Effect of Butorphanol Combined With Flurbiprofen Axetil on Preventing Hyperalgesia Induced by Remifentanil in Patients

December 8, 2015 updated by: Guolin Wang, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital

Effect of Butorphanol Combined With Flurbiprofen Axetil on Preventing Postoperative Hyperalgesia Induced by Remifentanil in Patients Undergoing Lower Abdomimal Surgery

Purpose:

To explore and compare antihyperalgesic effects of butorphanol, flurbiprofen axetil, and a combination of both received before anesthesia induction.

To evaluate and examine the incidence of adverse effects with the purpose of selecting the optimum dose.

.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There are a dramatically increasing number of evidences that administration of the potent, ultra-short-acting opioid remifentanil seems to cause opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) more frequently and predictably compared with the others, likely due to its rapid onset and offset. Therefore, prophylaxis of remifentanil induced hyperalgesia is indispensable to postoperative comfort and satisfaction.

There is no denying the fact that OIH is related to central glutaminergic system and N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor-activation induced central sensitization. Prostaglandins can promote glutamate release from both astrocytes and spinal cord dorsal horns with subsequent activation of the NMDA receptors, and flurbiprofen axetil, as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), not only functionally antagonizes the NMDA receptor activation via inhibition of prostaglandins, but also is a targeted drug which gathers at the site of inflammation, thus greatly enhances the analgesic effect. While butorphanol has both spinal analgesic and sedative functions because of predominantly central κ-receptor agonist activation, other advantages of butorphanol include few side effects, very low addiction potential, and low toxicity on account of a partial agonist-antagonist activity to μ-receptor. Moreover, antihyperalgesic activity of κ opioids at the site of inflammation has been reported in various acute pain models. The following study is carried out to evaluate whether butorphanol combined with flurbiprofen axetil can be safely and effectively applied to preventing postoperative hyperalgesia induced by remifentanil in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

180

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tianjin
      • Tianjin, Tianjin, China, 300052
        • Tianjin Medical University General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is scheduled to undergo lower abdominal surgery under a short general anesthesia of less than 2 hours
  2. Subject's American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status is I-II.
  3. The subject's parent/legally authorized guardian has given written informed consent to participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has a diagnosis of renal or liver failure.
  2. Subject has a diagnosis of Insulin dependent diabetes.
  3. Subject is allergy and contraindication to butorphanol or NSAIDs.
  4. Subject has a history of chronic pain, a history of alcohol or opioid abuse, pre-existing therapy with opioids, intake of any analgesic drug within 48 hours before surgery.
  5. Subject has any contraindication for the use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).
  6. Subject is pregnant or breast-feeding.
  7. Subject is obese (body mass index >30kg/m^2).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Normal Saline
Normal saline is intravenously administrated before anesthesia induction and intraoperative pain management was with remifentanil
Normal Saline is intravenously administrated before anesthesia induction
Remifentanil is intravenously administrated
Active Comparator: Butorphanol
Butorphanol is intravenously administrated at a dose of 20μg/ kg before anesthesia induction and intraoperative pain management was with remifentanil
Remifentanil is intravenously administrated
Butorphanol is intravenously administrated
Active Comparator: Flurbiprofen axetilⅠ
Flurbiprofen axetil is intravenously administrated at a dose of 1.0mg/ kg before anesthesia induction and intraoperative pain management was with remifentanil
Remifentanil is intravenously administrated
Flurbiprofen axetil is intravenously administrated
Active Comparator: Flurbiprofen axetilⅡ
Flurbiprofen axetil is intravenously administrated at a dose of 1.0mg/ kg before the skin closure and intraoperative pain management was with remifentanil
Remifentanil is intravenously administrated
Flurbiprofen axetil is intravenously administrated
Active Comparator: Butorphanol-Flurbiprofen axetil
A dose of 10μg/ kg butorphanol and a dose of 0.5mg/ kg flurbiprofen axetil are intravenously administrated before anesthesia induction and intraoperative pain management was with remifentanil
Remifentanil is intravenously administrated
Butorphanol is intravenously administrated
Flurbiprofen axetil is intravenously administrated
Sham Comparator: Sufentanil
Normal saline is intravenously administrated before anesthesia induction and intraoperative pain management was with sufentanil
Normal Saline is intravenously administrated before anesthesia induction
Sufentanil is intravenously administrated

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mechanical Hyperalgesia Threshold on the Dominant Inner Forearm
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
The mechanical hyperalgesia threshold was defined as the lowest force (g) necessary to bend a Von Frey filament, which was perceived to be painful by the patient and measured by Von Frey filament at 24 hours postoperatively
24 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Dose of First Postoperative Analgesic Requirement
Time Frame: 1 hour after surgery
First postoperative pain (NRS≥5) is initially controlled by titration of sufentanyl.
1 hour after surgery
Pain Score (NRS)
Time Frame: 3h, 6h, 12h, and 24h after surgery
The pain score at rest was evaluated by pain 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS): 0 = no pain, 10 = greatest imaginable pain.
3h, 6h, 12h, and 24h after surgery
Time of First Postoperative Analgesic Requirement
Time Frame: 1 hour post surgery
First postoperative pain (NRS≥5) is initially controlled by titration of sufentanyl.
1 hour post surgery
Occurrence of Side Effects
Time Frame: 24 hours
Occurrence of side effects: nausea, vomiting, dizziness, headache, shivering, pruritus
24 hours
Cumulative Sufentanyl Consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours
Each patient was administered analgesics using a PCA pump containing sufentanil (100μg) in normal saline at a total volume of 100 ml after leaving PACU. This device was set to deliver a basal infusion of 2 ml/h and bolus doses of 0.5 ml with a 15-min lockout period. Sufentanyl cumulative consumption is recorded 24 hours postoperatively
24 hours
Normalized Area of Hyperalgesia Around the Incision
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
The skin around the incision is stimulated in steps of 5 mm at intervals of 1 s starting outside of the hyperalgesic area in the direction of the incision. The distance from the incision to the first point where a 'painful', 'sore' or 'sharper' feeling occurred is measured and noted. This measurement is repeated at predefined radial lines around the incision. To eliminate the variable length of incision, this length is subtracted from the longer diameter leaving four radial distances from the end and from the middle of the incision. The normalized area of hyperalgesia is calculated by summing up the areas of the remaining four triangles measured by and Von Frey filament.
24 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

January 23, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 8, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Normal Saline

3
Subscribe