Testing the Effectiveness of Integrating Relationship Education Into an Existing Workforce Readiness Program

March 31, 2021 updated by: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
The project will test the strategy of integrating 25 hours of relationship education into an existing employment program for low-income individuals ages 18-30. It will use a 2-arm randomized controlled trial to test the effect of this full package of services on participants' employment outcomes and relationship outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study will examine the programming by FWCA, which currently offers the Career Pathways Bridge program in three locations in St. Louis County in Missouri. The evaluation will test the strategy of integrating relationship education into an existing workforce readiness program. FWCA plans to add approximately 17 hours of content from the Within My Reach relationship education curriculum to the two-week job readiness workshop it offers as part of the Career Pathways Bridge program. Second, FWCA will add up to eight additional one-hour relationship skills education sessions that customers can attend in the five weeks after completing the initial two-week job readiness workshop.

The evaluation will use a 2-arm randomized controlled trial to test the effect of this full package of services on participants' employment outcomes and relationship outcomes. The target population will be low-income individuals ages 18-30 living in St. Louis County, Missouri. The study will aim to enroll 1000 individuals over 2 years. The Metropolitan Employment and Training (MET) Center will be the primary recruitment and service location.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

909

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63133
        • FWCA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 30 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • disconnected from workforce

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Employment Services only
'Workforce Readiness Program'. job readiness workshop, organized into ten daily sessions over two weeks. The main content of these sessions will be a program-developed workforce readiness training, developed with funding from a DOL Career Pathways Bridge grant.
job readiness workshops, organized into ten daily sessions over two weeks.
EXPERIMENTAL: Employment Services with HMRE content
'Workforce Readiness Program supplemented with Relationship Education': job readiness workshop, organized into ten daily sessions over two weeks. Program will add approximately 17 hours of content from the Within My Reach relationship education curriculum to the two-week job readiness workshop - and add up to eight additional one-hour relationship skills education sessions that customers can attend in the five weeks after completing the initial two-week job readiness workshop
job readiness workshops, organized into ten daily sessions over two weeks.
25-hours of "Within My Reach" curriculum and relationship skills education sessions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived romantic relationship skills
Time Frame: 1 year after random assignment
Six-item scale (α = 0.84) equal to the average level of agreement-from "strongly disagree" (= 1) to "strongly agree" (= 4)-with 6 statements.
1 year after random assignment
Perceived conflict management skills
Time Frame: 1 year after random assignment
Five-item scale (α = 0.77) equal to the average self-assessment-from "I am bad at this" (= 1) to "I am extremely good at this" (= 4)-of 5 skills.
1 year after random assignment
Support for going slow in romantic relationships
Time Frame: 1 year after random assignment
Single-item scale equal to the level of agreement-from "strongly disagree" (= 1) to "strongly agree" (= 4)-with the following statement: "People are more likely to succeed in their relationships if they take things slowly."
1 year after random assignment
Disapproval of couple violence
Time Frame: 1 year after random assignment
Five-item scale (α = 0.77) equal to the average level of disagreement-from "strongly agree" (= 1) to "strongly disagree" (= 4)-with 5 statements.
1 year after random assignment
Any exposure to psychological abuse
Time Frame: 1 year after random assignment

Binary variable equal to 1 if the respondent indicates that a romantic partner has done any of the following in the past year:

  • Try to keep you from seeing or talking with your friends
  • Make you feel stupid
  • Keep money from you or take your money without asking
  • Made you feel afraid that they might hurt you
1 year after random assignment
Any exposure to physical abuse
Time Frame: 1 year after random assignment

Binary variable equal to 1 if the respondent indicates that a romantic partner has done any of the following in the past year:

  • Push, shove, or slap you
  • Punch or kick you or beat you up
1 year after random assignment
Any perpetration of physical abuse
Time Frame: 1 year after random assignment

Binary variable equal to 1 if the respondent indicates that they did any of the following to a romantic partner in the past year:

  • Pushed, shoved, or slapped them
  • Punched, kicked, or beat them up
1 year after random assignment
Involved in an unsteady relationship
Time Frame: 1 year after random assignment
Binary variable equal to 1 if the respondent reports being involved in an on-again/off-again relationship at the time of the follow-up survey and equal to 0 if the respondent reports being married, engaged, romantically involved on a steady basis, or not in a romantic relationship at the time of the follow-up survey.
1 year after random assignment
Had an unintended pregnancy
Time Frame: 1 year after random assignment
Binary variable equal to 1 if the respondent reports that they had been/gotten someone pregnant since study enrollment and that they did not want to be/get someone pregnant or the pregnancy came sooner than intended.
1 year after random assignment
Employed or training to improve job prospects
Time Frame: 1 year after random assignment
Binary variable equal to 1 if the respondent was employed, participating in a job training program, or enrolled in school at the time of the follow-up survey.
1 year after random assignment
Monthly earnings, administrative records
Time Frame: 1 year after random assignment
Continuous variable constructed from NDNH data that is created by summing quarterly earnings across the four quarters following random assignment and dividing by 12.
1 year after random assignment
Monthly earnings, survey report
Time Frame: 1 year after random assignment
Continuous variable constructed from survey data that is based on average monthly earnings from all jobs in the first year following study enrollment.
1 year after random assignment
Better off financially now
Time Frame: 1 year after random assignment
Binary variable equal to 1 if the respondent feels better off financially now than a year ago.
1 year after random assignment
Economic hardship
Time Frame: 1 year after random assignment
Continuous variable that represents how many of the following six economic hardships the respondent experienced since study enrollment
1 year after random assignment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 8, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 12, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MPR-500098-FWCA

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Family Relations

Clinical Trials on Workforce Readiness Program

Subscribe