An Evaluation of a New Nonverbal Treatment for Global Aphasia

January 27, 2020 updated by: University College, London

An Investigation Into the Effect of a Novel, Non Verbal, Cognitive Treatment on Functional Communication in Global Aphasia

People with global aphasia (PwGA) post stroke have little to no meaningful communication abilities (ie limited comprehension, spoken language, reading and writing abilities).A proportion of PwGA will also have limited abilities to use any alternative means of communication e.g. gesture, pictures or computer devices. There is a suggestion in the literature that this is because of co-occurring cognitive deficits. The consequence is that these clients are unable to reliably communicate even their basic needs.This is commonly known as having no functional communication abilities. Such PwGA tend not to respond to standard speech and language therapy interventions.

This research will investigate the effect of a new cognitive intervention designed to improve basic functional communication abilities. The treatment will be nonverbal and involve computer and paperbased tasks ordered hierarchically from basic to more complex tasks. Six to eight participants will take part. All their sessions will take place in their own home. For some this may be a care home. They will first complete a diagnostic communication assessment in order for baseline abilities to be established. Further formal language and cognitive assessments will be conducted over a period of 6 weeks. A relative/friend will complete a questionnaires about mood/communication. The PwGA will also be videoed interacting with the research student e.g. looking at a magazine, completing a jigsaw, answering questions and making choices non-verbally.

The participants then receive the new intervention 3 times a week for 6 consecutive weeks. All intervention sessions will be videoed. Then participants will be reassessed over 2 weeks using the same assessments as prior to the intervention. The questionnaire with their relative/friend and videoed activity session will also be repeated. After a twelve week break the participant will be videoed interacting with the research student complete some of the assessments again and their relative will re-complete the questionnaires.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

6

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, WC1N
        • University College London, Research Dept of Language and Cognition

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • have global aphasia as diagnosed by an SLT
  • have little or no verbal output
  • inconsistent single word comprehension
  • little or no ability to read or write
  • little or no ability to use alternative modes of communication
  • Little or no ability to make choices in function
  • no diagnosis/history of a progressive neurological condition
  • no diagnosis of hearing loss
  • no diagnosis/history of a mental health condition
  • English as a first language

Exclusion Criteria:

  • has another form of aphasia
  • is able to consistently express basic needs non-verbally or verbally.
  • is able to participate in communicative interaction with a familiar other
  • has a history of a progressive neurological condition
  • has hearing loss
  • has a diagnosis/history of a mental health condition
  • does not have English as a first language.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: BASELINE TESTING
Language and cognitive assessments conducted
Experimental: Treatment

Intervention given:

visual tracking pressing a button every time a picture is seen on the screen

  • playing dominoes and snap
  • pressing a button every time a specific picture is seen on the screen
  • Pressing a button every time a specific sound is heard
  • Matching objects to a picture
  • Matching gestures to objects
  • Matching two connected objects
  • Sorting objects by categories
  • Matching sounds to objects
  • "Complete the category" and "odd on out with objects"
  • Choosing target objects by pointing
  • Choosing objects to complete the category by pointing

The tasks are:

  • visually tracking a picture as it moves across the computer screen
  • pressing a button every time a picture is seen on the screen
  • pressing a button every time a specific picture is seen on the screen
  • Pressing a button every time a specific sound is heard
  • Matching objects to a picture
  • Matching gestures to objects
  • Matching two connected objects
  • Sorting objects by categories
  • Matching sounds to objects
  • "Complete the category" and "odd on out with objects"
  • Choosing target objects by pointing
  • Choosing objects to complete the category by pointing
No Intervention: Post intervention
Repeated testing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
American Speech and Hearing Association -Functional Assessment of Communication
Time Frame: 27 weeks
Questionnaire completed by friend/relative
27 weeks
Constructed Interaction Task
Time Frame: 27 weeks
video recorded interaction
27 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Aphasia Screening Test
Time Frame: 14 weeks
Language assessment
14 weeks
Mood Screen
Time Frame: 27 weeks
depression screening tool
27 weeks
Pyramids and Palm Trees Test
Time Frame: 27 weeks
pictorial semantic assessment
27 weeks
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
Time Frame: 14 weeks
cognitive assessment
14 weeks
Butt Non verbal reasoning test
Time Frame: 27 weeks
cognitive assessment
27 weeks
Western Aphasia Battery cognitive sub test
Time Frame: 14 weeks
cognitive assessment
14 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Suzanne Beeke, PhD, UCL

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

September 10, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Cognitive therapy

Subscribe