Predictive Value of PIIINP and Urinary NGAL in Renal Function Recovery (PIIINP-NGAL)

September 5, 2016 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

Prospective Multicenter Study to Assess the Predictive Value of PIIINP and Urinary NGAL in Renal Function Recovery During Acute Tubular Necrosis

Acute Renal Failure (ARF) is defined by a severe, and usually reversible, glomerular filtration rate decreasing. Acute Tubular Necrosis (ATN) remain the major cause of ARF involving distress and destruction of tubular cells. This specific typology of ARF may evolve toward Chronic Renal Failure (CRF) concretizing a major public health issue.

Predict the progression of ARF towards CRF appears essential. The investigators believe that the PIIINP and urinary NGAL biomarkers may constitute robust biomarkers of progression risk towards CRF.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Acute Renal Failure (ARF) is defined by a severe, and usually reversible, glomerular filtration rate decreasing. Beside its frequency, ARF may be associated with severe prognostic. Thus, patient admitted in ICU and suffering of ARF requiring dialysis, had a higher risk of mortality up to 50%.

Tubulointerstitial nephropathies, particularly Acute Tubular Necrosis (ATN) remain the major cause of ARF, representing 45-50% of cases. The ATN is due to suffering and destruction of tubular cells which are very sensitive to ischemia-reperfusion lesions because tubular reabsorption functions require significant and constant energy intake. However, ATN represents a relatively homogeneous group in terms of acute kidney disease typology. Homogeneity and significant frequency compels ATN as an optimal model to study function recovery after ARF.

ARF constitutes a major public health issue. Actually, incidence of Chronic Renal Failure (CRF) after an ARF, due to ATN, is estimated between 19% and 31%. In addition 12.5% of patients with specific ARF presentation immediately reach End-stage Renal Disease (ESRD), and the occurrence of ARF requiring dialysis, triples the risk of chronic renal support.

Therefore, predict the progression of ARF towards CRF appears essential.

At this time, the investigators currently lack of reliable biomarkers to predict such progression. This pejorative kidney development is due to the persistence of intrarenal inflammation, rapid development of interstitial fibrosis and deficiency in tubular restoration. It involves complex mechanisms of inflammatory response, and vascular and tubular remodeling.

Two promising biomarkers of renal fibrosis, ARF occurrence and CRF progression risk appear in recent years: the Procollagen III N-terminal peptide (PIIINP) and the neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL). The investigators believe that the PIIINP and urinary NGAL may constitute robust biomarkers of progression (or not) towards CRF in ARF context. Firstly, PIIINP is a good reflection of fibrosis process inside the kidney. Secondarily, NGAL is a marker of renal tubule remodeling after renal aggression. The combination of these two biomarkers could therefore efficiently reflect the balance tubular fibrosis/restoration and may allow optimal prediction of renal function recovery.

The investigators hypothesize that these two biomarkers may be used to assess the risk of CRF progression during ARF in ATN context.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

287

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients experimenting ARF in ATN context.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • off-age patient.
  • ATN diagnosis based on 1) typical clinical environment (sepsis, nephrotoxicity...) 2) 50% decrease of glomerular filtration flow (according clearance MDRD) or more than 100micromol plasmatic creatinine increase. 3) no renal function improvement after efficient vascular filling (>750cc normal saline or equivalent).
  • Consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ARF not related with ATN context.
  • Life expectancy less than 3 months.
  • Protocol refusal

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PIIINP/Urinary Creatinine ratio levels between patients experimenting CRF or not.
Time Frame: 12months after initial diagnosis.
We expect to highlight different ratio PIIINP/Urinary Creatinine levels and evolution between patients experimenting CRF or not (defined less than 60 mL/min according MDRD formula).
12months after initial diagnosis.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NGAL/Urinary Creatinine ratio levels between patients experimenting CRF or not.
Time Frame: 12, 18 and 24 months after initial diagnosis.
We expect to highlight different ratio NGAL/Urinary Creatinine levels and evolution between patients experimenting CRF or not (defined less than 60 mL/min according MDRD formula).
12, 18 and 24 months after initial diagnosis.
Correlation between NGAL/Urinary Creatinine and PIIINP/Urinary Creatinine ratios among patients with ARF.
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12, 18 or 24 months after initial diagnosis.
We expect to highlight linear correlation between NGAL/Urinary Creatinine and PIIINP/Urinary Creatinine ratios among patients with ARF.
3, 6, 12, 18 or 24 months after initial diagnosis.
Validation of high diagnostic performance of NGAL/Urinary Creatinine ratio to predict CRF occurrence.
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12, 18 or 24 months after initial diagnosis.
Sensitivity of NGAL/Urinary Creatinine ratio will be assessed at each time frame.
3, 6, 12, 18 or 24 months after initial diagnosis.
Validation of high diagnostic performance of PIIINP/Urinary Creatinine to predict CRF occurrence.
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12, 18 or 24 months after initial diagnosis.
Sensitivity of PIIINP/Urinary Creatinine ratio will be assessed at each time frame.
3, 6, 12, 18 or 24 months after initial diagnosis.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 5, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 7, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Renal Failure

3
Subscribe