Linkage to Care and Treatment of Chronic HBV Patients (HBV)

October 23, 2024 updated by: Wai-Kay Seto, The University of Hong Kong

Achieving Linkage to Retention and Treatment After Territory-wide Screening and Care Referral for Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

Chronic hepatitis B remains the leading cause of liver related mortality and morbidity globally and locally. Countries have been formulating initiatives to meet the WHO target of eliminating viral hepatitis by 2030. However, data on the most important aspect of management of chronic hepatitis B, namely linkage to care and treatment, remains scarce. In order to achieve the WHO goal, treatment rate of eligible patients should reach 80%.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Diagnosing patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and establishing linkage to treatment is important in achieving the World Health Organization (WHO) objectives in eliminating HBV as a public health threat by 2030. Global HBV diagnosis rates and treatment rates among eligible patients were 10% and 5% respectively. In Mainland China and Hong Kong, estimated diagnosis and treatment coverage were 19-27% and 11-22% respectively, similarly much lower than the WHO 2030 goals of 90% for diagnosis and 80% for treatment. A recent modeling study demonstrated that even if a modest 50% diagnosis rate was achieved in China, this will result in a 19% mortality decline, with 2.1 million deaths averted. Currently, HBV screening is recommended for persons born in regions with a HBV prevalence of 22%. This includes the vast majority of East Asian countries.

In the HBV care continuum, identifying patients and arranging linkage to care is only the first step. Long-term retention of patients is critical, especially since with disease progression, treatment eligibility rates can increase by 30% after 3 years of follow-up. Nonetheless, there has been a paucity of data on HBV care continuum retention rates after referrai and linkage. A US-based study did found that among diagnosed patients, only 63.2% achieved linkage to referral, and only 44.1% remained retained in clinical care after at least three clinic visits. Another study in Italy found a higher retention of 60% after 5 years; besides African ethnicity and concomitant HIV infection, the study failed to identify any predictors of retention failure, yet 74.8% of retained patients subsequently required treatment. There has been otherwise no published data on linkage to retention rates in endemic regions including East Asia, and on whether the care continuum cascade can successfully link referral to treatment.

Our center previously conducted a territory-wide prevalence study of HBV, and out of >10,000 screened participants, the investigators identified 803 hepatitis B surface antigen (HBSAg)-positive individuals, with a mean age of 53.7 (135.8) years (36.7% male). As part of linkage to care, all patients were subsequently referred to their respective geographical cluster hospital. The investigators recently performed a follow-up telephone survey of the 803 patients, asking on their status of clinical follow-up and liver-related treatment. Our preliminary data found a retention rate of only 37.1% after 2 years post-referral. However, among retained patients, 51.2% were already started on anti-HBV treatment, suggesting that high rates of treatment eligibility may also exist in unretained patients. Hence, to enhance linkage to treatment, linkage to retention rates will need improvement.

There is emerging evidence on the effect of different interventions in improving the care continuum of viral hepatitis, although the majority of evidence is concentrated in hepatitis C virus and not HBV. Clinical reminders have been demonstrated to be the most effective method to improve testing rates; such reminders may also be useful to in improving clinic attendance and retention. On the other hand, the data on educational materials is less consistent. Data was concentrated in Asian migrants in North America, with some based on non-randomized studies, and could be susceptible to selection, attrition and reporting bias.

Interventions using social media and mobile technology may be promising. Experience from engaging patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection have found social media effective in reaching out to marginalized individuals, especially among those of a younger age. It would be interesting to see if educational videos disseminated on mobile devices via social media can improve linkage to retention and treatment for HBV.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

803

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Department of Medicine and Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • CHB (HBV DNA+ or HBsAg+ for more than 6 months)
  • Age >18
  • Treatment naive at initial presentation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior HBV treatment
  • Organ transplant or other immunosuppression
  • HIV, HDV, HCV co-infection
  • Decompensated or HCC patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Receiving an educational intervention
Receiving the educational video link on their mobile device
Patient not receiving any educational intervention
Other Names:
  • No educational intervention
No Intervention: No educational intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The effect of education intervention on rate of retention in care in chronic hepatitis B patients identified from a territory wide screening program
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The treatment rate in chronic hepatitis B patients up to 5 years after diagnosis
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years
The rate of viral suppression in chronic hepatitis B patients up to 5 years after diagnosis
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years
The rate of complication in chronic hepatitis B patients up to 5 years after diagnosis
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years
Factors affecting rate of retention in care from patient perspective in the form of questionnaire survey
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 3, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe