Virtual Reality: a Teaching-learning Strategy for Cognitive Mastery in Airway Trauma Management (AW&VR)

October 24, 2023 updated by: Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Virtual Reality: a Teaching-learning Strategy for Cognitive Mastery in Airway Trauma

Airway injury in patients is a high risk and complex medical crisis. Unfortunately, training for airway management in injured patients is challenging. The most effective way of practicing airway management is using mannequins. However, mannequin training is expensive and only occasionally available to medical trainees.

The purpose of this study is to determine if Virtual Reality (VR) can be used to educate medical students on airway injury management. VR training will involve managing the care of a patient with an airway injury in an immersive, interactive VR hospital trauma bay. The investigators will compare the knowledge gained from VR training vs. mannequin training. The investigators will also investigate whether VR training teaches students faster than mannequin training. In addition, the investigators will identify factors which might affect learning from VR.

Medical students who choose to participate will be randomized (i.e. participant will have a 50% chance to be placed in either group) to be trained with VR or a mannequin. Participants then will be trained on airway injury management using their assigned training approach. One week later, all participants will be assessed on their airway injury management skills using a mannequin. Before and after their sessions, participants will also be asked to complete a questionnaire on their clinical decision-making. Participants who received VR training will also complete a questionnaire about their experience with the VR training.

This study will help develop a new approach to airway management training which is cheaper and more easily available to medical trainees than mannequin training. This educational tool could lead to better treatment of airway trauma in future patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
        • Recruiting
        • Sunnybrook Health Sciences
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Fahad Alam, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 at time of consent
  • Medical student at U of T in 1st, 2nd or 3rd year
  • Able to attend two sessions a week apart

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of participant consent or capacity to give consent
  • History of significant motion sickness (during exposure to physical, visual and virtual motion, cybersickness verbally declared by patient)
  • Visual/hearing impairments that affect abilities to listen/watch videos/VR video

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: VR-based Simulation (Intervention)
Students will receive training on traumatic airway management using VR-based simulation.
Participants will experience a novel interactive and immersive VR full size trauma bay with an adult patient and healthcare professionals. Immersed in the environment, learners undertake the decision-making steps in managing the medical care for a patient with an airway injury. Learners are first given the case scenario from which they form their own learning goals/plans. They then navigate through the scenario that will provide feedback depending on their actions in the form of either the patient's hemodynamic changes or prompts from healthcare avatars in the scenario. These feedback processes are built-in and designed to promote reflection and reorganization of the learner's decision-making strategies. As learning progresses, fewer prompts will be given. At the end of the scenario, evaluation algorithms pre-programmed into the VR-based simulation will be displayed.
Other: Mannequin-based Simulation (Control)
Students will receive training on traumatic airway management using mannequin-based simulation.
Participants will experience a mannequin-based scenario practice which is the current gold standard in medical education. The trauma airway management scenario will match the VR environment and sequence of events.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Traumatic Airway Injury Management Knowledge
Time Frame: up to 24 hours before and up to 24 hours after practice sessions
Knowledge acquisition of traumatic airway injury management as assessed by the written Key Features Decision Making Checklist, Change from baseline (pre-training) knowledge to after practice session knowledge (post-training).
up to 24 hours before and up to 24 hours after practice sessions
Application of Traumatic Airway Injury Management Knowledge
Time Frame: 7 days after practice session
Application of decision making concepts surrounding traumatic airway injury management as assessed by the Airway Injury Checklist of Core Decision Making Steps completed during participant performance of a simulated crisis assessment scenario.
7 days after practice session

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Required Practice Sessions
Time Frame: During the 1 day practice session
Identify whether VR or mannequin-based simulation practice require fewer practice sessions to achieve learning objectives.
During the 1 day practice session

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 108-2019

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Airway Management

Clinical Trials on VR-based simulation

3
Subscribe