Rehabilitation After Lumbar Disc Surgery: Exercise Therapy and Brief Educational Intervention

August 7, 2019 updated by: Haukeland University Hospital

Rehabilitation After Lumbar Surgery

Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery (prolapse) focuses on various elements such as endurance, strength, stretching and information. Evidence concludes that it is not harmful to return to activity after lumbar disc surgery, and restrictions to activities after these operations are today more or less nonexistent. Some studies have shown that high intensity programs might be more effective, but they are probably more expensive. In recent years cognitive interventions have received more attention in rehabilitation programs after lumbar disc surgery. The cognitive approach is focused on providing patient knowledge to reduce uncertainty so that he or she can understand what is important after lumbar disc surgery so that belief in self-efficacy increases. A goal of the rehabilitation is to get the patient to resume normal activities. Reviews ask for how much treatment are needed in a rehabilitation program after lumbar disc surgery.

The study will be a randomized clinical trial. The study will compare two different post-operative rehabilitation programs (general information or general information + exercise therapy). Both groups will begin treatment 1 day after surgery. Subjects in exercise therapy group are supposed to continue with exercises 3 months.

In this study the following hypothesis will be studied:

  1. Brief intervention, an educational model, alone after lumbar disc surgery do have the same effect on pain in legs and low back as brief intervention, an educational model, combined with exercise therapy.
  2. Exercises which are instructed after lumbar disc surgery in a rehabilitation program, are being done by the patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hordaland
      • Bergen, Hordaland, Norway
        • Haukeland University Hospital, Ortopedisk klinikk, Kysthospitalet i Hagevik

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with lumbar disc prolapse with radicular pain
  • Age between 18 and 60

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous lumbar disc surgery (prolapse)
  • Spondyloarthritis
  • Arthritis
  • Systematic disease
  • Heart disease
  • Does not understand Norwegian language, spoken or in writing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Brief intervention only
Brief intervention, an educational model, consists of information
The goal of the the brief intervention is to provide the patient knowledge to reduce uncertainty so that he or she can understand what is important after lumbar disc surgery so that belief in self-efficacy increases.
Active Comparator: Exercise group
Brief educational intervention combined with exercise therapy
The goal of the the brief intervention is to provide the patient knowledge to reduce uncertainty so that he or she can understand what is important after lumbar disc surgery so that belief in self-efficacy increases.
Patients are instructed to do prescribed exercises the first 3 months after surgery, and to log when they do these

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline in pain in the low back and the legs at 6-8 weeks and 1 year postsurgery
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-8 weeks postsurgery and 1 year postsurgery
Baseline, 6-8 weeks postsurgery and 1 year postsurgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Disability and beliefs about the condition
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-8 weeks postsurgery and 1 year postsurgery
Baseline, 6-8 weeks postsurgery and 1 year postsurgery
Change from baseline in Oswestry Disability Index at 6-8 weeks and 1 year postsurgery
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-8 weeks postsurgery and 1 year postsurgery
Baseline, 6-8 weeks postsurgery and 1 year postsurgery
Change from baseline in Tampa scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-13) at 6-8 weeks and 1 year postsurgery
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-8 weeks postsurgery and 1 year postsurgery
Baseline, 6-8 weeks postsurgery and 1 year postsurgery
Change from baseline in Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (physical activity) at 6-8 weeks and 1 year postsurgery
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-8 weeks postsurgery and 1 year postsurgery
Baseline, 6-8 weeks postsurgery and 1 year postsurgery
Change from baseline in anticipation to return to work at 6-8 weeks postsurgery
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-8 weeks postsurgery postsurgery
Baseline and 6-8 weeks postsurgery postsurgery
Change from baseline in health condition at 6-8 weeks and 1 year postsurgery
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-8 weeks postsurgery and 1 year postsurgery
Baseline, 6-8 weeks postsurgery and 1 year postsurgery
Change from baseline in health condition rating at 6-8 weeks and 1 year postsurgery
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-8 weeks postsurgery and 1 year postsurgery
Baseline, 6-8 weeks postsurgery and 1 year postsurgery
Recidive prolapse
Time Frame: 1 year postsurgery
1 year postsurgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Kari Indrekvam, phd, MD, Helse Bergen HF, Haukeland University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

January 30, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2012/1861

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prolapse

Clinical Trials on Brief intervention, an educational model

Subscribe