Warm Water Versus Room Temperature Water Immersion Colonoscopy

September 19, 2013 updated by: Premysl Falt MD, Vitkovice Hospital

Warm Water Versus Room Temperature Water Immersion Colonoscopy - a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Single-center Trial

Water immersion insertion has been documented to decrease procedure-related discomfort during colonoscopy. There was used warm water infusion for colonoscope insertion in most of the water immersion colonoscopy trials.

The investigators have been using room temperature water (20-24°C) for water immersion and the investigators did not notice any drawback of it. In our opinion, it is simpler and cheaper option for water immersion colonoscopy and proof of its efficacy and safety could support the use of water immersion technique in routine practice.

The primary endpoint is cecal intubation time and the investigators suppose that the use of warm water infusion does not shorten it significantly. Patient comfort during colonoscope insertion, water consumption, length of the scope while reaching the cecum, need for external compression, need for positioning of the patient and endoscopist´s difficulty with colonoscopy will be also assessed.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

212

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ostrava, Czech Republic, 703 84
        • Digestive Diseases Center, Vìtkovice Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • outpatient diagnostic colonoscopy
  • bowel prep with macrogolum
  • initial 2 mg of midazolam i.v.
  • signed informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • planned therapeutic intervention
  • colorectal surgery in history
  • known inflammatory bowel disease or colorectal cancer
  • refusal of sedation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Warm Water Immersion Colonoscopy
Colonoscopy using purely warm water (37°C) infusion during colonoscope insertion and room air insufflation during colonoscope withdrawal.
Colonoscopy using warm water (37°C) infusion for colonoscope insertion and room air insufflation during colonoscope withdrawal.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Cool Water Immersion Colonoscopy
Colonoscopy using purely room temperature water (20-24°C) infusion during colonoscope insertion and room air insufflation during colonoscope withdrawal.
Colonoscopy using room temperature water (20-24°C) infusion for colonoscope insertion and room air insufflation during colonoscope withdrawal.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cecal Intubation Time
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
Cecal Intubation Time
Time Frame: 1-30
= time between introduction of the colonoscope into the anus and reaching the cecum.
1-30

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Patient Comfort During Insertion Phase of the Colonoscopy
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 18, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 20, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 20, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2013

Last Verified

September 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe