Does MiECC Improve Outcome in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Bypass Grafting?

February 7, 2017 updated by: PD Dr. Hausmann, Herzzentrum Coswig

Does Minimal Extracorporeal Circulation Improve Outcome in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Bypass Grafting?

The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate MECC compared with conventional extracorporeal circulation of diabetic patients undergoing elective coronary revascularization procedures. The investigators focused on the effects of extracorporeal circulation especially the renal function between both groups.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is known having a negative influence referring to systemic inflammatory reaction after cardiac surgery which can cause acute kidney injury (AKI). Miniaturized extracorporeal circulation (MECC) attempts to reduce the adverse effects of conventional extracorporeal circulation bypass. Finally, AKI after CPB is a significant clinical problem that increasingly complicates the course of hospitalization and clinical outcome.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

104

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diabetes mellitus type 2
  • isolated elective coronary revascularization

Exclusion Criteria:

  • urgent or emergent Status
  • Re-Operation
  • preexisting reanimation
  • preexisting renal transplantation
  • chronic kidney insufficiency (GFR < 30 ml/min)
  • renal cell carcinoma
  • renal artery Stenosis
  • heart valve disease (middle- and high-grade)
  • endocarditis
  • infections (HIV, Tbc and all types of Hepatitis)
  • hepatic cirrhosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: MiECC

Coronary artery bypass grafting is used with the help of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The technique used in this arm based on the minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation system (MiECC). MiECC has been developed based on the concept of a closed total CPB circuit. The basic elements are a centrifugal pump, a membrane oxygenator and an arterial filter. The priming volume compared to CECC could be reduced. The complete circuit is heparin-coated for maximizing the biocompatibility.

CPB was performed under normothermic conditions of 36°C. Retrograde autologous priming was performed for all patients with stable hemodynamic circulation.

Minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) is an extracorporeal circulation systems used for cardiopulmonary bypass.
Active Comparator: CECC

Coronary artery bypass grafting is used with the help of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The technique used in this arm based on the conventional extracorporeal circulation system (CECC). The CECC is an opened circulation system. The basic elements are a membrane oxygenator, a centrifugal pump, an open perfusion system containing the venous hard shell cardiotomy reservoir and the arterial line filter.

CPB was performed under normothermic conditions of 36°C. Retrograde autologous priming was performed for all patients with stable hemodynamic circulation, leading to a reduction of the priming volume. The CECC flow was set as required in order to maintain a mean arterial pressure (MAP) between 50 and 75 mmHg.

Conventional extracorporeal circulation (CECC) is an extracorporeal circulation system used for cardiopulmonary bypass.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Acute Kidney Injury
Time Frame: within the first 30 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery
within the first 30 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

February 3, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Rölig Studie

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe