Assessment of Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Adalimumab and High Dose Methotrexate in Routine Clinical Practice

July 1, 2019 updated by: AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)

Assessment of Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Adalimumab and High Dose Methotrexate in Routine Clinical Practice (Combo Study; Adalimumab With High Dose MTX)

This was a single-arm, multicenter, open label, prospective cohort study (post-marketing observational study) to determine the effectiveness and safety of adalimumab in combination with high-dose methotrexate (≥12 mg/week) in participants with rheumatoid arthritis in a routine clinical setting in Japan.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Study assessments occurred at baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 52, Week 76, and Week 104. Most participants received 40 mg of adalimumab every other week during the study. Two participants started at 40 mg of adalimumab every other week, and increased to 80 mg every other week. A few participants had a different dose regimen: 40 mg every three weeks for 3 participants; 40 mg every four weeks for 1 participant; and 40 mg every other week with a switch to 50 mg every three weeks for 4 subjects.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

346

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 99 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants with rheumatoid arthritis treated in a daily clinical setting, who received adalimumab (and high dose methotrexate [≥12 mg/week]), were observed prospectively.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

The participants of this study were rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients for whom adalimumab was prescribed. They must have met the following conditions:

  • Disease duration of RA ≤2 years
  • Methotrexate (MTX) administration ≥3 months prior to starting adalimumab
  • Dose of MTX ≥12mg/week
  • Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)-C-reactive protein (CRP) score >3.2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who had been previously treated with biologics (including tumor necrosis factor [TNF] inhibitors and others)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Participants treated with adalimumab
40 mg adalimumab via subcutaneous (SC) injection every other week (eow) for 104 weeks
Pre-filled syringe, administered by subcutaneous injection
Other Names:
  • ABT-D2E7
  • Humira

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With a Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Score of <2.6 at Week 52
Time Frame: At Week 52
The Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; mm/hr) or C-reactive protein (CRP; mg/dL) level, and the participant's assessment of global disease activity (on a visual analog scale [VAS] from 0 to 10 cm) are included in the DAS28 score. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28 score >5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score <3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score <2.6 indicates clinical remission.
At Week 52

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score ≤ 2.8 at Week 104
Time Frame: At Week 104
The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index for assessing rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, the participant's global assessment of disease activity (on a visual analog scale [VAS] from 0 to 10 cm), and a physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm) are summed to yield the total score. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. Remission is defined as a CDAI score ≤ 2.8.
At Week 104
Percentage of Participants With a Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score ≤ 3.3 at Week 104
Time Frame: At Week 104
The SDAI is a validated measure of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, global disease activity assessed by the participant on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 10 (cm), global disease activity assessed by an investigator on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 10 (cm), and serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP; mg/dL) were included in the SDAI score. Scores on the SDAI range from 0 to 86. An SDAI score ≥26.1 indicates high disease activity, an SDAI score between 11.1 and 26.0 indicates moderate disease activity, an SDAI score between 3.4 and 11.0 indicates low disease activity, and an SDAI score ≤3.3 indicates clinical remission.
At Week 104
Percentage of Participants With a Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score < 0.5 at Week 104
Time Frame: At Week 104
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is a self-reported assessment specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. HAQ remission indicating normal physical function is defined as HAQ-DI < 0.5.
At Week 104
Mean Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Index Score at Week 104
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 104
The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a participant-answered questionnaire scoring 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. For each dimension the participant is asked for a three-level assessment of their health on the current day: "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), "extreme problems" (3). EQ-5D health states, defined by the EQ-5D descriptive system, are converted into a single summary index by applying a formula that essentially attaches values (also called QOL weights or QOL utilities) to each of the levels in each dimension. EQ-5D Summary Index values range from -0.11 (worst health state) to 1.00 (perfect health state). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Baseline and Week 104
Percentage of Participants With a Change From Baseline of ≤ 1.0 in Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 104
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 104
The van der Heijde modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of the level of joint damage. X-rays of hands and feet were taken at the visit. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 398 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.
Baseline and Week 104

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 11, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 16, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

April 16, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

November 29, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2019

Last Verified

June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Adalimumab

3
Subscribe