The Use of a Computer Program to Help Primary Care Providers Treat Patients With Type 2 Diabetes (CADS)

November 24, 2015 updated by: Alicia L. Warnock, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

The Use of a Computer Assisted Diabetes Decision Support (CADS) System to Improve Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Who Are Treated by Primary Care Providers

The primary purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of CADS by primary care providers (PCPs) for their patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) changes the quality of care relative to a "usual care" group in terms of objective outcome measures of glycemic control (e.g., A1c, mean blood glucose, frequency of hypoglycemic episodes) and in terms of subjective ratings by patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The CADS software integrates the patient's home blood glucose data with appropriate laboratory data (e.g. A1c, liver function, kidney function), demographic data (age, gender), current and previous medications, and active/inactive medical diagnoses. The software makes a recommendation about what medication changes are appropriate with potential alternates. Providers with their patients are block randomized into CADS or "Usual Care" for 1 year.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20889
        • Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Non-specialist physician (general internist or family practitioner), nurse practitioner, physicians assistant
  • Absence of orders for deployment or permanent change of station
  • Willingness to recruit up to 19 patients prior to randomization
  • Willingness to deliver "usual care" as defined in Section 6.3.2 of the protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Specialist physicians
  • Orders for deployment or permanent change of station
  • Unwillingness to recruit up to 19 patients prior to randomization
  • No prior experience with management of type 2 diabetes in adults
  • Unwillingness to deliver "usual care" as defined in Section 6.3.2 of the protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Computer-Assisted Decision Support
These providers will use the CADS program to treat their enrolled patients.
The CADS software makes a recommendation about what medication changes are appropriate with potential alternates. CADS providers will either "accept" or "reject" the recommendation by the software.Providers with their patients are block randomized into CADS or "Usual Care" for 1 year. Patients associated with a CADS provider will upload their blood glucose data weekly and perform a 7-point glucose profile once per month. They will report major hypoglycemic events and hospitalizations at the time of their quarterly visit. Those getting "usual care" will be seen quarterly and will do self-monitoring of blood glucose and have A1c tests as determined by the provider but no less than twice a year.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in A1c
Time Frame: baseline, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months
Change is A1c will be measured 5 times over the course of the study to compare the patients for whom the provider is using CADS to those patients whose providers are delivering "usual care".
baseline, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major events
Time Frame: ongoing
The number of major ("severe") hypoglycemic events whether subjective (undocumented) or objective (SMBG or other confirmation, need for intervention, seizure, coma), and emergency room visits for DM-related causes.
ongoing
Other DM-related events
Time Frame: ongoing
Number of ER visits for DM-related causes, DM-related hospitalizations and hospital days, and DM-related clinic visits.
ongoing
Glucose measures
Time Frame: baseline, 12, 24, 36, 48 months
Mean pre-prandial glucose, mean post-prandial glucose, post-prandial glucose excursions
baseline, 12, 24, 36, 48 months
Blood pressure
Time Frame: baseline, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months
Clinically significant or statistically detectable changes in BP
baseline, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months
Lipids
Time Frame: baseline, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months
Clinically significant or statistically detectable changes in lipid profile.
baseline, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months
Patient satisfaction with treatment
Time Frame: basline and 48 months
Clinically significant or statistically detectable changes in satisfaction with treatment as measured by the DTSQ.
basline and 48 months
Quality of life
Time Frame: baseline and 48 months
Clinically significant or statistically detectable changes in quality of life for patients with DM as measured by the SF-8.
baseline and 48 months
Degree of Acceptance
Time Frame: baseline and 48 months
The degree of acceptance of CADS by PCPs as measured by a technical assessment questionnaire.
baseline and 48 months
Acceptance of uploading data
Time Frame: baseline, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months
The degree of acceptance of uploading the glucose meters by patients as measured by a technical assessment questionnaire.
baseline, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months
Demographic variables
Time Frame: baseline and 48 months
The relationship of the primary and/or secondary outcomes to the type of provider, board-certification or eligibility, years in practice, age and gender.
baseline and 48 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert A Vigersky, M.D., Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

July 24, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 25, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type II Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on Computer-Assisted Decision Support

Subscribe