Effects of Frequent Decision Making Among Patients With Serious Illnesses

Pilot Study of Repeated Decision Making in Patients

Decision making capacity fatigues after repeated decisions similar to skeletal muscle. The result is decision fatigue, in which subsequent decisions are altered toward the status quo. Patients are at risk for decision fatigue yet it has not been studied. The Investigator proposes a randomized study in the outpatient setting in patients at high risk for needing to make complex decisions, in an effort to determine the impact of decision fatigue on participant self-control and subsequent choices.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Chemotherapy
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Hypothetical scenarios and related decisions

Detailed Description

Just as skeletal muscle fatigues after repeated use, decision-making capacity fatigues when repeated choices are made. This phenomenon, in which people experience diminished concentration and willpower after repeated decision-making, is termed decision fatigue. (1) People experiencing decision fatigue are more likely to bias subsequent choices toward the status quo. By choosing the status quo, the decision-maker reserves the option to make an alternate choice at a later time, thereby preserving possibilities. Patients and their surrogates often make complex medical decisions for which they may have little experience. Although clearly at high risk, decision fatigue has not been studied this population. To elucidate these questions, we propose a four arm study of patients in a population at high risk for making complex decisions. Participants will be randomly assigned to varied levels of decision making effort to assess for the development of resultant decision fatigue and whether it alters subsequent decisions.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 66
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Pennsylvania
    • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
      • Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• aplastic anemia, multiple myeloma, myelodysplastic syndrome, acute myeloid leukemia, stage IIIB or IV lung cancer, mesothelioma and/or stage IIIB or IV gastrointestinal cancer (pancreatic, biliary, esophageal, gastric, hepatocellular, colon), stage IV melanoma
• All participants must be over the age 18
• All participants must be fluent in English

Exclusion Criteria:

• Any medical condition known to alter Stroop performance; i.e. significant visual impairment, blind or colorblind, sedating medications during appointment, history of cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack (TIA), seizure disorder, dementia or traumatic head injury with loss of consciousness
• Patients will also be ineligible if they are illiterate
• Patients will be ineligible if they have either tracheostomy or are currently on hemodialysis as these would significantly alter responses to the hypothetical medical scenarios/decisions

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Other
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

4

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: DLST Only; Patients will complete the Stroop test then answer the hypothetical life sustaining therapy (LST)
Experimental: Contemplate only; Patients will contemplate each of the 3 scenarios but not make any decisions, then complete the Stroop test and answer the hypothetical LST question	Other: Hypothetical scenarios and related decisions; Patients are exposed to three hypothetical medical scenarios that require varying levels of decision making. We will be assessing how this experience alters their subsequent choice to forego life sustaining therapy.
Experimental: Decide with advice; Patients will make decisions on 4 scenarios with physician advice, then complete the Stroop test and answer the hypothetical LST question. Within this arm, patients will receive two positive recommendations (i.e. to go ahead with the intervention) and two negative recommendations (i.e. to decline the intervention). These positive and negative recommendations will be randomly assigned upon study enrollment. With four hypothetical scenarios, there are six possible options for recommendation variations.	Other: Hypothetical scenarios and related decisions; Patients are exposed to three hypothetical medical scenarios that require varying levels of decision making. We will be assessing how this experience alters their subsequent choice to forego life sustaining therapy.
Experimental: Decide without advice; Patients will make decisions on 4 scenarios without physician advice, then complete the Stroop test and the hypothetical LST question.	Other: Hypothetical scenarios and related decisions; Patients are exposed to three hypothetical medical scenarios that require varying levels of decision making. We will be assessing how this experience alters their subsequent choice to forego life sustaining therapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Stroop test score	Measurement of score will be done at the conclusion of instrument completion. The Stroop test is a standard measure of self control that requires three tasks. The last task is the most difficult where the participant must suppress the urge to read the word which is the easier task and instead say the color it is printed in. Standard scoring is the number correct in the W trial minus the CW trials. This data will be collected immediately following completion.	Approximately 15 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Evidence of status quo bias	Evidence of status quo bias as assessed by hypothetical decision to limit life sustaining therapy or to continue treatment. To assess for status quo bias, we will use the following technique: after the initial four hypothetical questions and Stroop testing, participants will be asked a hypothetical question about life sustaining therapy (LST). In the question, continuing life sustaining therapy will be counted as maintaining the status quo. This is based on current norms in American health care where life sustaining therapy is continued until a patient or surrogate specifically request otherwise.	Approximately 10 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of Pennsylvania
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Scott D. Halpern, MD, PhD, University of Pennsylvania

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Vohs KD, Baumeister RF, Schmeichel BJ, Twenge JM, Nelson NM, Tice DM. Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: a limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active initiative. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 May;94(5):883-98. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.883.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: November 1, 2012
• Primary Completion (Actual): May 1, 2013
• Study Completion (Actual): May 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: October 31, 2012
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 2, 2012
• First Posted (Estimate): November 6, 2012

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): August 15, 2017
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 11, 2017
• Last Verified: August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Decision fatigue
• Other Study ID Numbers: UPenn -816696