Health Improvement Project - Providence (HIP)

December 23, 2019 updated by: Michael P. Carey, The Miriam Hospital

Mindfulness Training to Improve ART Adherence and Reduce Risk Behavior Among Persons Living With HIV

This study will investigate whether phone-delivered mindfulness training is feasible and acceptable for persons living with HIV and whether it may help them improve adherence to medications and reduce risky sexual behaviors.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Two-thirds of people living with HIV show sub-optimal adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) and one-third engages in risky sex. Both non-adherence and risky sex have been associated with emotional distress and impulsivity. In this trial, the investigators will examine the utility of phone-delivered mindfulness training (MT) for people living with HIV. The primary outcomes comprise feasibility and acceptability of phone-delivery; secondary outcomes are estimates of efficacy of MT on adherence to ART and safer sexual practices as well as on their hypothesized antecedents.

Fifty participants will be enrolled in this parallel-group randomized clinical trial (RCT). Outpatients recruited from an HIV treatment clinic will be randomized (1:1 ratio) to either MT or to health coaching intervention; both interventions will be administered during 8 weekly phone calls. ART adherence (self-reported measure and unannounced phone pill counts), sexual behavior (self-reports and biomarkers), mindfulness, depression, stress, and impulsivity will be measured at baseline, post-intervention, and 3 months post-intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02906
        • The Miriam Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HIV infection
  • Sub-optimal adherence to ART (Less than "always" taking ART medication and/or viral load > 20 copies/mL);
  • Psychological distress (PHQ-4 score ≥ 2);
  • Recent risky sexual behavior (any unprotected sex OR > 1 sexual partner over the past 6 months)
  • Access to a telephone or cell phone

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwilling or unable to provide informed consent
  • Cognitive impairment
  • Non-English speaking
  • Low literacy (i.e., reporting they "often" or "always" need someone to read instructions, pamphlets, or other written material from a doctor or pharmacy to them
  • Enrolled in another behavioral trials
  • Prior formal mindfulness training or have practiced of mindfulness or related mind-body techniques in the previous year
  • Severe hearing impairment not allowing phone delivery
  • Suicidal ideation
  • Planning to move out of the area within the study period
  • Clinic provider advising against recruitment in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mindfulness training (MT)
Eight, 30-minute phone delivered MT sessions once a week for 8 weeks
Participants assigned to the MT condition will receive a phone-delivered 30-minute mindfulness training once a week for 8 weeks. ). In addition to the weekly training session, participants will be instructed to practice mindfulness techniques for 15 minutes daily using a standardized audio recording to guide the participant through the techniques learned with the instructor.
Active Comparator: Health Coaching (HC)
Eight, 30-minute phone delivered HC sessions once a week for 8 weeks
The HC condition will consist of educational modules designed to control for the contact time and attention received in the MT condition. To match the time MT participants will spend doing mindfulness exercises at home, HC participants will be assigned a 15-minute daily activity that is aligned with the HC topics

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of Intervention
Time Frame: post-intervention, 9 to 10 weeks after baseline
Feasibility - as indicated by the number of patients attending at least 50% of sessions
post-intervention, 9 to 10 weeks after baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability of the Intervention
Time Frame: post-intervention, 9 to 10 weeks after baseline
Number of patients reporting "very satisfied" or "mostly satisfied" with their intervention
post-intervention, 9 to 10 weeks after baseline
Antiretroviral Medication Adherence
Time Frame: Baseline; post-intervention, 9 to 10 weeks after baseline; follow-up, 21 to 22 weeks after baseline
Self-reported number of missed days of medication
Baseline; post-intervention, 9 to 10 weeks after baseline; follow-up, 21 to 22 weeks after baseline
Self-reported Sexual Risk Behavior
Time Frame: Baseline; post-intervention, 9 to 10 weeks after baseline; follow-up, 21 to 22 weeks after baseline
Self-reported risky sexual behavior as indicated by the percentage of episodes of condom protected sexual intercourse Higher values are better outcome
Baseline; post-intervention, 9 to 10 weeks after baseline; follow-up, 21 to 22 weeks after baseline
Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline; post-intervention, 9 to 10 weeks after baseline; follow-up, 21 to 22 weeks after baseline
Five Facet of Mindfulness Questionnaire (15 items; short form) Construct = Mindfulness Minimum total scale score = 15 Maximum total scale score = 75 Scoring: sum across all 15 items Higher scores represent a better outcome
Baseline; post-intervention, 9 to 10 weeks after baseline; follow-up, 21 to 22 weeks after baseline
Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: Baseline; post-intervention, 9 to 10 weeks after baseline; follow-up, 21 to 22 weeks after baseline
Perceived Stress Scale (4-item version) Construct = perceived stress Minimum total scale score = 0 Maximum total scale score = 16 Scoring: reverse score items 2 and 3, then sum across all 4 items Higher scores represent a worse outcome
Baseline; post-intervention, 9 to 10 weeks after baseline; follow-up, 21 to 22 weeks after baseline
Barratt Impulsiveness Scale
Time Frame: Baseline; post-intervention, 9 to 10 weeks after baseline; follow-up, 21 to 22 weeks after baseline
Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (short form, 8 items) Construct = Impulsivity Minimum total scale score = 8 Maximum total scale score = 32 Scoring: reverse score items 1, 4, 5, 6, and then sum across all 8 items Higher scores represent a worse outcome
Baseline; post-intervention, 9 to 10 weeks after baseline; follow-up, 21 to 22 weeks after baseline
Patient Health Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline; post-intervention, 9 to 10 weeks after baseline; follow-up, 21 to 22 weeks after baseline
Patient Health Questionnaire (9 item version) Construct measured = depression Minimum total scale score = 0 Maximum total scale score = 27 Scoring: sum across all 9 items Higher scores represent a worse outcome
Baseline; post-intervention, 9 to 10 weeks after baseline; follow-up, 21 to 22 weeks after baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: MIchael P Carey, PhD, Centers for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, The Miriam Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Elena Salmoirago-Blotcher, MD, PhD, Centers for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, The Miriam Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 18, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 1, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R34AT008930 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV

Clinical Trials on Mindfulness Training (MT)

Subscribe