- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02544451
Rollover Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Long-term Treatment With Lumacaftor in Combination With Ivacaftor
A Phase 3, Rollover Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Long-term Treatment With Lumacaftor in Combination With Ivacaftor in Subjects Aged 6 Years and Older With Cystic Fibrosis, Homozygous for the F508del-CFTR Mutation
Study Overview
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Herston, Australia
-
New Lambton Heights, Australia
-
Subiaco, Australia
-
Westmead, Australia
-
-
Victoria
-
Parkville, Victoria, Australia
-
-
-
-
-
Brussels, Belgium
-
Leuven, Belgium
-
-
-
-
British Columbia
-
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
-
-
Quebec
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
-
-
-
-
-
Copenhagen, Denmark
-
-
-
-
-
Bordeaux Cedex, France
-
Paris, France
-
Paris Cedex 15, France
-
-
Cedex
-
Bron, Cedex, France
-
-
-
-
-
Berlin, Germany
-
Giessen, Germany
-
Hanover, Germany
-
Koeln, Germany
-
-
-
-
-
Stockholm, Sweden
-
-
-
-
-
Belfast, United Kingdom
-
Edinburgh, United Kingdom
-
London, United Kingdom
-
-
West Yorkshire
-
Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
-
-
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
-
-
Arizona
-
Tucson, Arizona, United States
-
-
California
-
Long Beach, California, United States
-
Palo Alto, California, United States
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, United States
-
-
Delaware
-
Wilmington, Delaware, United States
-
-
Florida
-
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
-
Orlando, Florida, United States
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
-
-
Iowa
-
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
-
-
Minnesota
-
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
-
-
Missouri
-
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
-
-
Nebraska
-
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
-
-
New Hampshire
-
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
-
-
New York
-
Buffalo, New York, United States
-
Syracuse, New York, United States
-
-
North Carolina
-
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
-
Dayton, Ohio, United States
-
-
Oregon
-
Portland, Oregon, United States
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
-
-
South Carolina
-
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
-
-
Texas
-
Austin, Texas, United States
-
Houston, Texas, United States
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
-
-
Vermont
-
Colchester, Vermont, United States
-
-
Virginia
-
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
-
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
-
Richmond, Virginia, United States
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
-
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Subjects entering the Treatment Cohort must meet both of the following criteria:
- Completed study visits up to Week 24 of Study 109 or Week 26 of Study 011B and did not permanently discontinue treatment
- Willing to remain on a stable CF medication through the Safety Follow-up Visit.
Subjects entering the Observational Cohort must meet 1 of the following criteria:
- Completed 24 weeks of study drug treatment in Study 109 or completed 24 weeks of study drug treatment and the Week 26 Safety Follow up in Study 011B.
- Received at least 4 weeks of study drug and completed visits up to Week 24 of Study 109 or Week 26 of Study 011B.
Exclusion Criteria (Treatment Cohort Only):
- History of any comorbidity or laboratory abnormality that, in the opinion of the investigator, might confound the results of the study or pose an additional risk in administering study drug to the subject (e.g., cirrhosis with portal hypertension).
- Pregnant and nursing females.
- Sexually active subjects of reproductive potential who are not willing to follow the contraception requirements.
- History of drug intolerance in the prior study that would pose an additional risk to the subject in the opinion of investigator
- History of poor compliance with study drug and/or procedure in the previous study as deemed by the investigator.
- Participation in an investigational drug trial (including studies investigating lumacaftor and/or ivacaftor).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Treatment Period 1: LUM/IVA to LUM/IVA
|
Lumacaftor (LUM) 200 mg every 12 hours (q12h)/ivacaftor (IVA) 250 mg q12h (for 6 through 11 years of age). LUM 400 mg q12h/IVA 250 mg q12h (for 12 years and older).
Other Names:
LUM 200 mg q12h/IVA 250 mg q12h (for 6 through 11 years of age).
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Treatment Period 1: Placebo (PBO) to LUM/IVA
|
Lumacaftor (LUM) 200 mg every 12 hours (q12h)/ivacaftor (IVA) 250 mg q12h (for 6 through 11 years of age). LUM 400 mg q12h/IVA 250 mg q12h (for 12 years and older).
Other Names:
LUM 200 mg q12h/IVA 250 mg q12h (for 6 through 11 years of age).
Other Names:
|
No Intervention: Treatment Period 1: Observational Cohort
|
|
Experimental: Treatment Period 2: LUM/IVA
|
Lumacaftor (LUM) 200 mg every 12 hours (q12h)/ivacaftor (IVA) 250 mg q12h (for 6 through 11 years of age). LUM 400 mg q12h/IVA 250 mg q12h (for 12 years and older).
Other Names:
LUM 200 mg q12h/IVA 250 mg q12h (for 6 through 11 years of age).
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Treatment Period 1 (Treatment Cohorts): Safety and Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Day 1 up to Week 100
|
Day 1 up to Week 100
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Absolute Change in Lung Clearance Index (LCI) 2.5
Time Frame: From Parent Study Baseline at Week 96
|
LCI 2.5 represents the number of lung turnovers required to reduce the end tidal inert gas concentration to 1/40th of its starting value.
|
From Parent Study Baseline at Week 96
|
Absolute Change in Sweat Chloride
Time Frame: From Parent Study Baseline at Week 96
|
Sweat samples were collected using an approved collection device.
|
From Parent Study Baseline at Week 96
|
Absolute Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: From Parent Study Baseline at Week 96
|
BMI was defined as weight in kilograms divided by height in square meter (m^2).
|
From Parent Study Baseline at Week 96
|
Absolute Change in Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) Respiratory Domain Score
Time Frame: From Parent Study Baseline at Week 96
|
The CFQ-R is a validated participant-reported outcome measuring health-related quality of life for participants with cystic fibrosis.
Respiratory domain assessed respiratory symptoms, score range: 0-100; higher scores indicating fewer symptoms and better health-related quality of life.
|
From Parent Study Baseline at Week 96
|
Observational Cohort: Safety as Assessed by Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Day 1 up to Week 100
|
Day 1 up to Week 100
|
|
Absolute Change in LCI 5.0
Time Frame: From Parent Study Baseline at Week 96
|
LCI 5.0 represents the number of lung turnovers required to reduce the end tidal inert gas concentration to 1/20th of its starting value.
|
From Parent Study Baseline at Week 96
|
Absolute Change in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (ppFEV1)
Time Frame: From Parent Study Baseline at Week 96
|
FEV1 is the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out in one second, after full inspiration.
|
From Parent Study Baseline at Week 96
|
Relative Change in ppFEV1
Time Frame: From Parent Study Baseline at Week 96
|
FEV1 is the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out in one second, after full inspiration.
|
From Parent Study Baseline at Week 96
|
Absolute Change in BMI-for-age Z-score
Time Frame: From Parent Study Baseline at Week 96
|
BMI was defined as weight in kilograms divided by height in m^2.
z-score is a statistical measure to describe whether a mean was above or below the standard.
A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean and is considered normal.
Lower numbers indicate values lower than the mean and higher numbers indicate values higher than the mean.
|
From Parent Study Baseline at Week 96
|
Absolute Change in Weight
Time Frame: From Parent Study Baseline at Week 96
|
From Parent Study Baseline at Week 96
|
|
Absolute Change in Weight-for-age Z-score
Time Frame: From Parent Study Baseline at Week 96
|
z-score is a statistical measure to describe whether a mean was above or below the standard.
A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean and is considered normal.
Lower numbers indicate values lower than the mean and higher numbers indicate values higher than the mean.
|
From Parent Study Baseline at Week 96
|
Absolute Change in Height
Time Frame: From Parent Study Baseline at Week 96
|
From Parent Study Baseline at Week 96
|
|
Absolute Change in Height-for-age Z-score
Time Frame: From Parent Study Baseline at Week 96
|
z-score is a statistical measure to describe whether a mean was above or below the standard.
A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean and is considered normal.
Lower numbers indicate values lower than the mean and higher numbers indicate values higher than the mean.
|
From Parent Study Baseline at Week 96
|
Absolute Change in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Total Domain Score
Time Frame: From Parent Study Baseline at Week 96
|
The TSQM measures participants' experiences with their medication on four dimensions: effectiveness, side effects, convenience and global satisfaction.
For each dimension, responses are added and transformed in the total domain score, which ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
|
From Parent Study Baseline at Week 96
|
Time-to-first Pulmonary Exacerbation
Time Frame: From Parent Study Baseline through Week 96
|
Pulmonary exacerbation was defined as the treatment with new or changed antibiotic therapy (intravenous, inhaled, or oral) for greater than or equal to 4 sinopulmonary signs/symptoms.
|
From Parent Study Baseline through Week 96
|
Percentage of Participants Having At Least 1 Pulmonary Exacerbation Event
Time Frame: From Parent Study Baseline through Week 96
|
Pulmonary exacerbation was defined as the treatment with new or changed antibiotic therapy (intravenous, inhaled, or oral) for greater than or equal to 4 sinopulmonary signs/symptoms.
|
From Parent Study Baseline through Week 96
|
Number of Pulmonary Exacerbation Events Per Patient-year
Time Frame: From Parent Study Baseline through Week 96
|
Pulmonary exacerbation was defined as the treatment with new or changed antibiotic therapy (intravenous, inhaled, or oral) for greater than or equal to 4 sinopulmonary signs/symptoms.
|
From Parent Study Baseline through Week 96
|
Rate of Change in LCI 2.5
Time Frame: Day 15 after first dose of LUM/IVA through Week 96
|
Rate of change analysis evaluates the change in LCI 2.5 after long term treatment with LUM/IVA.
A rate of change equal to zero would indicate that treatment effects were stable.
|
Day 15 after first dose of LUM/IVA through Week 96
|
Rate of Change in LCI 5.0
Time Frame: Day 15 after first dose of LUM/IVA through Week 96
|
Rate of change analysis evaluates the change in LCI 5.0 after long term treatment with LUM/IVA.
A rate of change equal to zero would indicate that treatment effects were stable.
|
Day 15 after first dose of LUM/IVA through Week 96
|
Rate of Change in ppFEV1
Time Frame: Day 15 after first dose of LUM/IVA through Week 96
|
Rate of change analysis evaluates the change in ppFEV1 after long term treatment with LUM/IVA.
A rate of change equal to zero would indicate that treatment effects were stable.
|
Day 15 after first dose of LUM/IVA through Week 96
|
Treatment Period 2: Safety and Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Day 1 up to Week 168
|
Day 1 up to Week 168
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- VX15-809-110
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cystic Fibrosis
-
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegreUnknownCystic Fibrosis | Cystic Fibrosis Pulmonary Exacerbation | Cystic Fibrosis in Children | Cystic Fibrosis With ExacerbationBrazil
-
University of Colorado, DenverCystic Fibrosis FoundationTerminatedCystic Fibrosis-related Diabetes | Cystic Fibrosis Pulmonary Exacerbation | Cystic Fibrosis in ChildrenUnited States
-
Royal College of Surgeons, IrelandThe Hospital for Sick Children; Imperial College London; Erasmus Medical Center; University College Dublin and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingCystic Fibrosis | Adherence, Medication | Cystic Fibrosis Gastrointestinal Disease | Cystic Fibrosis in Children | Cystic Fibrosis Liver DiseaseUnited Kingdom, Ireland
-
Herlev and Gentofte HospitalCopenhagen University Hospital, DenmarkActive, not recruitingMyocardial Infarction | Heart Diseases | Heart Failure | Stroke | Cystic Fibrosis | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Left Ventricular Dysfunction | Cystic Fibrosis-related Diabetes | Cystic Fibrosis Gastrointestinal Disease | Cystic Fibrosis of Pancreas | Cystic Fibrosis, Pulmonary | Cystic...Denmark
-
The Hospital for Sick ChildrenCanadian Cystic Fibrosis FoundationActive, not recruitingCystic Fibrosis | Cystic Fibrosis Gastrointestinal Disease | Cystic Fibrosis in ChildrenCanada
-
Arrowhead PharmaceuticalsTerminatedCystic Fibrosis, PulmonaryAustralia, New Zealand
-
AzurRx SASCompletedCystic Fibrosis | Cystic Fibrosis Gastrointestinal Disease | Cystic Fibrosis of PancreasTurkey, Hungary
-
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterTrustees of Dartmouth CollegeWithdrawnCystic Fibrosis-related Diabetes | Cystic Fibrosis Liver Disease | CF - Cystic FibrosisUnited States
-
University of PortsmouthUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust; Loughborough University; Queen Alexandra HospitalTerminated
-
University Hospital, BordeauxCompleted
Clinical Trials on LUM/IVA
-
Vertex Pharmaceuticals IncorporatedCompletedCystic FibrosisUnited States, Canada
-
Vertex Pharmaceuticals IncorporatedCompletedCystic Fibrosis, Homozygous for the F508del CFTR MutationUnited States, France, Spain, Belgium, Canada, Austria, Australia, Germany, United Kingdom, Denmark
-
Vertex Pharmaceuticals IncorporatedCompletedCystic FibrosisAustralia, United Kingdom
-
Vertex Pharmaceuticals IncorporatedCompletedCystic FibrosisNetherlands
-
Vertex Pharmaceuticals IncorporatedCompletedCystic Fibrosis, Homozygous for the F508del CFTR MutationUnited States, Germany, Canada, Netherlands, Czech Republic, Italy, Ireland, Sweden, United Kingdom, Australia, France
-
Vertex Pharmaceuticals IncorporatedCompletedCystic FibrosisUnited States, Canada
-
Vertex Pharmaceuticals IncorporatedCompleted
-
Vertex Pharmaceuticals IncorporatedCompleted
-
Vertex Pharmaceuticals IncorporatedCompletedCystic FibrosisUnited States, Canada
-
Vertex Pharmaceuticals IncorporatedCompletedCystic FibrosisUnited States, France, United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, New Zealand, Belgium