The Evaluation of the METS™ Proximal Humeral System

October 18, 2018 updated by: Stryker Orthopaedics

Post Marketing Clinical Follow Up for the Evaluation of the METS™ Proximal Humeral System Using Retrospective Data

This study is a single centre, non-randomised, post market clinical follow up examining retrospective patient data from a series of surgical cases; which involved the endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus using the Stanmore Implant Worldwide METS (Modular Endoprosthetic Tumour System) Proximal Humeral system.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the retrospective patient data where patients have been followed up for at least 12 months post operation; to demonstrate the safety of the METS Proximal Humeral replacement system.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The METS™ Proximal Humeral system is an endoprosthetic replacement designed to restore the length and the function of an arm after the resection of a significant amount of bone tissue; due to a malignant tumour in the proximal humerus. This Post Market Clinical Follow up (PMCF) study is designed to further support the existing evidence that the system is safe and performs as expected, when analysing retrospective patient data that have had a METS™ Proximal Humeral replacement. The target population is male or female subjects aged between 18 years and over who have been implanted with a METS™ Proximal Humeral system at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore; and the patient has been followed up for at least 12 months following implantation.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Stanmore, United Kingdom, HA7 4LP
        • Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Male or female subjects aged between 18 years and over who have been implanted with a METS™ Proximal Humeral system at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore; and the patient has been followed up for at least 12 months following implantation

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient aged 18 and over who has been implanted with a METS™ Proximal Humeral system implant at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore.
  2. Patient has been followed up for at least 12 months following implant surgery
  3. Patient had their surgery on or after January 2007

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is currently or has been involved in pending litigation or worker's compensation
  2. Patient has participated in another clinical investigation or study with an investigational medical device within the last 60 days

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
METS Proximal Humeral system
Implanted with METS Proximal Humerus

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety Evaluation of adverse events that occurred within 12 months post implantation
Time Frame: Follow Up of 12 months
Adverse events within the first 12 months will be assessed and evaluated
Follow Up of 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: William JS Aston, MBBSMRCSFRCS, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

May 17, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 16-02

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

This is a retrospective safety evaluation study. Data will already be deidentified before the clinical research team receive it.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Complications; Arthroplasty

3
Subscribe