A Prospective Registry For Non Tuberculous Mycobacterial (NTM) Infections

February 20, 2017 updated by: Singapore General Hospital

The study aims to address the following aims

  1. To provide an overview of the epidemiology of the patients who are managed in the Singapore General Hospital for NTM infections.
  2. To evaluate the medical care of patients in the institution with regards to the type of medical and/or surgical treatment received and specifically, the antibiotic regime and duration administered.
  3. A longitudinal follow up which will allow an assessment of our care and patient outcome in this population cohort

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

Nontuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM) is difficult to treat and has no standardised antibiotic therapy. There have been increasing recognition of the need for measurements of NTM care around the world, as rates of NTM infections have begun to supercede Tuberculosis infections for the first time. As health care-associated NTM outbreaks also pose an infection control risk for patients undergoing surgery, this study provides a platform for further greater uniformity and opportunities for improvement in care. (1,2)

Singapore General Hospital (SGH) is a tertiary hospital and sees patients of various complex medical illnesses. Patients with Nontuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM) infections are also on follow up with the infectious diseases specialists SGH. The care of NTM patients can last many years, with patients requiring multiple admissions for reinfections/relapses and are often on long term suppressive therapy and follow up at the Specialist Outpatient Clinic. (3,4)The lack of standardised care for NTM patients, lengthy treatment time for NTM infections, as well as increases in macrolide-resistant NTM infections, warrants a need for research into the epidemiology and best practice to treat this group of patients. (5,6) We seek to better define the epidemiology of this group of patients and hope to objectively measure the effectiveness and quality of our NTM care delivery in SGH.

Currently there is a lack of a systematic database to track our quality of care and support services. As there are many Infectious Diseases Specialists in the department, each may have slight variation in clinical practice and preference in the face of a lack of proper treatment guideline. We believe NTM management can be improved with a consistent care delivery pathway and more standardization of therapy and follow up plan. This will lead to better desired patient outcome. This prospective observational data collection will allow us to evaluate our current standard of care for these patients, which can lead to identification for areas of improvement so that we can refine our strategies and implement more effective and standardized guidelines in the future.

  1. Griffith DE, Aksamit T, Brown-Elliott BA, Catanzaro A, Daley C, Gordin F, Holland SM, Horsburgh R, Huitt G, Iademarco MF, Iseman M, Olivier K, Ruoss S, von Reyn CF, Wallace RJ Jr, Winthrop K. An Official ATS/IDSA Statement: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007; Feb 15;175(4):367-416
  2. Cook JL. Nontuberculous mycobacteria: opportunistic environmental pathogens for predisposed hosts. Br Med Bull 2010;96:45-59
  3. Piersimoni C. Nontuberculous mycobacteria infection in solid organ transplant recipients. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 2012 Apr;31(4):397-403
  4. Payen MC, De Wit S, Clumeck N. Manifestations, diagnosis and treatment of non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections in patients with HIV infection. Revue des Maladies Respiratoires 1997 Dec;14 Suppl 5:S142-51
  5. Russell CD, Claxton P, Doig C, Seagar AL, Rayner A, Laurenson IF. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria: a retrospective review of Scottish isolates from 2000 to 2010. Thorax 2013 [Epub ahead of print]
  6. Binder AM, Adjemian J, Olivier KN, Prevots DR. Epidemiology of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Infections and Associated Chronic Macrolide Use among Persons with Cystic Fibrosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2013; [Epub ahead of print]

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 169856
        • Recruiting
        • Singapore General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 100 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients diagnosed with NTM infection in the institution

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients diagnosed with Nontuberculous Mycobacteria infections.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All cause mortality
Time Frame: 5 years
Patients will be followed up on an outpatient basis and mortality outcomes (all cause) at 6 months, 1 year and 5 years will be monitored.
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical response
Time Frame: 6 months from start of treatment
Managing clinician will judge the clinical response post-induction and post-maintenance treatment. Responses classified as resolved, improved, stable or worse.
6 months from start of treatment
Microbiological response
Time Frame: 6 months from start of treatment
This is specifically for NTM infections involving the lung. Sputum samples will be collected regularly in the 6 month period to document clearance of NTM growth from the sputum. A microbiological response would be classified as 2-3 negative consecutive sputum cultures in the 6 month period.
6 months from start of treatment
Chest Xray changes
Time Frame: 6 months
This is specifically for NTM infections involving the lung. Chest Xray post completion of treatment will be assess and classified as resolved, improved, stable or worse.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Benjamin Dr Cherng, MBBS, Singapore General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 4, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 23, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous

3
Subscribe