Identification of Outcome Relevant Indicators in Routine Data

December 21, 2020 updated by: Claudia Spies, Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Retrospective Analysis for the Identification of Outcome Relevant Indicators ("Patterns") in Routine Data and Investigation of the Influence on Patient-centered Outcome for a Data-driven Improvement of Quality-based Treatment of Perioperative and Intensive Care Patients

The availability of electronic documentation systems in patient care means that large amounts of clinical routine data are available from which conclusions can be drawn for improving patient care. Compared to conventional research approaches, a data science-oriented approach offers the possibility of identifying patterns in routine data ("pattern recognition") that are relevant for patient-centered outcomes.

Numerous projects and sub-projects can be evaluated from this data set.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The patterns that are relevant for patient-centered outcomes can be combinations of different parameters (e.g. vital signs, laboratory values, previous illnesses), which in themselves do not necessarily have a pathogenic effect, but in a specific combination may have a high relevance for the patient-centered outcome.

This project pursues as research goal the anesthesiological and intensive care risk reduction. To this end, the existing data sets of routine care are to be used to identify outcome-relevant patterns in order to derive recommendations for improving treatment in line with the patient's wishes. Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and Quality Indicators (QIs) in combination with the data of routine clinical care will be used as a basis. The approach outlined is closely linked to the development of quality-based treatment structures. In order to be able to offer medical treatment at a high level, associated processes must be known and operationalized, i.e. measurable. QIs (quality indicators) are an established instrument for measuring individual dimensions of treatment quality, and our clinic is a leading participant in this process at both national and international level (see Spies et al. Guidelines for Delirium, Analgesia and Sedation). The mapping of quality-based treatment structures as SOPs (Standard Operating Procedures) is also essential in this context (see Spies et al. SOPs in Anesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Thieme Verlag). By applying data science-based methods, this study pursues the overall goal of supporting the transfer of evidence-based findings in the form of QIs and SOPs into patient care.

Numerous projects and sub-projects can be evaluated from this data set.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1000000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 12203
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CBF), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
    • Berlin
      • Berlin,, Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Claudia Spies, MD
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Felix Balzer, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 120 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

At the department for anesthesiology with a focus on operative intensive care medicine, approximately 60,000 anaesthesias are performed annually. The data sets of documentation systems used in this context date back approximately to the year 2006 and are to be considered for the development of data science-based models depending on selected QI or SOPs.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: 0 to 120 years
  • Gender: female, male, diverse
  • Electronically documented anesthesiological or intensive care treatment in the HIS (Hospital Information System) and PDMS (Patient Data Management System) of the Charité (Dep. for Anesthesiology with focus on operative intensive care, CCM/CVK/CBF) since 2006

Exclusion Criteria:

-none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional status
Time Frame: 01.01.2016-31.12.2024
The functional status of the patient is measured by routine score data. The scores, which measure physical, role, and social functioning, and mobility reflect worse/better outcome depending on the score construction.
01.01.2016-31.12.2024

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Morbidity
Time Frame: 01.01.2016-31.12.2024
Morbidity is evaluated by International Classification of Diseases (ICD) (10th version). /Operation codes (OPS)
01.01.2016-31.12.2024
Mortality I
Time Frame: 01.01.2016-31.12.2024
Mortality is measured by inhouse mortality
01.01.2016-31.12.2024
Mortality II
Time Frame: 01.01.2016-31.12.2025
Mortality is measured by long-term mortality (1 year)
01.01.2016-31.12.2025
Accounting data
Time Frame: 01.01.2016-31.12.2024
Accounting data are providid by the controlling department
01.01.2016-31.12.2024

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 3, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 23, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • QUALIPATT

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesiological Risk Reduction

3
Subscribe