Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Transcollation Technology to Reduce Bleeding in Lung Surgery

December 12, 2015 updated by: Mohsen Ibrahim, University of Roma La Sapienza

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Transcollation Technology to Reduce Bleeding in Lung Surgery

Major lung resection is one of the most common procedures performed in thoracic surgery, but it may involve considerable bleeding and the occasional need for a transfusion and/or reoperation for bleeding in specific cases. In addition, lysis of pleural-parenchymal adhesions and dissection can represent a challenge in patients who have undergone chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy, and in patients with bronchiectasis or COPD. Several intraoperative methods have been used to manage blood loss, including topical haemostatic agents, bipolar sealers or electrocautery. Transcollation technology (TT) consists of a disposable bipolar sealer that uses a radiofrequency coagulation system to deliver a saline solution that provides haemostatic sealing of soft tissue and bone and provides localized cooling without charring. Blood loss reduction has been previously described in several fields of surgery.

The primary end-point of the proposed trial is to assess if the ability of Transcollation Technology in reducing the proportion of patients showing bleeding perioperatively within the setting of a prospective randomized controlled trial.

The secondary end-point is to assess if Transcollation Technology is able to improve postoperative outcomes reducing the length of hospital stay.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study participation will start at signature of informed consent and each subject will be assessed preoperatively, within 4 weeks before surgery. A patient information leaflet will form the basis of discussions with the patient before written informed consent is obtained.

Patients will be evaluated intra-operatively, at 24 and 48 hours after surgery, and at discharge.

At the preoperative visit, the following information will be recorded on the patient's Case Report Form by a specialist Registrar:

  • Patient number
  • Patient initials
  • Date of visit
  • Demography (date of birth, sex, height, and weight)
  • Preoperative FEV1 and % predicted FEV1
  • Co-morbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [yes/no], current smoking habit [yes/no])
  • levels of hemoglobin (preoperative, postoperative, 24 h, 48 h and discharged)
  • perioperative complication.

Interventions

Patients undergoing Major Lung Surgery will be randomly assigned to one of two management strategies before the starting of the operation:

  1. Electrocautery Using routine instrument for hilar dissection, hemostasis and lisys of eventual pleural adhesions.
  2. Transcollation Technology Using Transcollation Technology for hilar dissection, hemostasis and lisys of eventual pleural adhesions.

Randomization Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to Transcollation technology (TT) or electrocautery. Patients will be allocated to the two different groups following a block randomization with sealed envelopes. This study is open-label: patients, investigators.

Allocation concealment The nature of the treatment precludes blinding of the surgeon administering the intervention. However, allocating, monitoring and measurement of all primary and secondary endpoints will be made by a dedicated investigator without the knowledge of, or reference to, the treatment allocation (electrocautery or Transcollation technology).

A dedicated investigator will provide a series of sealed envelopes, each containing a randomized treatment allocation. The operating surgeon will ascertain the treatment allocation for each eligible patient by opening the next available sealed randomization envelope. For each patient, the opened envelope will be attached to the Case Report Form for statistical analysis.

Sample Size Group sample sizes of 77 and 77 achieve 90% power to detect a difference of 65,0 ml of chest drain fluid at 24 h between the null hypothesis that both group means of chest drain fluid are 425,0 ml and the alternative hypothesis that the mean of group 2 is 360,0 ml with known group standard deviations of 124,0 ml, with a significance level (alpha) of 0,05 using a two-sided two-sample t-test. We consider a 10% of drop-out then we will recruit 170 patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

170

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • To be considered for enrollment, patients must:

    • be aged ≥ 18 years (of either gender)
    • have provided written informed consent prior to participation in the study
    • undergoing to major lung surgery with an open approach.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • To be considered for enrollment, patients must not:

    • rethoracotomy
    • presence of pleural adhesions
    • coagulitive disorders or disease
    • have a known immune system disorder or immunodeficiency
    • be a participant in another interventional clinical trial or have received another investigational device or device within the last 30 days (donation of excised tissue [lung or parts of lymph nodes] for biological research may occur in the same patients)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Transcollation technology
the use of transcollation technology for hilium dissection during Lung surgery
The use transcollation technology for dissection during lung surgery
Active Comparator: Traditional Electrocautery
The use of electrocautery for hilium dissection during lung surgery
The use of traditional Electrocautery for dissection during Lung Surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood Loss, Milliliters (mL)
Time Frame: 24 hrs
The mean quantity of chest drain fluids at 24 hours of patients in the Transcollation technology (TT) group compared with electrocautery group.
24 hrs

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood loss (g/dl)
Time Frame: 24 hrs
hemoglobin level in the blood compared to the pre-operative level
24 hrs

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 7 days
Length of hospital stay (days), chest Drain duration and Heamoglobin variation of patients in the Transcollation technology (TT) group compared with electrocautery (EC) group.
7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Erino A Rendina, Professor, University of Roma La Sapienza

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

December 16, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 16, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • V1/2015

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Blood Loss, Surgical

Clinical Trials on Transcollation technology

3
Subscribe