Operational Assessment of Point-of-Care Diagnostics in Primary Healthcare Clinics

February 22, 2016 updated by: Tivani Mashamba-Thompson, University of KwaZulu

Evaluating the Accessibility and Utility of HIV-related Point of Care Diagnostic for Maternal Health in Rural South Africa

Diagnostic point-of-care (POC) tests are being rapidly developed and implemented in resource-limited settings. There has been a rapid rise of HIV and TB POC tests in South Africa during the last 10-15 years. The investigators sought to determine the existing availability, current usage and future need of POC tests among rural primary healthcare (PHC) clinics in South Africa's KwaZulu-Natal Province.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Several new diagnostics generation devices are specifically designed to assist clinical staff replacing the equivalent laboratory tests and allowing a wide range of disease diagnoses to be performed immediately at the POC. The clinical impact of POC diagnostics has been shown in a variety of diseases conditions, particularly HIV/AIDS and TB. The World Health Organisation (WHO) called for new clinical diagnostics methods that are designed to function in setting with limited access to laboratory services. Thus, leading to an increase in marketing, manufacturing and development of POC diagnostics instruments and reagents for use in clinical POC. The advent of POC tests in South Africa has led to an improved control of infectious diseases such as HIV and mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB), in this era of drug-resistance. Increased availability of POC test in rural and resource-limited settings is encouraged.

To maximize the impact of novel diagnostics on patient outcomes in resource-limited settings, the implementation of new diagnostics must be performed within a given context and culture. However, the population-level of diagnostic utility in South Africa is not known. The investigators aim to estimate the level of POC diagnostic availability, usage and need in rural South Africa, using a cross sectional survey of rural primary healthcare (PHC) clinics in KwaZulu Natal (KZN). The survey focused on the conditions for which the respondent considered a POC test might help improve their clinical decision making during patient care. Determining the current accessibility, availability, usage and need for POC diagnostics in rural and resource limited settings can help inform developers and implementers of POC diagnostic services on context-specific deployment and implementation of POC diagnostics to address the unmet needs of patients in these settings.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

309

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • KwaZulu Natal
      • Durban, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa, 4001
        • University of KwaZulu Natal

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Rural Primary Healthcare clinics

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary Healthcare clinics located in rural and semi-rural settings

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary Healthcare clinics located in urban settings

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Primary Health care clinics
A survey of 100 primary Health care clinics was carried out
Pregnant and breast feeding women
208 patients were recruited from nine clinics that participated in the survey for evaluation of the accuracy of results produced by the HIV rapid test.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accessibility and availability
Time Frame: Three months
The accessibility and availability of point-of-care diagnostics for maternal health patients in rural primary healthcare clinics
Three months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Usage
Time Frame: Three months
The utility of point-of-care diagnostics for maternal health patients in rural South Africa
Three months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tivani P Mashamba-Thompson, Masters, University of KwaZulu
  • Study Director: Benn K Sartorius, PhD, University of KwaZulu
  • Study Director: Paul K Drain, MD,MPH, University of Washington

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

February 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 26, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BE484/14
  • HRKM 40/15 (Other Identifier: KwaZulu Natal Department of Health)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV

3
Subscribe