Protocol: Balance Training in Parkinson's Disease

November 1, 2018 updated by: University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol: Balance Training With Rhythmical Cues to Improve and Maintain Balance Control in Parkinson's Disease

Postural instability is a particularly incapacitating disorder, where loss of motor independence by Parkinson´s Disease (PD) patients marks a significant stage of disease onset. Evidence suggests that deficits in automatic motor control, sensory integration and attention are associated with lack of balance in PD. Physiotherapy, together with medication, plays an important role in the treatment of this state, although no consensus has been reached on the best treatment modality. The aim of this randomized controlled trial protocol is to evaluate the effects of balance training with rhythmical (BRT), which is a motor program to improve balance associated with rhythmical auditory cues (RACs)

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

A total of 150 PD patients at H&Y stages II-III and asymptomatic for depression and dementia are enrolled in a single-blind randomized study. Randomization is achieved via a computer-generated random-sequence table. All patients should also present a fall history.They will be assigned into one of three groups, and their balance and gait will be assessed before and after 10 training sessions, and after 4 and 30 weeks subsequent to the end of the training. Balance will be assess by Mini BESTest (MBESTest), BERG Test (BBS) and Postural Stress Test (PST). Gait will be evaluate by the Timed Up and Go test (TUG). Independence in Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) will be assess through interviews; and UPDRS, through motor performance. The BRT group received a motor program to improve balance associated with RACs, the MT group performed motor training with the same aims as those in the BRT group but without RACs, and the control group (CG) was trained only in orientations. The exercise program specific to balance is of 5 weeks' duration with two sessions per week, 45 minutes each, and consists of general physiotherapy exercises. Each session is divided into five warm-up minutes-30 minutes for the main part and 10 minutes for the cool down. The training progresses and intensifies each week depending on the individual's performance. The subjects should be able to execute 10 repetitions of the exercise sequences correctly to progress to the next movement.

The training progressed and increased in intensity on each week. On the first week, before the training, each exercise was explained and demonstrated by the physiotherapist, who demanded special attention on the most difficult aspects of movement execution. The subjects performed 05 repetitions (5 RM) of each exercise.

On the first phase the patients may present some mistakes and might need specific information to correct the movement that is on execution. The exercises will be repeat in the next sessions in order to consolidate learning. The subjects must have been capable of associating the corrections to the exercises that will proposs on the first week. In each group repetition, for both groups, the physiotherapist will use a verbal command before each movement change, anticipating it and requesting attention to the most difficult ones. Only the GBRT will be oriented to focus on the rhythmical auditory cues. On the second week, the subjects will perform a series of 10 repetitions (10 RM) and on the third week, 2 series of 10 repetitions (20RM). On the fourth week, subjects must have been able to execute 20RM of the exercise sequences with an increase in speed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Sao Paulo, Brazil
        • University of Sao Paulo Clinical Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All of the subjects will be diagnosed by neurologists from the Movement Disorders Ambulatory Clinic of the University of São Paulo Faculty of Medicine Clinics Hospital, according to the UK Brain Bank criteria [36] and should be at H&Y classification stage II or III, with a Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) [37] score of above 24.
  • All patients should also present fall history.
  • They should have the capacity to ambulate independently indoors without aid.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • These are the presence of neurological, orthopedic or cardiopulmonary problems, an unstable medication regime, and an inability to understand or adhere to the protocol because of, for example, cognitive, auditory or visual problems.
  • Patients receiving physical therapy training will also be excluded from the training.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Motor training
Balance training, Screening to prevent falls
Balance training with rhythmical (BRT), is a motor program to improve balance associated with rhythmical auditory cues (RACs).
Questionary to Scheduled screening falls and progression in training will be used to indicate the capacity to continue to progress.
Experimental: Balance RhytmicalTraining
Balance training, Screening to prevent falls
Balance training with rhythmical (BRT), is a motor program to improve balance associated with rhythmical auditory cues (RACs).
Questionary to Scheduled screening falls and progression in training will be used to indicate the capacity to continue to progress.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mini BESTest (MBESTest)
Time Frame: 30 weeks
Clinical balance assessment tool that aims to target different balance control systems so that specific rehabilitation approaches can be designed for different balance deficits.
30 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Time Frame: 30 weeks
Berg Balance Scale assesses the functional balance of patients with Parkinson´s disease. It is a clinic assessment of patient that evaluate the antecipatory postural adjustments and the performance of patient to stand up and sit down, turn on and step, among others situations.
30 weeks
UPDRS
Time Frame: 30 weeks
The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) is a rating scale used to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease
30 weeks
Timed Up and Go test (TUG)
Time Frame: 30 weeks
The Timed Up and Go test is a short, practical test by which gait and balance are tested
30 weeks
Push and Release Test
Time Frame: 30 weeks
by which an unexpected, quick and firm jerk on the shoulder is given in a backward direction.It is a clinic assessment of patient that evaluate the compensatory postural adjustments
30 weeks
New Freezing of gait questonary (NFoG)
Time Frame: 30 weeks
Questionay - measures of freezing of gait
30 weeks
Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I)
Time Frame: 30 weeks
The FES-I is a scale used to assessment the fear of falling.
30 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Maria Elisa P Piemonte, PhD, University of Sao Paulo
  • Principal Investigator: Tamine TC Capato, Master, University of Sao Paulo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

July 2, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Balance Training

3
Subscribe