
- Neoplasms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
- Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
- Digestive System Neoplasms
- Gastrointestinal Diseases
- Colonic Diseases
- Intestinal Diseases
- Intestinal Neoplasms
- Rectal Diseases
- Colorectal Neoplasms
- Adenoma
Other Study ID Numbers
- WMCO2_KG
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain
-
Boston Scientific CorporationRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Leg Pain | Intractable Pain | Chronic Leg PainUnited States
-
Qi's ClinicNot yet recruitingNon-Cancer Pain,Musculoskeletal Pain,Chronic Pain,Acute Pain
-
Flowonix MedicalApproved for marketingBack Pain | Leg Pain | Trunk Pain | Intractable Pain | Arm Pain
-
George Washington UniversityRecruitingCervical Fusion | Pain, Back | Pain, Neck | Myofacial PainUnited States
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | VATSTurkey
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompletedPain, Radiating | Pain, Burning | Pain, Crushing | Pain, Migratory | Pain, SplittingUnited States, France, Spain, Poland, Portugal
-
susanne beckerSNSFCompletedLow Back Pain | Pain, Acute | Pain, ChronicSwitzerland
-
Universitat Jaume ICompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | OncologySpain
-
University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinZealand University Hospital; European Regional Development Fund; Design School...CompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Pain Measurement | Pain, CancerGermany
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedCervical Pain | Lumbar Pain SyndromeEgypt
Clinical Trials on Water exchange colonoscopy
-
Air Force Military Medical University, ChinaCompleted
-
University of California, DavisCompletedColon Cancer | Hyperplastic Polyp | Tubular AdenomaUnited States
-
Evergreen General Hospital, TaiwanCompletedColonic Adenoma | Water Exchange ColonoscopyTaiwan
-
Dalin Tzu Chi General HospitalCompletedColonoscopy | Intubation Time | Cap-assisted ColonoscopyTaiwan
-
Dalin Tzu Chi General HospitalRecruitingColonoscopy | Colon AdenomaUnited States, Taiwan
-
East Bay Institute for Research and EducationCompleted
-
Presidio Ospedaliero Santa BarbaraCompletedAbdominal PainUnited States, Czech Republic, Italy
-
Vitkovice HospitalCompleted
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompletedColorectal NeoplasmsUnited States
-
Dalin Tzu Chi General HospitalSepulveda Ambulatory Care Center, VAGLAHSCompletedAdenomaUnited States, Taiwan