Improving Stroke Prevention Therapy for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in Primary Care

October 3, 2017 updated by: Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Improving Stroke Prevention Therapy for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in Primary Care: Protocol for a Pragmatic, Cluster-randomized Trial

The objective of this project is to increase the proportion of patients with AF that receive adequate stroke prevention therapy. Over half of patients with AF who suffer strokes are permanently disabled. Yet there remains a large portion of patients who do not receive appropriate stroke prevention therapy. The investigators hypothesize that a toolkit of quality improvement strategies in primary care could increase the proportion of patients with atrial fibrillation appropriately treated with stroke prevention therapy. The investigators' goal is to ensure the toolkit of interventions can be easily incorporated into day-to-day practice in primary care and can be readily and broadly disseminated if successful.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is growing as the population ages and 15% of all strokes are already attributed to AF. Unfortunately, half of patients with AF do not receive prescriptions for anticoagulation to prevent stroke due to a variety of system, provider, and patient-level barriers. The investigators will conduct a pragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled trial to test a 'toolkit' of quality improvement interventions in primary care. In keeping with the recommendations of the chronic care model to simultaneously facilitate proactive care by providers and activate patients, the toolkit includes provider- focused strategies (education, audit and feedback, electronic medical record-based tools including decision support and reminders) plus patient-directed strategies (educational letters and reminders). Thirty three primary care clinics will be randomized to the intervention or usual care. The trial will last 12 months and will be powered to show a difference of 10% in the primary outcome of proportion of patients receiving guideline-concordant care for stroke prevention. Analysis will be blind to allocation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
        • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Physicians are participants in the Electronic Medical Record Administrative-data Linked Database (EMRALD).
  • Patients are rostered to participating physicians, with a diagnosis in the chart of atrial fibrillation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Physicians who do not consent to data sharing
  • Patients who change physicians during the course of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Usual care
No standardized intervention for management of patients with atrial fibrillation. Instead participants receive interventions for management of chronic kidney disease.
Experimental: quality improvement toolkit
The toolkit includes provider-focused strategies (education, audit and feedback, electronic decision support and reminders) plus patient-directed strategies (educational letters and reminders).
educational and informatics-based interventions, including brief guideline summary, decision support and audit and feedback

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients with AF receiving guideline-concordant stroke prevention therapy
Time Frame: one year
Patients with risk factors for stroke (ie. CHADS2 >1 or age >65) who are prescribed anticoagulants and patients with no risk factors for stroke (ie. CHADS2 = 0 and age <65) who are not prescribed anticoagulants will be considered to be receiving guideline concordant therapy. (For patients with CHADS2 = 1 but aged < 65 the guideline recommendations are unclear, so these patients will not be considered in the primary analysis. For example, in patients with AF and hypertension at a younger age, anticoagulation or aspirin or no treatment would each be reasonable.)
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
proportion of patients taking warfarin in therapeutic range
Time Frame: one year
patients must have INR measured 8 times during the year and therapeutic range assessed using Rosendaal method
one year
proportion of patients taking a novel anticoagulant with appropriate dosing
Time Frame: one year
Dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban should be dose-adjusted in renal failure and avoided if estimated creatinine clearance is <30. Lower dose dabigatran is recommended for patients over 80.
one year
proportion receiving aspirin
Time Frame: one year
one year
proportion receiving clopidogrel
Time Frame: one year
one year
proportion achieving target blood pressure
Time Frame: one year
target defined as <130/80 for patients with diabetes, <150/80 for patients over 80, and <140/90 for all others
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Karen Tu, MD, ICES

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

August 22, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 5, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • G-13-0001873

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on quality improvement toolkit

Subscribe