Lower Extremity Regional Anesthesia and Infrainguinal Bypass Grafting

August 10, 2023 updated by: University of Nebraska
In this investigation, the investigators will attempt to demonstrate that patients who have received nerve blocks (regional anesthesia) prior to open surgical vascular bypass of the lower extremities (infrainguinal bypass grafting) will have improved surgical outcomes namely a reduction in the rates of death, wound infection, graft thrombosis, graft revision, and amputation. As well, the investigators anticipate that patients who have undergone regional anesthesia for infrainguinal bypass grafting will have improved secondary outcomes with respect to a decreased length of stay, narcotic consumption, nausea and vomiting, post-operative cognitive dysfunction, major cardiac events, post-operative pain, and hyperglycemic episodes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background The post-operative benefits of regional anesthesia have been described in patients undergoing vascular access surgery(1, 2). Some of the benefits that have been identified are improved vascular flow, decreased thrombosis rates, and early maturation of grafts(2). It is speculated that these benefits can be mainly attributed to sympathetic blockade by regional anesthesia. Recent literature review has not identified any prior studies which have attempted to prospectively identify if there are improved surgical outcomes in patients undergoing revascularization surgery when regional anesthesia is utilized. However, Kashyap et al. reported that regional anesthesia may decrease the incidence of perioperative thrombosis in patients who had undergone infra-popliteal revascularization surgery over a 20 year period(3). In this investigation we will attempt to ascertain whether or not there will be improved surgical outcomes namely a reduction in the rates of death, wound infection, graft thrombosis, graft revision, and amputation. As well, we anticipate that patients who have undergone regional anesthesia for infrainguinal bypass grafting will have improved secondary outcomes with respect to a decreased length of stay, narcotic consumption, nausea and vomiting, post-operative cognitive dysfunction, major cardiac events, post-operative pain, and hyperglycemic episodes.

Methods After Investigational Review Board approval, written informed consent will be obtained from 20 patients undergoing fem-popliteal bypass surgery at University of Nebraska Medical Center and enrolled in our prospective cohort registry. Patients will be excluded from the study if age is less than 19 years, allergies to amide anesthetics, inability to undergo general anesthesia, acute limb ischemia, any existence of contraindications to regional anesthesia in the presence of antiplatelet or anticoagulative drugs, or evidence of gross neurological dysfunction of the lower extremity. Baseline health data of the patient will be recorded. Ultrasound will be performed with a linear 10- to 13-Megahertz probe while performing the nerve block. Standard American Society of Anesthesiology monitors will be applied and the patient sedated at the discretion of the anesthetic team. Complications such as vascular puncture, pain on injection, or systemic toxicity will be recorded. A perineural dosing regimen for the regional blocks will be as follows: (femoral block) 20cc of 0.5% ropivicaine and (sub-gluteal posterior sciatic block) 20cc of 0.2% ropivicaine. Epinephrine will be withheld from the local anesthetic in order to prevent the potential of further ischemic complications. The patient will then undergo general anesthesia at the discretion of the anesthetic team. Any anesthetic or surgical complication will be recorded during the OR interval. The type of graft utilized and specific location of arterial intervention will be recorded.

Following surgery, the patient will be monitored and data recorded daily while the patient is recovering in the hospital. Primary outcomes which will be recorded include: death, wound infection, graft thrombosis, graft revision, and amputation. Secondary outcomes which will be recorded are pain scores, nausea and vomiting, 24 hour narcotic consumption, graft failure (defined as any occlusion requiring return to operating room), any related return to the OR for the index procedure, any major adverse cardiac events (MACE), administration of warfarin or antiplatelet medications, average 24 hour blood sugar, creatinine levels, postoperative cognitive dysfunction, and requirement of supplemental oxygen upon discharge from the PACU. As well, the patient will be queried for resumption of tobacco products. The patient's length of hospital stay will be recorded.

On discharge there will be continued surveillance for the following primary outcomes: death, wound infection, graft thrombosis, graft revision, and amputation. The secondary outcomes which will be recorded are as follows: presence of pain at rest, pain on ambulation, continued administration of anticoagulants or antiplatelets, graft failure (defined as any occlusion requiring return to operating room), any related return to the OR for the index procedure, any major adverse cardiac events (MACE), average 24 hour blood sugar, creatinine levels, and all ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) and doppler ultrasound reports will be recorded. Also, patients will be queried for resumption of tobacco products. These observations will be recorded on post-operative day 7, 31, and 93.

A comparison group of patients (N=20) who have undergone infra-inguinal bypass grafting will be obtained from retrospective chart review. Patients who have undergone regional or neuroaxial anesthesia for their bypass procedure will be excluded. As well, patients will be matched to their cohorts by age, sex, health comorbidities including: Congestive heart failure, smoking, diabetes, and renal dysfunction, and chronic anticoagulants or antiplatelet medication administration. The same primary and secondary outcome data obtained in the prospective portion of this study will be sought and recorded by chart review.

Conclusion Improved vascular surgical outcomes have been described in patients receiving regional anesthesia and neuroaxial anesthesia(2-4). Specifically, we anticipate a decrease in overall rates of death, wound infection, graft thrombosis, graft revision, and amputation in patients receiving regional anesthesia for infra-inguinal bypass grafting. As well, we hypothesize that patients receiving regional anesthestics will have improved secondary outcomes including decreased length of stay, narcotic consumption, nausea and vomiting, post-operative cognitive dysfunction, cardiac events, post-operative pain, and hyperglycemic episodes.

Study Type

Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68198-4455
        • University of Nebraska Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients 19 years of age and older who are candidates to undergo infrainguinal bypass grafting for the treatment of peripheral vascular disease.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients 19 years of age and older who are candidates to undergo infrainguinal bypass grafting for the treatment of peripheral vascular disease

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age is less than 19 years
  • allergies to amide anesthetics
  • inability to undergo general anesthesia
  • acute limb ischemia
  • any existence of contraindications to regional anesthesia in the presence of antiplatelet or anticoagulative drugs
  • evidence of gross neurological dysfunction of the lower extremity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Single shot femoral and sciatic nerve block
Prospective patient study group who present for infrainguinal bypass grafting and will receive single shot femoral and sub gluteal sciatic nerve blocks.
Ultrasound will be performed with a linear 10- to 13-Megahertz probe while performing the nerve block. Standard American Society of Anesthesiology monitors will be applied and the patient sedated at the discretion of the anesthetic team. Complications such as vascular puncture, pain on injection, or systemic toxicity will be recorded. A perineural dosing regimen for the regional blocks will be as follows: (femoral block) 20cc of 0.5% ropivicaine and (sub-gluteal posterior sciatic block) 20cc of 0.2% ropivicaine. Epinephrine will be withheld from the local anesthetic in order to prevent the potential of further ischemic complications.
Retrospective study group
Retrospective chart review will be performed and data collected on patients who have undergone infrainguinal bypass grafting under general anesthesia and without the use of regional or neuraxial anesthesia.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
graft thrombosis
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Following surgery, the patient will be monitored and data recorded daily while the patient is recovering in the hospital for thrombosis, the predominant mechanism of early graft failure. This continues post-discharge.
up to 3 months
limb amputation
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Following surgery, the patient will be monitored and data recorded daily while the patient is recovering in the hospital for the need for limb amputation. This continues post-discharge.
up to 3 months
wound infection
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Following surgery, the patient will be monitored and data recorded daily while the patient is recovering in the hospital for wound infection. This continues post-discharge.
up to 3 months
graft revision
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Following surgery, the patient will be monitored and data recorded daily while the patient is recovering in the hospital for the need for graft revision. This continues post-discharge.
up to 3 months
death rate
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Following surgery, the patient will be monitored and data recorded daily while the patient is recovering in the hospital for expiration. This continues post-discharge.
up to 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
decreased length of hospital stay
Time Frame: up to 1 month
decreased length of post surgical hospital stay
up to 1 month
narcotic consumption
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Overall narcotic consumption will be recorded
up to 3 months
nausea and vomiting
Time Frame: up to 1 month
Following surgery, the patient will be monitored and data recorded daily while the patient is recovering in the hospital for nausea and vomiting. This continues post-discharge.
up to 1 month
post-operative cognitive dysfunction
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Following surgery, the patient will be monitored and data recorded daily while the patient is recovering in the hospital for cognitive dysfunction. This continues post-discharge.
up to 3 months
major cardiac events
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Following surgery, the patient will be monitored and data recorded daily while the patient is recovering in the hospital for major cardiac events. This continues post-discharge.
up to 3 months
post-operative pain
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Following surgery, the patient will be monitored and data recorded daily while the patient is recovering in the hospital for post-operative pain. This continues post-discharge.
up to 3 months
hyperglycemic episodes
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Following surgery, the patient will be monitored and data recorded daily while the patient is recovering in the hospital for hyperglycemic episodes. This continues post-discharge.
up to 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas A Nicholas, MD, Univversity of Nebraska Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 10, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

September 10, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2013

First Posted (Estimated)

March 4, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peripheral Vascular Disease

Clinical Trials on Single shot femoral and sciatic nerve block

3
Subscribe