Improving Quality of Care for Elderly Patients in the Educational Setting (MacyCoVE)

March 2, 2010 updated by: American Board of Internal Medicine

Improving Quality of Care for Elderly Patients in the Educational Setting: A Multicenter Exploratory Study of Quality Improvement

This is a multi-center exploratory study (each site got local IRB approval) of the impact of an educational toolkit combined with a practice-performance self-evaluation instrument (ABIM Care of the Vulnerable Elderly Practice Improvement Module) on trainee knowledge, skills, and attitudes about practice-based learning and improvement and systems-based practice in the care of elderly patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a longitudinal quasi-experimental study. Programs will be randomly assigned to either the comparison or intervention group, stratified based on program size, affiliation, geographic location, and presence of a geriatrics fellowship program.

Faculty will be trained in use of the CoVE PIM and in the development and implementation of a quality improvement plan. Residents in the intervention group will perform the medical record audit portion of the CoVE PIM. Patient surveys will be distributed by the residency clinics. The goal will be to audit the medical records of patients who complete the patient survey. Residents in intervention groups will participate in completing the practice system survey as a group. Finally, the residents in the intervention group will use the data from the medical record audit, patient survey, and practice system survey, working with faculty, to develop a quality improvement project to improve care for their geriatric patients.

Local medical record abstractors will be trained to perform a separate medical record audit of a random sample of the same patients identified by the residents for both the intervention and comparison groups. The abstractors will perform both a baseline and follow-up audit and will target the same patients who are still living from the baseline period. The follow-up audit will occur 12 months after completion of the initial PIM data collection phase, or approximately 18 months after the initiation of the study.

Evaluation of study outcomes will occur on the program, resident, and patient level.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All residents at a resident clinic site
  • Preceptors that are selected by the Champion for a particular resident clinic site
  • Patients age 65 years or older for whom any of the following measures would be appropriate: falls prevention, identifying urinary incontinence, screening for depression and cognitive impairment, and providing other preventive care.
  • Patients who have been in the practice for at least one year
  • Patients who are ambulatory
  • Patients who have been seen at least once by the practice within the past 12 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under age 65
  • Patients who have a terminal illness
  • Patients with a life expectancy of less than one-year

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 1
Control. Forty-two residency programs randomly assigned and stratified according to size, affiliation, geographic location, and presence of geriatrics fellowship. Twenty-one in the control arm. This group will use PIM as a data collection tool during baseline and follow-up time (i.e. audit of 50-75 charts, survey from 50-75 patients, and one system survey). They will not see the summary results of the data collected; they will not be required to complete a quality improvement plan based on the summary data. Local researchers will collect the data. Individual trainees will not do data collection or audits. At both baseline and follow-up, trainees will complete pre and post test surveys of 1) geriatric and 2) quality improvement knowledge, skills, and attitudes.
A resource toolkit about geriatrics and quality improvement was given to both study arms.
Other Names:
  • The Improvement Guide by Langley and Nolan
  • Geriatrics at Your Fingertips
  • ACOVE Physician Education Program DVD
  • Online resources
  • Membership to AGS teaching slides website
OTHER: 2
There are 21 residency programs in intervention arm who will 1) use PIM as a data collection tool (local researchers will audit 50-75 charts, survey 50-75 patients, and complete one system survey); 2) Each trainee will audit of up to five patient charts; collect 5 patient surveys; and complete the system survey as a group; 3) Summary data from these data streams will be reviewed by group; then they will design and implement a quality improvement plan; 4) At follow-up, local researchers will re-audit same 50-75 charts, collect surveys from same 50-75 patients, and complete one system survey. At baseline and follow-up, trainees and faculty will complete surveys of geriatric and quality improvement knowledge, skills, and attitudes.
A resource toolkit about geriatrics and quality improvement was given to both study arms.
Other Names:
  • The Improvement Guide by Langley and Nolan
  • Geriatrics at Your Fingertips
  • ACOVE Physician Education Program DVD
  • Online resources
  • Membership to AGS teaching slides website
The ABIM CoVE PIM is a practice-performance self-evaluation instrument. It is a web-based tool based on nationally recognized guidelines that uses chart abstraction, patient surveys, and a practice system survey in order to generate a performance report focused on a key aspects of care for vulnerable elderly.
Other Names:
  • Quality improvement module
  • Practice improvemnet module
  • Self-assesment in pratice based learning and improvement
  • PIM in residency

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Practice Improvement Module (PIM) quality impact
Time Frame: 2 years
Assess the impact of the Care of the Vulnerable Elderly (CoVE) Practice Improvement Module to improve the quality of care received by elderly patients in the residency ambulatory setting.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 years
Assess resident and faculty satisfaction with the Care of the Vulnerable Elderly Practice Improvement Module.
2 years
Assess feasibility
Time Frame: 2 years
Assess the feasibility of conducting surveys of elderly patients in the residency training setting.
2 years
Assess use of geriatric and quality improvement toolkit
Time Frame: 2 years
Assess the use and impact of an educational toolkit for teaching geriatric quality of care. The analysis will specifically focus on what components of the toolkit are used by programs.
2 years
Assess effects of disparities on elder care
Time Frame: 2 years
Assess the effects of health disparities on the care of elderly patients in a training setting.
2 years
Assess barriers in training setting
Time Frame: 2 years
Assess structural barriers to providing quality care for vulnerable elderly in diverse training settings
2 years
Practice Improvement Module impact for knowledge, skills, and attitudes
Time Frame: 2 years
Assess the impact of the Care of the Vulnerable Elderly Practice Improvement Module to improve the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of residents in the care of specific geriatric conditions.
2 years
Practice Improvement Module impact vs traditional
Time Frame: 2 years
Assess the impact of the Care of the Vulnerable Elderly Practice Improvement Module compared to a traditional educational intervention on residents' knowledge of and attitudes about practice-based learning and improvement, systems based practice, and geriatric care guidelines.
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eric S Holmboe, MD, American Board of Internal Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2006

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2007

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 4, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 4, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2010

Last Verified

March 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CPS 485

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Elderly

Clinical Trials on Geriatric and Quality Improvement toolkit

Subscribe