- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02843685
Regression Discontinuity Design to Evaluate of Drotrecogin Alpha Effectiveness
Regression Discontinuity Designs to Evaluate Real-world Effectiveness: a Case Study of Drotrecogin Alpha
Many health care interventions and medications found to have benefits ("efficacy") in experimental, tightly-controlled, human research trials are later found to lack real-world health benefits ("effectiveness"). Inadequate surveillance of real-world clinical effectiveness may falsely reassure clinicians and those who monitor healthcare quality, propagating unrecognized ineffective or harmful treatments at high costs to patients and society. The failure to translate potential health benefits into realized gains, or to detect unexpected harms in healthcare delivery, stems from a lack of methods with which to robustly measure real-world (in)effectiveness. Current methods to detect changes in outcomes 'before and after' implementation may be biased by secular trends in healthcare practice and outcomes; other methods to compare outcomes for treated and untreated patients may be biased by unmeasured factors.
The current project aims to develop and demonstrate - as a proof-of-concept - the use of a quasi-experimental research method called 'regression discontinuity design (RDD)' in surveillance of real-world clinical effectiveness. RDD had previously found use in the evaluation of educational programs in which students scoring below a threshold were assigned an intervention. The US Department of Education considers RDD designs to have quality similar to randomized trials.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Many health care interventions and medications found to have benefits ("efficacy") in experimental, tightly-controlled, human research trials are later found to lack real-world health benefits ("effectiveness"). Inadequate surveillance of real-world clinical effectiveness may falsely reassure clinicians and those who monitor healthcare quality, propagating unrecognized ineffective or harmful treatments at high costs to patients and society. The failure to translate potential health benefits into realized gains, or to detect unexpected harms in healthcare delivery, stems from a lack of methods with which to robustly measure real-world (in)effectiveness. Current methods to detect changes in outcomes 'before and after' implementation may be biased by secular trends in healthcare practice and outcomes; other methods to compare outcomes for treated and untreated patients may be biased by unmeasured factors.
The current project aims to develop and demonstrate - as a proof-of-concept - the use of a quasi-experimental research method called 'regression discontinuity design (RDD)' in surveillance of real-world clinical effectiveness. RDD had previously found use in the evaluation of educational programs in which students scoring below a threshold were assigned an intervention. The US Department of Education considers RDD designs to have quality similar to randomized trials. However, RDD has not been rigorously evaluated in the context of evaluating clinical effectiveness. RDD can be used whenever an intervention is given to patients scoring above a threshold on a continuous biomarker or risk score. This scenario often arises in clinical practice, in which thresholds are used to identify and treat 'high risk' patients. In RDD, outcomes are compared for patients just above and just below the threshold, who are similar, but receive different treatments.
The project will study the use of RDD in evaluating the real-world effectiveness of drotrecogin alpha, a medication that was recommended by the FDA to be given to critically ill patients with severe sepsis at high risk for mortality (APACHE score > 25). Drotrecogin alpha was shown to potentially have "effectiveness" using traditional methods of real-world research, but was eventually shown to not be clinically efficacious in subsequent large randomized trials. The present proposal is a 'proof-of-concept' study that will allow evaluation of effect estimates derived from RDD methods to those of gold standard, pooled randomized trial results. The demonstration of feasibility for a new research method, such as RDD, to evaluate real-world clinical effectiveness would be a major leap forward in the ability monitor for potential real world benefits and harms of new treatments.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
- Boston Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
An International Observational Study Among Severe Sepsis Patients Treated in the Intensive Care Unit (PROGRESS severe sepsis registry).
The PROGRESS registry of severe sepsis cases is a unique resource that contains data linking APACHE scores, drotrecogin alpha administration, and hospital mortality outcomes, providing an opportunity to study RDD as a novel method of comparative effectiveness research, and compare results derived from RDD to prior studies using more traditional comparative effectiveness designs (i.e., propensity score adjustment).
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Included in PROGRESS severe sepsis registry
Exclusion Criteria:
- None
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Relative risk reduction for mortality
Time Frame: Duration of hospitalization, on average approximately 14 days
|
The study will evaluate the change in the relationship between APACHE II scores and hospital mortality rate at the APACHE II threshold score of 25
|
Duration of hospitalization, on average approximately 14 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
APACHE II scores at which drotrecogin alpha was used
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Evaluation of drotrecogin alpha practice patterns at APACHE II score of 25
|
Baseline
|
Change in mortality risk over time
Time Frame: 3 years
|
The study will assess interaction between year and relative risk for mortality associated with drotrecogin alpha
|
3 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Martin G, Brunkhorst FM, Janes JM, Reinhart K, Sundin DP, Garnett K, Beale R. The international PROGRESS registry of patients with severe sepsis: drotrecogin alfa (activated) use and patient outcomes. Crit Care. 2009;13(3):R103. doi: 10.1186/cc7936. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
- Beale R, Reinhart K, Brunkhorst FM, Dobb G, Levy M, Martin G, Martin C, Ramsey G, Silva E, Vallet B, Vincent JL, Janes JM, Sarwat S, Williams MD; PROGRESS Advisory Board. Promoting Global Research Excellence in Severe Sepsis (PROGRESS): lessons from an international sepsis registry. Infection. 2009 Jun;37(3):222-32. doi: 10.1007/s15010-008-8203-z. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
- Walkey AJ, Bor J. Risk-based Heterogeneity of Treatment Effect in Trials and Implications for Surveillance of Clinical Effectiveness Using Regression Discontinuity Designs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Dec 1;192(11):1399. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201508-1533LE. No abstract available.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- H-35010
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Sepsis
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterUniversity of KansasRecruitingSepsis | Septic Shock | Sepsis Syndrome | Sepsis, Severe | Sepsis Bacterial | Sepsis BacteremiaUnited States
-
Jip GroenInBiomeRecruitingMicrobial Colonization | Neonatal Infection | Neonatal Sepsis, Early-Onset | Microbial Disease | Clinical Sepsis | Culture Negative Neonatal Sepsis | Neonatal Sepsis, Late-Onset | Culture Positive Neonatal SepsisNetherlands
-
The University of QueenslandRoyal Brisbane and Women's HospitalUnknown
-
Karolinska InstitutetÖrebro University, SwedenCompletedSepsis | Sepsis Syndrome | Sepsis, SevereSweden
-
Ohio State UniversityCompletedSepsis, Severe Sepsis and Septic ShockUnited States
-
Indonesia UniversityCompletedSevere Sepsis With Septic Shock | Severe Sepsis Without Septic ShockIndonesia
-
University of LeicesterUniversity Hospitals, Leicester; The Royal College of AnaesthetistsCompletedSepsis | Septic Shock | Severe Sepsis | Sepsis SyndromeUnited Kingdom
-
Beckman Coulter, Inc.Biomedical Advanced Research and Development AuthorityRecruitingSevere Sepsis | Severe Sepsis Without Septic ShockUnited States
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); New York Presbyterian Hospital and other collaboratorsCompletedSepsis | Septic Shock | Severe Sepsis | Infection | Sepsis SyndromeUnited States
-
Inverness Medical InnovationsCompletedSepsis | Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome | Severe Sepsis | Sepsis SyndromeUnited States
Clinical Trials on Drotrecogin alfa activated
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyCompleted
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyCompletedSepsisUnited States, Canada, Brazil, Mexico, Australia, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Spain, Austria, Belgium, Chile, Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, India, Italy, Lebanon, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Romania, Russian Federation, Saudi... and more
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyCompletedSepsis | Septic ShockUnited States
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyCompletedSepsis | Hematologic Neoplasms | Infection | Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationUnited States
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyCompletedSepsisUnited States, United Kingdom, France, Slovakia, Switzerland, Australia, Poland, Italy, Chile, Germany, Mexico
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyCompletedSepsisItaly, United Kingdom, United States, Germany, Spain, Belgium, France, Australia, Czech Republic, Netherlands, Canada, Mexico, New Zealand, Finland, Portugal, Brazil, India, Switzerland
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyCompletedSepsis | HypotensionFrance, United States
-
George Washington UniversityEli Lilly and CompanyCompletedEnd Stage Renal DiseaseUnited States
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyCompletedSevere SepsisUnited States, Belgium, Spain, France, Finland, Germany, Canada, United Kingdom, Puerto Rico
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyCompletedSepsisCanada, Finland, Belgium, Argentina, Chile, Australia, Austria, Brazil, Czech Republic, Denmark, Egypt, France