Dexamethasone Versus Ketorolac Injection for the Treatment of Local Inflammatory Hand and Upper Extremity Disorders

October 8, 2020 updated by: NYU Langone Health

A Double-blinded, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Dexamethasone Versus Ketorolac Injection for the Treatment of Local Inflammatory Hand and Upper Extremity Disorders

The primary objective of this study is to compare local corticosteroid hand and elbow injections to placebo or ketorolac to determine if there is an equal or better reduction of symptoms for common orthopaedic upper extremity disorders including: De Quervain's tenosynovitis, trigger fingers, and tennis elbow (lateral epicondylitis). The investigators will enroll 780 subjects, divided equally into three arms for each disease process, and compare the efficacy of Ketorolac injections to Dexamethasone injections by measuring patient's functional status scores and pain scores at 0 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 month followup periods, prospectively over time.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to compare local corticosteroid hand and elbow injections to placebo or ketorolac to determine if there is an equal or better reduction of symptoms for common orthopaedic upper extremity disorders including: De Quervain's tenosynovitis, trigger fingers, and tennis elbow (lateral epicondylitis).

Number of Subjects: 780 total subjects:

• 260 subjects in each of the 3 treatment groups (De Quervain's tenosynovitis, trigger fingers and lateral epicondylitis) Diagnosis and Main Inclusion Criteria Subjects 18 years or older, with any of the following diagnoses: De Quervain's tenosynovitis, trigger fingers, or lateral epicondylitis

Study Product, Dose, Route, Regimen: Peritendinous soft tissue injection for De Quervain's tenosynovitis, trigger fingers and lateral epicondylitis:

• 1 mL of ketorolac (30mg/mL) and 0.5 mL (5mg) of 1% lidocaine Duration of administration Single administration, with a second injection permitted only once as subject desires due to no major clinical response at the 4 or 8-week follow-up.

Reference therapy: Standard of care peritendinous soft tissue injection for De Quervain's tenosynovitis, trigger fingers, and lateral epicondylitis:

• 1 mL of dexamethasone sodium phosphate (4mg/mL) and 0.5 mL (5mg) of 1% lidocaine

Statistical Methodology: The sample size as stated above was derived by a power analysis. A power analysis indicated that a total sample size of 200 patients randomized equally (1:1 randomization) to each treatment arm (i.e trigger finger, De Quervain's disease, and tennis elbow) without any blocking or stratification would provide 80% statistical power (alpha=.05, beta=0.20) to detect a 10% difference in mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (quickDASH) scores between cohorts assuming a common standard deviation of 25% (effect size = 10/25 = 0.4). To account for an estimated 30% loss to follow-up, the investigators plan to enroll a total of 260 patients per treatment arm (i.e. trigger finger, De Quervain's disease, and tennis elbow). In total, there will be approximately 780 patients enrolled among all treatment arms.

1.1 Background Many orthopaedic hand disorders are comprised of different forms of tendonitis, tenosynovitis, and arthritis. The inflammatory processes of these disorders cause discomfort and functional impairment for patients. Decreasing the inflammatory response by use of splinting, physiotherapy, systemic anti-inflammatory agents, and local anti-inflammatory injections helps to alleviate some or all of the discomfort (2-4). Steroid injections are not entirely benign, and complications include tendon ruptures, subcutaneous fat atrophy, skin pigmentation changes, cartilage damage, and hyperglycemic responses in diabetics (9-11, 22-23). Studies have shown that ketorolac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent has a potent anti-inflammatory effect comparable to corticosteroids and a strong analgesic effect allowing for reduced opioid consumption postoperatively (7, 8). One could argue that the potent anti-inflammatory properties of ketorolac could be used to substitute for local corticosteroid injections in treating certain hand disorders. Given the side-effect profile for corticosteroids it may be beneficial to treat inflammatory disorders with local ketorolac injections. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents also have their known systemic adverse effects including gastric ulceration and intestinal bleeding as well as impairment of renal function. Most of these side effects are theoretically avoided with local tissue injections.

1.2 Study Drugs

Ketorolac:

The proposed use of ketorolac in this study is outside of the FDA-approved indication and is the investigational agent in this study

Ketorolac is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). The approved indication for Ketorolac is for the short-term (≤5 days) management of moderately severe, acute pain that requires analgesia at the opioid level, usually in a postoperative setting. It is highly protein bound (99%) and is largely metabolized by the liver. In it's approved indication it is contraindicated for those with renal impairment, active peptic ulcer disease, pregnant or nursing females, individuals with NSAID hypersensitivity, or individuals at high risk for bleeding/clotting disorders.

Dexamethasone:

Dexamethasone is a synthetic corticosteroid and possesses glucocorticoid activity, and will be used within its labeled indication for this study: intra-articular or soft tissue injection for: synovitis of osteoarthritis, epicondylitis, acute nonspecific tenosynovitis. It is the active comparator in this study.

In its approved indication there use limitations for immunocompromised individuals, pregnant females, persons with allergy to steroids, individuals with systemic fungal infections, and individuals with cerebral malaria. It is contra-indicated in systemic fungal infections, and hypersensitivity to any component of this product, including sulfites.

Lidocaine:

Lidocaine is a local anesthetic of the amide type, and will be used within its labeled indication for this study: production of local or regional anesthesia by infiltration techniques such as percutaneous injection. It is to be given as concomitant therapy with both the investigational agent, ketorolac injection, and the standard of care therapy, dexamethasone injection.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

245

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • New York University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must be diagnosed with at least one of the following: trigger finger, de quervain's tenosynovitis, or tennis elbow (lateral epicondylitis)
  • Patients age 18 years of age or older from all racial/ethnic types
  • Patient who are both males and females
  • Study participants will include any New York University employee or students as these individuals also can get hand and upper extremity pathology. It will be specifically reiterated to them that their academic status or grades, or employment will not be affected by their decision to participate in this study. Record of the participation cannot be linked to an academic record.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients had previous steroid injection at the site in question within 90 days of enrollment
  • Patients with a history of gastric ulcers, renal impairment, allergy/hypersensitivity to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) or lidocaine derivative medications, immunocompromised patients (HIV/AIDs) and pregnant females

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Arm Receiving Dexamethasone Injection

Dexamethasone will be administered as a peritendinous soft tissue injection of 1 mL of dexamethasone sodium phosphate (4mg/mL) and 0.5 mL (5mg) of 1% lidocaine.

Dexamethasone will be administered as a peritendinous soft tissue injection of 1 mL of dexamethasone sodium phosphate (4mg/mL) and 0.5 mL (5mg) of 1% lidocaine

Patients will be followed at the initial office visit, 4-weeks, 8-weeks, 12-weeks, and 6 months post injection to determine clinical response. A second injection can be given only once if the patient desires due to no clinical response at the 4 or 8-week follow-up.

Dexamethasone is a synthetic corticosteroid and possesses glucocorticoid activity, and will be used within its labeled indication for this study: intra-articular or soft tissue injection for: synovitis of osteoarthritis, epicondylitis, acute nonspecific tenosynovitis. It is the active comparator in this study.

In its approved indication there use limitations for immunocompromised individuals, pregnant females, persons with allergy to steroids, individuals with systemic fungal infections, and individuals with cerebral malaria. It is contra-indicated in systemic fungal infections, and hypersensitivity to any component of this product, including sulfites.

Experimental: Arm Receiving Ketorolac Injection

Ketorolac will be administered as a peritendinous soft tissue injection of 1 mL of ketorolac (30mg/mL) and 0.5 mL (5mg) of 1% lidocaine.

Patients will be followed at the initial office visit, 4-weeks, 8-weeks, 12-weeks, and 6 months post injection to determine clinical response. A second injection can be given only once if the patient desires due to no clinical response at the 4 or 8-week follow-up.

The proposed use of ketorolac in this study is outside of the FDA-approved indication and is the investigational agent in this study

Ketorolac is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). The approved indication for Ketorolac is for the short-term (≤5 days) management of moderately severe, acute pain that requires analgesia at the opioid level, usually in a postoperative setting. It is highly protein bound (99%) and is largely metabolized by the liver. In it's approved indication it is contraindicated for those with renal impairment, active peptic ulcer disease, pregnant or nursing females, individuals with NSAID hypersensitivity, or individuals at high risk for bleeding/clotting disorders.

Other Names:
  • Toradol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EQVAS Score
Time Frame: Baseline
The EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) is a vertical visual analogue scale that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health.
Baseline
Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EQVAS Score
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) is a vertical visual analogue scale that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health.
4 weeks
Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EQVAS Score
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) is a vertical visual analogue scale that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health.
8 weeks
Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EQVAS Score
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) is a vertical visual analogue scale that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health.
12 weeks
Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EQVAS Score
Time Frame: 6 months
The EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) is a vertical visual analogue scale that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health.
6 months
Trigger Finger Treatment Group: QuickDASH Functional Scores
Time Frame: Baseline
The QuickDASH (Quick - Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) is an 11-question standardized survey used to assess a patient's overall functional status and is widely used in the practice of orthopaedic surgery as an analog measurement of a patient's functional ability. Scores range from 0-100, with 100 being the most poor functionality and 0 being the best. This will be assessed at every visit by having the patient fill out the survey and our team calculating the score at the end of the visit.
Baseline
Trigger Finger Treatment Group: QuickDASH Functional Scores
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The QuickDASH (Quick - Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) is an 11-question standardized survey used to assess a patient's overall functional status and is widely used in the practice of orthopaedic surgery as an analog measurement of a patient's functional ability. Scores range from 0-100, with 100 being the most poor functionality and 0 being the best. This will be assessed at every visit by having the patient fill out the survey and our team calculating the score at the end of the visit.
4 weeks
Trigger Finger Treatment Group: QuickDASH Functional Scores
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The QuickDASH (Quick - Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) is an 11-question standardized survey used to assess a patient's overall functional status and is widely used in the practice of orthopaedic surgery as an analog measurement of a patient's functional ability. Scores range from 0-100, with 100 being the most poor functionality and 0 being the best. This will be assessed at every visit by having the patient fill out the survey and our team calculating the score at the end of the visit.
8 weeks
Trigger Finger Treatment Group: QuickDASH Functional Scores
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The QuickDASH (Quick - Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) is an 11-question standardized survey used to assess a patient's overall functional status and is widely used in the practice of orthopaedic surgery as an analog measurement of a patient's functional ability. Scores range from 0-100, with 100 being the most poor functionality and 0 being the best. This will be assessed at every visit by having the patient fill out the survey and our team calculating the score at the end of the visit.
12 weeks
Trigger Finger Treatment Group: QuickDASH Functional Scores
Time Frame: 6 months
The QuickDASH (Quick - Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) is an 11-question standardized survey used to assess a patient's overall functional status and is widely used in the practice of orthopaedic surgery as an analog measurement of a patient's functional ability. Scores range from 0-100, with 100 being the most poor functionality and 0 being the best. This will be assessed at every visit by having the patient fill out the survey and our team calculating the score at the end of the visit.
6 months
Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D) Functional Score
Time Frame: Baseline
The EQ-5D (EuroQol five-dimension scale) is a 5 question survey with 3 potential responses per question, based on measuring a patient's overall quality of life. The responses are compiled into a numerical score ranging from 1 to -0.11, with 1 being the best and -0.11 being the worst in terms of quality of life. This survey will be administered to patients at each visit, along with the other surveys.
Baseline
Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D) Functional Score
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The EQ-5D (EuroQol five-dimension scale) is a 5 question survey with 3 potential responses per question, based on measuring a patient's overall quality of life. The responses are compiled into a numerical score ranging from 1 to -0.11, with 1 being the best and -0.11 being the worst in terms of quality of life. This survey will be administered to patients at each visit, along with the other surveys.
4 weeks
Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D) Functional Score
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The EQ-5D (EuroQol five-dimension scale) is a 5 question survey with 3 potential responses per question, based on measuring a patient's overall quality of life. The responses are compiled into a numerical score ranging from 1 to -0.11, with 1 being the best and -0.11 being the worst in terms of quality of life. This survey will be administered to patients at each visit, along with the other surveys.
8 weeks
Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D) Functional Score
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The EQ-5D (EuroQol five-dimension scale) is a 5 question survey with 3 potential responses per question, based on measuring a patient's overall quality of life. The responses are compiled into a numerical score ranging from 1 to -0.11, with 1 being the best and -0.11 being the worst in terms of quality of life. This survey will be administered to patients at each visit, along with the other surveys.
12 weeks
Trigger Finger Treatment Group: EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D) Functional Score
Time Frame: 6 months
The EQ-5D (EuroQol five-dimension scale) is a 5 question survey with 3 potential responses per question, based on measuring a patient's overall quality of life. The responses are compiled into a numerical score ranging from 1 to -0.11, with 1 being the best and -0.11 being the worst in terms of quality of life. This survey will be administered to patients at each visit, along with the other surveys.
6 months
Trigger Finger Treatment Group: VAS Pain Scores
Time Frame: Baseline
VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain score is a 0-10 numerical score assessing patient's subjective level of reported pain. The higher the score, the higher the pain level. This will be recorded from the patient's written response at every visit.
Baseline
Trigger Finger Treatment Group: VAS Pain Scores
Time Frame: 4 weeks
VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain score is a 0-10 numerical score assessing patient's subjective level of reported pain. The higher the score, the higher the pain level. This will be recorded from the patient's written response at every visit.
4 weeks
Trigger Finger Treatment Group: VAS Pain Scores
Time Frame: 8 weeks
VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain score is a 0-10 numerical score assessing patient's subjective level of reported pain. The higher the score, the higher the pain level. This will be recorded from the patient's written response at every visit.
8 weeks
Trigger Finger Treatment Group: VAS Pain Scores
Time Frame: 12 weeks
VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain score is a 0-10 numerical score assessing patient's subjective level of reported pain. The higher the score, the higher the pain level. This will be recorded from the patient's written response at every visit.
12 weeks
Trigger Finger Treatment Group: VAS Pain Scores
Time Frame: 6 months
VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain score is a 0-10 numerical score assessing patient's subjective level of reported pain. The higher the score, the higher the pain level. This will be recorded from the patient's written response at every visit.
6 months
Trigger Finger Treatment Group: Quinnell Grading Scores
Time Frame: Baseline
The Quinnell grading system monitors for trigger symptom improvement with a range of 0 (minumum) to 4 (maximum) with a higher number corresponding to worse symptoms: 0-normal movement of finger; 1-uneven movement; 2-active correctible locking of digit; 3-passively correctible locking; 4-fixed deformity.
Baseline
Trigger Finger Treatment Group: Quinnell Grading Scores
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The Quinnell grading system monitors for trigger symptom improvement with a range of 0 (minumum) to 4 (maximum) with a higher number corresponding to worse symptoms: 0-normal movement of finger; 1-uneven movement; 2-active correctible locking of digit; 3-passively correctible locking; 4-fixed deformity.
4 weeks
Trigger Finger Treatment Group: Quinnell Grading Scores
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The Quinnell grading system monitors for trigger symptom improvement with a range of 0 (minumum) to 4 (maximum) with a higher number corresponding to worse symptoms: 0-normal movement of finger; 1-uneven movement; 2-active correctible locking of digit; 3-passively correctible locking; 4-fixed deformity.
8 weeks
Trigger Finger Treatment Group: Quinnell Grading Scores
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The Quinnell grading system monitors for trigger symptom improvement with a range of 0 (minumum) to 4 (maximum) with a higher number corresponding to worse symptoms: 0-normal movement of finger; 1-uneven movement; 2-active correctible locking of digit; 3-passively correctible locking; 4-fixed deformity.
12 weeks
Trigger Finger Treatment Group: Quinnell Grading Scores
Time Frame: 6 months
The Quinnell grading system monitors for trigger symptom improvement with a range of 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum) with a higher number corresponding to worse symptoms: 0-normal movement of finger; 1-uneven movement; 2-active correctible locking of digit; 3-passively correctible locking; 4-fixed deformity.
6 months
DeQuervain's Treatment Group: EQ-VAS Score
Time Frame: Baseline
The EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) is a vertical visual analogue scale that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health.
Baseline
DeQuervain's Treatment Group: EQ-VAS Score
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) is a vertical visual analogue scale that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health.
4 weeks
DeQuervain's Treatment Group: EQ-VAS Score
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) is a vertical visual analogue scale that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health.
8 weeks
De Quervain's Treatment Group: QuickDASH Scores
Time Frame: Baseline
The QuickDASH (Quick - Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) is an 11-question standardized survey used to assess a patient's overall functional status and is widely used in the practice of orthopaedic surgery as an analog measurement of a patient's functional ability. Scores range from 0-100, with 100 being the most poor functionality and 0 being the best. This will be assessed at every visit by having the patient fill out the survey and our team calculating the score at the end of the visit.
Baseline
De Quervain's Treatment Group: QuickDASH Scores
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The QuickDASH (Quick - Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) is an 11-question standardized survey used to assess a patient's overall functional status and is widely used in the practice of orthopaedic surgery as an analog measurement of a patient's functional ability. Scores range from 0-100, with 100 being the most poor functionality and 0 being the best. This will be assessed at every visit by having the patient fill out the survey and our team calculating the score at the end of the visit.
4 weeks
De Quervain's Treatment Group: QuickDASH Scores
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The QuickDASH (Quick - Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) is an 11-question standardized survey used to assess a patient's overall functional status and is widely used in the practice of orthopaedic surgery as an analog measurement of a patient's functional ability. Scores range from 0-100, with 100 being the most poor functionality and 0 being the best. This will be assessed at every visit by having the patient fill out the survey and our team calculating the score at the end of the visit.
8 weeks
DeQuervain's Treatment Group: EQ-5D Score
Time Frame: Baseline
The EQ-5D (EuroQol five-dimension scale) is a 5 question survey with 3 potential responses per question, based on measuring a patient's overall quality of life. The responses are compiled into a numerical score ranging from 1 to -0.11, with 1 being the best and -0.11 being the worst in terms of quality of life. This survey will be administered to patients at each visit, along with the other surveys.
Baseline
DeQuervain's Treatment Group: EQ-5D Score
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The EQ-5D (EuroQol five-dimension scale) is a 5 question survey with 3 potential responses per question, based on measuring a patient's overall quality of life. The responses are compiled into a numerical score ranging from 1 to -0.11, with 1 being the best and -0.11 being the worst in terms of quality of life. This survey will be administered to patients at each visit, along with the other surveys.
4 weeks
DeQuervain's Treatment Group: EQ-5D Score
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The EQ-5D (EuroQol five-dimension scale) is a 5 question survey with 3 potential responses per question, based on measuring a patient's overall quality of life. The responses are compiled into a numerical score ranging from 1 to -0.11, with 1 being the best and -0.11 being the worst in terms of quality of life. This survey will be administered to patients at each visit, along with the other surveys.
8 weeks
De Quervain's Treatment Group: VAS Pain Score
Time Frame: Baseline
VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain score is a 0-10 numerical score assessing patient's subjective level of reported pain. The higher the score, the higher and worse the pain level. This will be recorded from the patient's written response at every visit.
Baseline
De Quervain's Treatment Group: VAS Pain Score
Time Frame: 4 weeks
VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain score is a 0-10 numerical score assessing patient's subjective level of reported pain. The higher the score, the higher and worse the pain level. This will be recorded from the patient's written response at every visit.
4 weeks
De Quervain's Treatment Group: VAS Pain Score
Time Frame: 8 weeks
VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain score is a 0-10 numerical score assessing patient's subjective level of reported pain. The higher the score, the higher and worse the pain level. This will be recorded from the patient's written response at every visit.
8 weeks
Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: Participants With Pain (Positive Test) Over Lateral Epicondyle
Time Frame: Baseline
Clinician will examine the patient and palpate over the lateral epicondyle. Presence of pain is a positive test, recorded as 1. Absence of pain is a negative test, recorded as 0. This is done at every visit.
Baseline
Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: Participants With Pain (Positive Test) in Lateral Epicondyle
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Clinician will examine the patient and palpate over the lateral epicondyle. Presence of pain is a positive test, recorded as 1. Absence of pain is a negative test, recorded as 0. This is done at every visit.
4 weeks
Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: Participants With Pain (Positive Test) Over Lateral Epicondyle
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Clinician will examine the patient and palpate over the lateral epicondyle. Presence of pain is a positive test, recorded as 1. Absence of pain is a negative test, recorded as 0. This is done at every visit.
8 weeks
Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: Participants With Pain (Positive Test) With Resisted Wrist Extension
Time Frame: Baseline
The clinician examines the patient and asks patient to extend wrist against resistance by the clinician. Production of pain is a positive test, recorded as 1. Absence of pain is a negative test, recorded as 0. This is done at every visit.
Baseline
Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: Participants With Pain (Positive Test) With Resisted Wrist Extension
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The clinician examines the patient and asks patient to extend wrist against resistance by the clinician. Production of pain is a positive test, recorded as 1. Absence of pain is a negative test, recorded as 0. This is done at every visit.
4 weeks
Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: Participants With Pain (Positive Test) With Resisted Wrist Extension
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The clinician examines the patient and asks patient to extend wrist against resistance by the clinician. Production of pain is a positive test, recorded as 1. Absence of pain is a negative test, recorded as 0. This is done at every visit.
8 weeks
Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: QuickDASH Functional Scores
Time Frame: Baseline
The QuickDASH (Quick - Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) is an 11-question standardized survey used to assess a patient's overall functional status and is widely used in the practice of orthopaedic surgery as an analog measurement of a patient's functional ability. Scores range from 0-100, with 100 being the most poor functionality and 0 being the best. This will be assessed at every visit by having the patient fill out the survey and our team calculating the score at the end of the visit.
Baseline
Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: QuickDASH Functional Scores
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The QuickDASH (Quick - Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) is an 11-question standardized survey used to assess a patient's overall functional status and is widely used in the practice of orthopaedic surgery as an analog measurement of a patient's functional ability. Scores range from 0-100, with 100 being the most poor functionality and 0 being the best. This will be assessed at every visit by having the patient fill out the survey and our team calculating the score at the end of the visit.
4 weeks
Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: QuickDASH Functional Scores
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The QuickDASH (Quick - Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) is an 11-question standardized survey used to assess a patient's overall functional status and is widely used in the practice of orthopaedic surgery as an analog measurement of a patient's functional ability. Scores range from 0-100, with 100 being the most poor functionality and 0 being the best. This will be assessed at every visit by having the patient fill out the survey and our team calculating the score at the end of the visit.
8 weeks
Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: EQ-5D Scores
Time Frame: Baseline
The EQ-5D (EuroQol five-dimension scale) is a 5 question survey with 3 potential responses per question, based on measuring a patient's overall quality of life. The responses are compiled into a numerical score ranging from 1 to -0.11, with 1 being the best and -0.11 being the worst in terms of quality of life. This survey will be administered to patients at each visit, along with the other surveys.
Baseline
Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: EQ-5D Scores
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The EQ-5D (EuroQol five-dimension scale) is a 5 question survey with 3 potential responses per question, based on measuring a patient's overall quality of life. The responses are compiled into a numerical score ranging from 1 to -0.11, with 1 being the best and -0.11 being the worst in terms of quality of life. This survey will be administered to patients at each visit, along with the other surveys.
4 weeks
Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: EQ-5D Scores
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The EQ-5D (EuroQol five-dimension scale) is a 5 question survey with 3 potential responses per question, based on measuring a patient's overall quality of life. The responses are compiled into a numerical score ranging from 1 to -0.11, with 1 being the best and -0.11 being the worst in terms of quality of life. This survey will be administered to patients at each visit, along with the other surveys.
8 weeks
Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: VAS Pain Score
Time Frame: Baseline
VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain score is a 0-10 numerical score assessing patient's subjective level of reported pain. The higher the score, the higher and worse the pain level. This will be recorded from the patient's written response at every visit.
Baseline
Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: VAS Pain Score
Time Frame: 4 weeks
VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain score is a 0-10 numerical score assessing patient's subjective level of reported pain. The higher the score, the higher and worse the pain level. This will be recorded from the patient's written response at every visit.
4 weeks
Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: VAS Pain Score
Time Frame: 8 weeks
VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain score is a 0-10 numerical score assessing patient's subjective level of reported pain. The higher the score, the higher and worse the pain level. This will be recorded from the patient's written response at every visit.
8 weeks
Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: EQ-VAS Score
Time Frame: Baseline
The EQ-VAS (EuroQol visual analog scale) is a vertical visual analogue scale that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health.
Baseline
Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: EQ-VAS Score
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The EQ-VAS (EuroQol visual analog scale) is a vertical visual analogue scale that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health.
4 weeks
Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment Group: EQ-VAS Score
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The EQ-VAS (EuroQol visual analog scale) is a vertical visual analogue scale that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health.
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anthony Sapienza, MD, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases; NYULMC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

October 17, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 2, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lateral Epicondylitis

Clinical Trials on Dexamethasone

3
Subscribe