Changes in Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover (Serum CTX and PlNP) After Initiation of a "Drug Holiday" From Bisphosphonates

Bisphosphonates (BP) are widely used in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and older men. Recently, there has been concern about the risk of adverse events after several years of using these agents. This has resulted in a publication from the Food and Drug Administration that suggested that, for many individuals, a holiday from bisphosphonates might be considered after 4-5 years of continuous use. In that publication there was little, if any, guidance on how clinicians should proceed after the holiday is initiated.

Study Overview

• Status: Unknown
• Conditions: Osteoporosis
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: No intervention

Detailed Description

Bisphosphonates (BP) are widely used in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and older men. Recently, there has been concern about the risk of adverse events after several years of using these agents. This has resulted in a publication from the Food and Drug Administration that suggested that, for many individuals, a holiday from bisphosphonates might be considered after 4-5 years of continuous use. In that publication there was little, if any, guidance on how clinicians should proceed after the holiday is initiated.

Bisphosphonates likely work by first binding to the hydroxyapatite crystal, and when the crystal is dissolved in the acid medium created by osteoclasts in the process of bone resorption, the bisphosphonate is released, and is incorporated into the osteoclast where it inhibits farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase and interferes with intracellular protein trafficking. The consequence is loss of osteoclast resorptive activity and in some cases osteoclast apoptosis. Thus the potency of any particular bisphosphonate is dependent on independent processes, such as the binding affinity to hydroxyapatite and the potency of enzyme inhibition. As patients remain on bisphosphonates, it is likely that more and more of the drug will become incorporated into the skeleton. Therefore, when the drugs are discontinued, they gradually leach from the skeleton. The rate at which the effects of the drug wear off ("off-rate"), as evidenced by changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover, should be dependent on the binding affinity. The length of time for which the pharmacologic effect continues will also be dependent on potency of enzyme inhibition. Thus, each bisphosphonate will likely have a unique off-rate. Data from the extensions of some of the clinical trials support the concept of variable off rates, but there are no head to head data to determine this. Furthermore, clinical trial data may have limited utility in patients seen in a practice setting.

Biochemical markers have been shown in a number of studies to be reliable surrogate markers for the overall rate of bone remodeling in the skeleton. After menopause or ovariectomy, serum levels of biochemical markers increase and these increments have been associated with the rate of bone loss as measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). As individuals age, fracture risk is determined by both age and bone mineral density (BMD). Trabecular bone score (TBS), an advanced application for DXA, describes the quality of bone microarchitecture, which has been shown to impact bone strength and thus fracture risk.

In clinical trial data where bisphosphonates have been discontinued and subjects continue to be followed, biochemical markers increase after the drug is stopped, and presumably the fracture benefit of the drug will be gradually lost. Concern over possible association of the long term side effects of bisphosphonates (notably osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical fractures of the femoral shaft) have led to a concept, endorsed by FDA, of a drug holiday. At present there are no guidelines on how patients should be followed when the drugs are discontinued. From the clinical trial data in different subject populations with differing protocols, as well as in vitro data, the inference may be drawn that the off effects will vary with different drugs. It is hypothesized that risedronate will lose its effect more rapidly than alendronate. However, this concept has never been studied in a prospective clinical study. Therefore, the intent in this prospective study is to examine patients who are about to be taken off of 2 different bisphosphonate drugs and compare their off rates using two established biochemical markers (sCTX and P1NP).

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Anticipated): 120
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • District of Columbia
    • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20036
      • Recruiting
      • Taylor C. Wallace
      • Contact: Paul Miller, MD; Phone Number: 303-980-9475; Email: millerccbr@aol.com
      • Contact: Debi Aggers; Phone Number: 3039809475; Email: dnaggers@aol.com

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Postmenopausal women or males >50 years who have taken oral bisphosphonates (risedronate or alendronate) for five years or more, and in whom it is considered reasonable to initiate a holiday from the medication, or those who have been on a holiday for up to 3 months will be eligible for screening visit.

2. Subjects whose 25(0H) D level is above 30 ng/ml (subjects with 25(0H)D from 10-29 ng/ml may be included after supplementation and assessment of serum 25(0H)D) level is above 30 ng/ml.

   -

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Current steroid treatment at or greater than 5 mg/day prednisone or equivalent.
2. The use of any other bone active medication other than risedronate or alendronate.
3. The use of teriparatide within the past 4 years.
4. A contra-indication to the discontinuation of bisphosphonate (e.g. fracture during treatment, extremely low t-score).
5. Subjects with fasting serum sCTX less than 100 pg/ml or greater than 300 pg/mL while taking bisphosphonates.
6. Failure to bring 25(0H)D serum level to 30 ng/ml or greater.
7. Metabolic bone disease other than osteoporosis.
8. Abnormal thyroid function (may be included when thyroid function is shown to be normal by TSH). Per local lab assessment.
9. Evidence of failure to adhere to bisphosphonate use -

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Allocation: Non-Randomized
• Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

1

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Discontinuing usage; Patients will discontinue use of bisphosphonates. Bone markers and BMD will be monitored until a need for reinitiation of treatment within 2-years is identified or needed.	Other: No intervention; No intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Time Frame
Changes in bone turnover markers.	2 years
Changes in bone mineral density	2 years
Changes in trabecular bone score	2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: National Bone Health Alliance
• Collaborators: Roche Pharma AG; National Osteoporosis Foundation

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: June 1, 2015
• Primary Completion (Anticipated): June 1, 2016
• Study Completion (Anticipated): June 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: October 10, 2015
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 13, 2015
• First Posted (Estimate): October 14, 2015

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimate): October 14, 2015
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 13, 2015
• Last Verified: October 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Metabolic Diseases; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Bone Diseases; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Osteoporosis
• Other Study ID Numbers: NBHADH1