- ICH GCP
- Register voor klinische proeven in de VS.
- Klinische proef NCT01633333
Water Exchange Versus Carbon Dioxide for Colonoscopy
11 februari 2014 bijgewerkt door: Sorlandet Hospital HF
Water Exchange Versus Carbon Dioxide Insufflation to Improve Colonoscopy Screening - a Randomized Controlled Trial
Colonoscopy is commonly used in screening for colorectal cancer.
A refined technique of colonoscopy involving the use of water as the sole modality to aid colonoscope insertion, water exchange, has been described in recent research papers to decrease patient discomfort and pain, and to reduce the need for sedation during colonoscopy when compared with standard air insufflation.
Carbon dioxide insufflation has been described to decrease patient discomfort after colonoscopy.
No randomized trial has so far compared the use of water exchange to carbon dioxide insufflation.
Our hypothesis is that water exchange inflicts less discomfort to patients undergoing colonoscopy than carbon dioxide insufflation.
Patients undergoing screening colonoscopy in two centers in Norway, one center in Poland and one center in The Netherlands will be enrolled and randomized to examination of either of the two methods.
Studie Overzicht
Toestand
Voltooid
Interventie / Behandeling
Gedetailleerde beschrijving
Single blinded randomized controlled trial.
Studietype
Ingrijpend
Inschrijving (Werkelijk)
473
Fase
- Niet toepasbaar
Contacten en locaties
In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.
Deelname Criteria
Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.
Geschiktheidscriteria
Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie
50 jaar tot 80 jaar (Volwassen, Oudere volwassene)
Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers
Ja
Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie
Allemaal
Beschrijving
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients scheduled for screening or polyp surveillance colonoscopy
- Patients accepting sedation on demand
Exclusion Criteria:
- Demand for sedation/analgesia before the start of the procedure
- Previous partial or total colonic resection
- Pregnancy
- Unwilling/unable to provide informed consent
Studie plan
Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.
Hoe is de studie opgezet?
Ontwerpdetails
- Primair doel: Screening
- Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
- Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
- Masker: Enkel
Wapens en interventies
Deelnemersgroep / Arm |
Interventie / Behandeling |
|---|---|
|
Experimenteel: Water exchange
Colonoscopy with water exchange as the sole modality to reach the cecum.
Carbon dioxide can be used in case of intubation failure with the test method.
|
Water is infused and suctioned in a systematic fashion to obtain luminal view and for cleansing of the colon to facilitate colonoscope insertion.
The carbon dioxide pump is turned off, only to be turned on during withdrawal from the cecum.
Andere namen:
|
|
Actieve vergelijker: Carbon dioxide insufflation
Carbon dioxide insufflation will be used in standard fashion to reach the cecum.
|
Carbon dioxide insufflation to obtain luminal view to facilitate colonoscope insertion, considered to be standard procedure.
Andere namen:
|
Wat meet het onderzoek?
Primaire uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Maatregel Beschrijving |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain during colonoscopy
Tijdsspanne: 1 hour
|
Patients will be asked by a blinded assistant immediately after colonoscopy to score pain during the procedure.
|
1 hour
|
Secundaire uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Maatregel Beschrijving |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain during colonoscopy
Tijdsspanne: 30 minutes
|
Patients will be asked to report pain during colonoscopy to an unblinded study assistant.
|
30 minutes
|
|
Cecal intubation rate
Tijdsspanne: 1 hour
|
Cecal intubation rate is defined as successful completion of colonoscopy insertion.
This will be analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis according to group allocation.
|
1 hour
|
|
Cecal intubation time
Tijdsspanne: 1 hour
|
The time taken to complete insertion of the colonoscope.
|
1 hour
|
|
Adenoma detection rate
Tijdsspanne: 1 hour
|
Detection of adenomas during each colonoscopy procedure
|
1 hour
|
|
Polyp detection rate
Tijdsspanne: 1 hour
|
Detection of any colonic polyp, irrespective of histologic type, during each procedure.
|
1 hour
|
|
Dose of medication
Tijdsspanne: 1 hour
|
Dose of sedative and analgesic medication needed to complete the colonoscopy.
|
1 hour
|
Medewerkers en onderzoekers
Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.
Sponsor
Medewerkers
Onderzoekers
- Hoofdonderzoeker: Kjetil K Garborg, MD, Sorlandet Hospital HF Kristiansand, Norway
Publicaties en nuttige links
De persoon die verantwoordelijk is voor het invoeren van informatie over het onderzoek stelt deze publicaties vrijwillig ter beschikking. Dit kan gaan over alles wat met het onderzoek te maken heeft.
Algemene publicaties
- Leung F, Harker J, Leung J, Siao-Salera R, Mann S, Ramirez F, Friedland S, Amato A, Radaelli F, Paggi S, Terruzzi V, Hsieh Y. Removal of infused water predominantly during insertion (water exchange) is consistently associated with a greater reduction of pain score - review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of water method colonoscopy. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;1(3):114-120. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.3.18510. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
- Riss S, Akan B, Mikola B, Rieder E, Karner-Hanusch J, Dirlea D, Mittlbock M, Weiser FA. CO2 insufflation during colonoscopy decreases post-interventional pain in deeply sedated patients: a randomized controlled trial. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2009;121(13-14):464-8. doi: 10.1007/s00508-009-1202-y.
- Ramirez FC, Leung FW. A head-to-head comparison of the water vs. air method in patients undergoing screening colonoscopy. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;1(3):130-135. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.3.18512. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
- Leung FW, Leung JW, Siao-Salera RM, Mann SK, Jackson G. The water method significantly enhances detection of diminutive lesions (adenoma and hyperplastic polyp combined) in the proximal colon in screening colonoscopy - data derived from two RCT in US veterans. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr;1(2):48-52. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.2.16826.
- Denberg TD, Melhado TV, Coombes JM, Beaty BL, Berman K, Byers TE, Marcus AC, Steiner JF, Ahnen DJ. Predictors of nonadherence to screening colonoscopy. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Nov;20(11):989-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00164.x.
- Khalid-de Bakker CA, Jonkers DM, Hameeteman W, de Ridder RJ, Masclee AA, Stockbrugger RW. Cardiopulmonary events during primary colonoscopy screening in an average risk population. Neth J Med. 2011 Apr;69(4):186-91.
- Jonas DE, Russell LB, Sandler RS, Chou J, Pignone M. Patient time requirements for screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Nov;102(11):2401-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01387.x. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
- Leung FW, Leung JW, Mann SK, Friedland S, Ramirez FC. The water method significantly enhances patient-centered outcomes in sedated and unsedated colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2011 Sep;43(9):816-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256407. Epub 2011 May 24.
- Leung F, Harker J, Leung J, Siao-Salera R, Mann S, Ramirez F, Friedland S, Amato A, Radaelli F, Paggi S, Terruzzi V, Hsieh Y. Removal of infused water predominantly during insertion (water exchange) is consistently associated with an increase in adenoma detection rate - review of data in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of water-related methods. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;1(3):121-126. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.3.18517. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
- Stevenson GW, Wilson JA, Wilkinson J, Norman G, Goodacre RL. Pain following colonoscopy: elimination with carbon dioxide. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992 Sep-Oct;38(5):564-7. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(92)70517-3.
- Bretthauer M, Thiis-Evensen E, Huppertz-Hauss G, Gisselsson L, Grotmol T, Skovlund E, Hoff G. NORCCAP (Norwegian colorectal cancer prevention): a randomised trial to assess the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide versus air insufflation in colonoscopy. Gut. 2002 May;50(5):604-7. doi: 10.1136/gut.50.5.604.
- Sumanac K, Zealley I, Fox BM, Rawlinson J, Salena B, Marshall JK, Stevenson GW, Hunt RH. Minimizing postcolonoscopy abdominal pain by using CO(2) insufflation: a prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled trial evaluating a new commercially available CO(2) delivery system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Aug;56(2):190-4. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(02)70176-4.
- Church J, Delaney C. Randomized, controlled trial of carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 Mar;46(3):322-6. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6549-6.
- Wong JC, Yau KK, Cheung HY, Wong DC, Chung CC, Li MK. Towards painless colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial on carbon dioxide-insufflating colonoscopy. ANZ J Surg. 2008 Oct;78(10):871-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04683.x.
- Uraoka T, Kato J, Kuriyama M, Hori K, Ishikawa S, Harada K, Takemoto K, Hiraoka S, Fujita H, Horii J, Saito Y, Yamamoto K. CO(2) insufflation for potentially difficult colonoscopies: efficacy when used by less experienced colonoscopists. World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Nov 7;15(41):5186-92. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5186.
- Geyer M, Guller U, Beglinger C. Carbon dioxide insufflation in routine colonoscopy is safe and more comfortable: results of a randomized controlled double-blinded trial. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2011;2011:378906. doi: 10.1155/2011/378906. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
- Leung FW, Leung JW, Mann SK, Friedland S, Ramirez FC, Olafsson S. DDW 2011 cutting edge colonoscopy techniques - state of the art lecture master class - warm water infusion/CO(2) insufflation for colonoscopy. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr;1(2):78-82. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.2.16830. Erratum In: J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;1(3):141.
- Hoff G, Bretthauer M, Huppertz-Hauss G, Kittang E, Stallemo A, Hoie O, Dahler S, Nyhus S, Halvorsen FA, Pallenschat J, Vetvik K, Kristian Sandvei P, Friestad J, Pytte R, Coll P. The Norwegian Gastronet project: Continuous quality improvement of colonoscopy in 14 Norwegian centres. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006 Apr;41(4):481-7. doi: 10.1080/00365520500265208.
- Garborg K, Kaminski MF, Lindenburger W, Wiig H, Hasund A, Wronska E, Bie RB, Kleist B, Lovdal L, Holme O, Kalager M, Hoff G, Bretthauer M. Water exchange versus carbon dioxide insufflation in unsedated colonoscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2015 Mar;47(3):192-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390795. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
Studie record data
Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.
Bestudeer belangrijke data
Studie start
1 juni 2012
Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)
1 december 2013
Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)
1 december 2013
Studieregistratiedata
Eerst ingediend
29 juni 2012
Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria
3 juli 2012
Eerst geplaatst (Schatting)
4 juli 2012
Updates van studierecords
Laatste update geplaatst (Schatting)
12 februari 2014
Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria
11 februari 2014
Laatst geverifieerd
1 februari 2014
Meer informatie
Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie
Trefwoorden
Aanvullende relevante MeSH-voorwaarden
- Ziekten van het spijsverteringsstelsel
- Neoplasmata per histologisch type
- Neoplasmata
- Neoplasmata per site
- Neoplasmata, glandulair en epitheel
- Gastro-intestinale neoplasmata
- Neoplasmata van het spijsverteringsstelsel
- Gastro-intestinale aandoeningen
- Colon Ziekten
- Darmziekten
- Intestinale neoplasmata
- Rectale ziekten
- Colorectale neoplasmata
- Adenoom
Andere studie-ID-nummers
- WMCO2_KG
Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .