Could the Stroke Volume Variation Predict a Fluid Responsiveness in Thoracotomy?

There are some risks of pulmonary edema in patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy with one lung ventilation. The overloading of fluid administration could be related to the development of pulmonary edema in patents after thoracic surgery. But fluid restriction may cause major organ hypoperfusion during the surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ability of stroke volume variation as an indicator for a fluid responsiveness in patient who receives pulmonary lobectomy via thoracotomy.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Pulmonary Tuberculosis; Pulmonary Neoplasm
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: fluid loading; Procedure: thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy; Procedure: thoracotomy

Detailed Description

Perioperative fluid management during thoracic surgery is a significantly important, because it is quite difficult to prevent pulmonary edema due to the fluid overload and compromise perfusion of vital organ. So, it is essential to maintain optimal organ perfusion by appropriate fluid management during thoracic surgery. Stroke volume variation (SVV) is derived from pulse contour analysis and it is known that SVV ≥12~15% correlate with fluid responsiveness, defined as a significant increase in cardiac output with fluid loading, dung two-lung ventilation. It is a parameter derived from changes in stroke volume (SV) that is according to the heart-lung interaction during mechanical ventilation. positive pressure ventilation induces cyclic changes in left ventricular SV that are related mainly to the expiratory decrease in right ventricular filling and ejection. This is a reflected by variations in the SV. However both ventilator issues, such as tidal volume, PEEP, chest and lung condition, and the cardiovascular condition, such as heart rate, rhythm, ventricular function, cardiac afterload, arterial compliance may affect SVV. Recently some studies reported that SVV could predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients under various conditions. But it is still unclear whether SVV could predict fluid responsiveness during one lung ventilation with the chest open via a thoracotomy. During one-lung ventilation, the shunted blood flow through the non-ventilated-lung dose not contribute to the generation of SVV. And with the chest opening by thoracotomy, the pressure generated by ventilator would not be transmitted to the pulmonary vessels but rather to the atmosphere. So, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the ability of SVV as an indicator a fluid responsiveness particularly in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation with thoracotomy and to found the optimal threshold value of SVV for fluid management during thoracic surgery.

• Study Type: Observational
• Enrollment (Actual): 79

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Korea, Republic of
  • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 135-710
    • Samsung Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 20 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The patients scheduled for pulmonary lobectomy with one lung ventilation by lung cancer, nodule, or pulmonary tuberculosis under thoracoscopy or thoracotomy in our hospital were included.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• The patients scheduled for pulmonary lobectomy with one lung ventilation by lung cancer, nodule, or pulmonary tuberculosis under thoracoscopy or thoracotomy in our hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

• The patients with known cardiac disease include arrythmia
• American society of anesthesia physical status III, IV, V

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Number of groups / cohorts

2

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort	Intervention / Treatment
thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy; to observe a fluid responsiveness in patients who receives scheduled thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy	Other: fluid loading; Fluid loading at defined period; 500ml colloid solution infusion at 20min after thorax open for 30min. 500ml colloid administration is a kind of routine procedure during pulmonary lobectomy in our hospital. We just control the fluid loading timing for hemodynamic parameter records.; Procedure: thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy; the patient group for scheduled thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy
open pulmonary lobectomy(thoracotomy); to observe a fluid responsiveness in patients who receives scheduled open pulmonary lobectomy(thoracotomy)	Other: fluid loading; Fluid loading at defined period; 500ml colloid solution infusion at 20min after thorax open for 30min. 500ml colloid administration is a kind of routine procedure during pulmonary lobectomy in our hospital. We just control the fluid loading timing for hemodynamic parameter records.; Procedure: thoracotomy; the patient group for scheduled open pulmonary lobectomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Changes from baseline in SVV, SVI after fluid loading	we are going to measure the SVV, SVI before and after fluid loading. Fluid responders were defined as patients demonstrating an increase in SVI ≥ 10% and non-responders as patients whose SVI changed < 10%. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for SVV of each group (responders and non responders). Threshold value of SVV was determined by considering values that yielded the greatest sensitivity and specificity from ROC curve	20min after thorax open and immediate after fluid loading for 30min

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Number of Participants with Adverse Events (pulmonary complication)	after surgery check chest x-ray It's the routine follow up after lobectomy.	participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
Number of Participants with Adverse Events (compromise perfusion of vital organ )	check perioperative urine output, and check post op serum creatine	participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Samsung Medical Center
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Hyun Joo Ahn, Samsung Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Jeong DM, Ahn HJ, Park HW, Yang M, Kim JA, Park J. Stroke Volume Variation and Pulse Pressure Variation Are Not Useful for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Thoracic Surgery. Anesth Analg. 2017 Oct;125(4):1158-1165. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002056.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: July 1, 2014
• Primary Completion (Actual): June 1, 2015
• Study Completion (Actual): June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: December 15, 2014
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 1, 2015
• First Posted (Estimate): January 5, 2015

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimate): October 7, 2016
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 6, 2016
• Last Verified: October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: fluid responsiveness; thoracotomy; One-lung ventilation; Stroke volume variation
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Infections; Respiratory Tract Infections; Respiratory Tract Diseases; Neoplasms; Lung Diseases; Neoplasms by Site; Respiratory Tract Neoplasms; Thoracic Neoplasms; Bacterial Infections; Bacterial Infections and Mycoses; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Actinomycetales Infections; Mycobacterium Infections; Lung Neoplasms; Tuberculosis; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
• Other Study ID Numbers: 2014-06-053-002