Social Media And Risk-reduction Training for Infant Care Practices (SMART) (SMART)

January 9, 2019 updated by: Rachel Moon, MD, University of Virginia
The goal of this proposal is to address serious and ongoing challenges related to adherence to public health recommendations known to reduce the risk of SIDS. Adherence has reached a plateau at an unacceptably low level both in the overall US population and especially in Black infants leading to a halt in the decline in infant mortality and a widening in the racial disparity in infant mortality. The current proposal is a collaborative effort that will capitalize on the extensive experience of the investigators in studying barriers to adherence to safe sleep practices to develop two complementary, culturally competent, intervention strategies and to test the effectiveness of each strategy as well as both strategies in combination. Innovative aspects of the Social Media and Risk-reduction Training of Infant Care Practices (SMART) study include its: 1) unique collaboration of leaders in the field; 2) leveraging of the currently operational infant care practices study infrastructure and hospitals; 3) use of two complementary interventions with the potential for synergistic impact; 4) use of social marketing strategies;5) use of mobile technology (mHealth) to deliver messages; and 6) collaboration with community resources and expertise. The SMART study will have four arms in which 16 hospitals are randomly assigned to one of the following study groups: 1) Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Breastfeeding mHealth messaging; 2) Breastfeeding Nursery Education and Safe Sleep mHealth messaging; 3) Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Safe Sleep mHealth messaging; 4) Breastfeeding Nursery Education and Breastfeeding mHealth messaging. A total of 1600 mothers will be recruited (100/hospital), with 400 in each study group. The primary aim is to assess the effectiveness of the interventions aimed at promoting safe sleep practices compared with the breastfeeding control interventions. The secondary aim is to assess potential mediating factors that may explain the intervention effects on infant care practices and that may inform areas for future improved intervention approaches. With the successful completion of the SMART study, effectiveness data will have been provided for two interventions to improve adherence to safe sleep practices that are practical to disseminate nationally in multiple diverse settings.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

FOA PAR-11-242 seeks research that will improve the design, implementation, and effectiveness of interventions to prevent Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) and unintentional injury-related infant deaths associated with the sleep environment. The SMART (Social Media and Risk Reduction Training) Infant Care Practices proposal is a collaborative effort among researchers who collectively have generated much of the data on infant care practices that underlie the need for this FOA, and who have access to an already existing and operational infrastructure that permits performance of a large randomized clinical trial to study preventative interventions. This infrastructure was created for the NICHD-funded SAFE Infant Care Practices study, for which mothers are being recruited in 2011, 2012, and 2013 at a nationally-representative group of birth hospitals, with completion of infant care practice surveys at 2-5 months after birth. These hospitals, which will complete their participation in SAFE during 2013, are geographically and culturally diverse, will have had 3 years of baseline infant care practice data collected, and have a proven track record of successful recruitment. We will use our collective extensive experience studying barriers to adherence to safe sleep practices to develop two complementary, culturally competent intervention strategies and to test the effectiveness of each strategy, as well as both strategies in combination. Both of the proposed intervention strategies, described below, were selected largely because they can be used in diverse populations and offer the potential to be rapidly disseminated nationwide.

Nursery Education: A nursery-based training program will be modeled after our successful pilot study and informed by our collective research on barriers to adopting safe sleep practices. We will use social marketing strategies to capture the attention of nursing staff and empower them to improve safe sleep practice modeling and messaging received by mothers and extended families during the post-partum hospital stay.

mHealth: We will use an innovative approach, using mobile messaging, that applies expertise in social marketing to provide multiple short culturally competent videos delivered via email from the end of the post-partum hospital stay through 2 months of age. This strategy will leverage the internet as a powerful tool to access health information, and mobile devices (e.g., cell phones), which have made internet access possible for many, particularly those who are younger, minority, and from lower socioeconomic and educational backgrounds. Using technology to deliver health-related information is likely to be a well-accepted and effective strategy, particularly among minority and low-income populations. Indeed, studies demonstrate that email may be an effective, inexpensive, and time-efficient strategy to transmit health information.

For each of the safe sleep practice interventions (Nursery Education and mHealth), we will develop control interventions in which the Nursery Education or mHealth approach is used to promote breastfeeding. We have chosen breastfeeding as the control intervention because it 1) is not expected to impact endpoints critical to the assessment of the safe sleep practice intervention, and 2) provides health promoting messages to control mothers.

In the SMART study, we propose a 4-arm RCT in which 16 hospitals completing participation in the SAFE study are randomly assigned to one of the following groups (with Safe Sleep Intervention and/or Breastfeeding Control): 1) Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Breastfeeding mHealth messaging; 2) Breastfeeding Nursery Education and Safe Sleep mHealth messaging; 3) Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Safe Sleep mHealth messaging; and 4) Breastfeeding Nursery Education and Breastfeeding mHealth messaging. We are uniquely positioned to design, implement and test the effectiveness of these interventions in a methodologically rigorous way and propose the following specific aims: Primary Aim: To assess the effectiveness of the interventions aimed at promoting safe sleep practices compared with the breastfeeding controls.

Hypothesis:For each recommended safe sleep practice (supine sleep position, not bed sharing, pacifier use, avoiding use of soft bedding), when controlling for other variables, there will be: a) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep Nursery Education; b) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep mHealth messaging; and c) compared to mothers who received either Safe Sleep Nursery Education or Safe Sleep mHealth messaging alone, an increased adherence for mothers who received both Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Safe Sleep mHealth messaging.

Secondary Aim: Assess potential mediating factors that may explain the intervention effects on infant care practices and that may inform areas for future improved intervention approaches.

Hypothesis: Changes in variables within each of the domains of the Theory of Planned Behavior (Attitudes/Beliefs, Social Norms, Perceived Control) will be mediators of the effectiveness of safe sleep interventions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1600

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- mothers must live in the US, deliver a healthy infant in one of the study hospitals, plan to take her baby home with her, and be able to receive emails.

Exclusion Criteria:

- mothers who are not English speaking, whose infant is deceased, those not having custody of the infant, and those whose infants require hospitalization for more than 1 week, or have an ongoing medical problem requiring subspecialty care and mothers who are unable to receive email messages.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Safe Sleep Edu and Breastfeeding mHealth
Participants will receive Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Breastfeeding Mobile Health messaging
Nursery-based program for safe sleep
Mobile messaging to provide multiple short culturally competent videos to promote breastfeeding delivered via email.
Other: Breastfeeding Edu and Safe Sleep mHealth
Participants will receive the Breastfeeding Nursery Education and the Safe Sleep Mobile Health messaging
Nursery-based program to promote breastfeeding
Mobile messaging to provide multiple short culturally competent videos to promote safe sleep practices delivered via email.
Other: Safe Sleep Edu and Safe Sleep mHealth
Participants will receive Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Safe Sleep Mobile Health messaging
Nursery-based program for safe sleep
Mobile messaging to provide multiple short culturally competent videos to promote safe sleep practices delivered via email.
Other: Breastfeed Edu and Breastfeed mHealth
Participants will receive Breastfeeding Nursery Education and Breastfeeding Mobile Health messaging
Mobile messaging to provide multiple short culturally competent videos to promote breastfeeding delivered via email.
Nursery-based program to promote breastfeeding

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence With Recommended Supine Sleep Position
Time Frame: 6 months
Hypothesis:For supine sleep position, when controlling for other variables, there will be: a) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep Nursery Education; b) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep mHealth messaging; and c) compared to mothers who received either Safe Sleep Nursery Education or Safe Sleep mHealth messaging alone, an increased adherence for mothers who received both Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Safe Sleep mHealth messaging. Outcome measures will be assessed by survey conducted when the infant is 2-5 months of age.
6 months
Adherence With Recommended Roomsharing Without Bed Sharing
Time Frame: 6 months
Hypothesis: For roomsharing without bed sharing, when controlling for other variables, there will be: a) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep Nursery Education; b) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep mHealth messaging; and c) compared to mothers who received either Safe Sleep Nursery Education or Safe Sleep mHealth messaging alone, an increased adherence for mothers who received both Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Safe Sleep mHealth messaging. Outcome measures will be assessed by survey conducted when the infant is 2-5 months of age.
6 months
Adherence With Recommended Pacifier Use
Time Frame: 6 months
Hypothesis: For pacifier use, when controlling for other variables, there will be: a) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep Nursery Education; b) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep mHealth messaging; and c) compared to mothers who received either Safe Sleep Nursery Education or Safe Sleep mHealth messaging alone, an increased adherence for mothers who received both Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Safe Sleep mHealth messaging. Outcome measures will be assessed by survey conducted when the infant is 2-5 months of age.
6 months
Adherence With Recommended Avoiding Use of Soft Bedding
Time Frame: 6 months
Hypothesis: For each recommended avoidance of soft bedding use, when controlling for other variables, there will be: a) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep Nursery Education; b) an increased adherence for mothers who received Safe Sleep mHealth messaging; and c) compared to mothers who received either Safe Sleep Nursery Education or Safe Sleep mHealth messaging alone, an increased adherence for mothers who received both Safe Sleep Nursery Education and Safe Sleep mHealth messaging. Outcome measures will be assessed by survey conducted when the infant is 2-5 months of age.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Reporting Positive/Nonpositive Attitudes Towards Supine Sleep
Time Frame: 6 months
Questions assessing attitudes toward sleep position included the mothers' ratings regarding if she believed that each infant sleep position (back, side, stomach) made the baby healthy, safer, more comfortable, and kept the baby from choking. Positive attitudes were defined as having positive attitudes toward the recommended behavior AND not having positive attitudes toward other behaviors (e.g., having positive attitudes towards both supine and side sleep would lead to a categorization of not having positive attitudes towards supine sleep only).
6 months
Number of Participants Reporting Positive/Nonpositive Attitudes Towards Roomsharing Without Bedsharing.
Time Frame: 6 months
Questions assessing attitudes toward sleep location (bedsharing, roomsharing without bedsharing) assessed whether the location was pleasant for the baby and/or mother, safer for the baby, more comfortable for the baby and/or mother, and kept the baby from choking. Positive attitudes were defined as having positive attitudes toward the recommended behavior AND not having positive attitudes toward other behaviors (e.g., having positive attitudes towards both bedsharing and not bedsharing would lead to a categorization of not having positive attitudes towards bedsharing only).
6 months
Number of Participants Reporting Positive/Nonpositive Social Norms re Supine Sleep
Time Frame: 6 months
Social norms were assessed by asking if the people most important to the mother thought that the baby should sleep in each position or location. Positive social norms were defined as having positive norms toward the recommended behavior AND not having positive norms toward other behaviors.
6 months
Number of Participants Reporting Positive/Nonpositive Social Norms re: Roomsharing Without Bedsharing.
Time Frame: 6 months
Social norms were assessed by asking if the people most important to the mother thought that the baby should sleep in each position or location. Positive social norms were defined as having positive norms toward the recommended behavior AND not having positive norms toward other behaviors
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Corwin, MD, Boston University
  • Principal Investigator: Eve R Colson, M.D., Yale University
  • Principal Investigator: Fern R Hauck, M.D., M.S., University of Virginia
  • Principal Investigator: Rachel Moon, MD, University of Virginia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

October 25, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1R01HD072815-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Risk Reduction

Clinical Trials on Safe Sleep Nursery Education

3
Subscribe