Gestational Age Assessment Tool (GestATion)

May 11, 2018 updated by: University of Nottingham

Gestational Age Assessment Tool for Newborn Babies

In the UK and worldwide many babies are born without carers knowing their gestation as the mothers will not have had good antenatal care. It is possible to estimate gestation but this requires a detailed clinical exam. The investigators wish to improve this by using software analysis to pick out features of the baby (face and foot) to try and estimate the gestation of the baby once it is born. The investigators will also look explore if the software can distinguish the normal face or a baby in discomfort.

Good estimation of gestation can result in more targeted management of the baby. The investigators will capture the images of newborn babies, from a variety of gestations, and use this dataset to teach the software to estimate gestational age and level of discomfort.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Clinical techniques for the calculation of gestation include fetal ultrasound and clinical assessment tools, such as the Ballard Score, following birth. These techniques are rarely available (ultrasound which is expensive and requires trained users) or require significant training (Ballard) which makes them unsuitable for large scale assessment in many low-middle income (LMI) countries. In the UK, the gestational age of babies of mothers with no antenatal care requires a detailed clinical examination which can lack accuracy. Clinical assessment of postnatal gestational age utilises anatomical characteristics of the face, ear and foot during newborn development. There is an element of subjectiveness which reduces the precision of such an assessment which is only reduced with significant training and experience. Simpler techniques of postnatal gestational age assessment such as anthropometric measures are time consuming and lack the accuracy required. Emerging evidence suggests that gestational age can be calculated postnatally by measuring the newborn foot length and comparing to population appropriate charts. However, when used on their own, the specificity and sensitivity are still below acceptable limits to allow universal adoption.

New software-based analytical techniques now make it possible to perform fully automatic recognition of facial actions and dimensions. The investigators have developed techniques that allow live video facial feature identification and measurement using advanced analytical techniques of muscle actions. These techniques have been used for facial expression analysis as well as automated facial feature localization. The investigators propose that the same analysis could be used to create a unique gestational age assessment tool using a simple brief video clip of the newborns' face and foot.

Accurate assessment of gestational age, especially in LMI countries, could ensure high risk newborns receive appropriate low cost interventions to reduce morbidity and mortality. In the UK this could allow better estimation of babies born to mothers with no antenatal care where the gestational age is unclear. We propose a smartphone based, ethnic appropriate, combined face and foot video analysis tool to accurately determine gestational age of the newborn. Such a system could adapted to incorporate pain assessment tools to help inform treatment options and study new therapies.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nottinghamshire
      • Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom, NG72UH
        • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 6 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Newborn babies within 7 days of birth recruited from Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Where the baby's gestational age is known (based on antenatal care)
  • With written informed parental consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No parental consent
  • Babies undergoing palliative care

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Newborn Infant
Newborn babies (within 7 days of birth) born between 23-42 weeks.
Images of baby's face (including ear) and feet

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Software analysis tool estimates the gestational age of a newborn baby to within 1 week of its actual gestation
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantification of pain from facial features during uncomfortable procedures.
Time Frame: 12 months
Comparison with two pain scores, the neonatal Pain Assessment Tool (PAT, scored 0 (no pain) to 10 (significant pain)) and the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS, scored 0 (no pain) to 7 (significant pain)). The software will be calibrated from these pain scores. This approach hasn't previously been performed so the software scoring system will be developed alongside these commonly used measures.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Don Sharkey, PhD, University of Nottingham

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

May 11, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 4, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

August 27, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Premature Birth

Clinical Trials on Image acquisition

3
Subscribe