Mental Practice Combined With Physical Practice to Improve the Gait Performance of People With Parkinson's Disease

September 17, 2018 updated by: University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Among the impairments associated to Parkinson's disease, gait disturbance is one of which that has the most negative impact on the independence in daily living activities and quality of life of people living with Parkinson's disease. Despite the considerable amount of research, we have no consensus about the most efficient physiotherapeutic approach to improve the gait disturbance. Mental practice is considered an efficient strategy to improve the motor performance in healthy individuals and people with stroke. However, there is scarce evidence about its therapeutic results to improve the gait performance in people living with Parkinson's disease. Thus, the aim of this study is to investigate the effects of gait mental practice associated to physical practice to improve the gait performance in people living with Parkinson's disease.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Among the impairments associated to Parkinson's disease, the gait disturbance is one of which that has the most negative impact on the independence in daily living activities and quality of life of people living with Parkinson's disease. Despite the considerable amount of research, we have no consensus about the most efficient physiotherapeutic approach to improve the gait disturbance. Mental practice is considered an efficient strategy to improve the motor performance in healthy individuals and people with stroke. However, there is scarce evidence about its therapeutic results to improve the gait performance in people living with Parkinson's disease.

Objectives: To investigate the effects of mental gait practice associated with physical practice to improve the gait performance of people living with Parkinson's disease.

Design: Parallel, prospective, double-blind, multicentre randomized clinical trial.

Setting: Brazilian Parkinson Association.

Participants: Twenty-two people living with Parkinson's disease in stages 2-3 of disease evolution according to Hoehn and Yahr Classification.

Interventions: The participants will be randomly allocated in an experimental group and a control group. Both groups will perform 10 individual training sessions, two times per week, for five weeks. The training sessions consist of four blocks of mental practice intercalated with four blocks of physical practice of gait under different conditions. The only difference between the groups will be the content of mental practice blocks: the experimental group will perform mental practice of gait while the control group performs non-gait mental practice.

Randomization: Participants will be randomized by ClinStat software into one of two groups: Experimental Group (EG), which will perform gait mental practice; and Control Group (CG), which will perform the non-gait mental practice.

Statistical analysis: The training effects for each primary and secondary outcome measure will be analyzed for the two training conditions (i.e., control and experimental) at the four assessment time points (i.e., pre-intervention, 7 days post-completion and at 30 and 60-day follow-up) using a mixed-design ANOVA with training as the between-group factor and the assessment time point as the within-group factor. The effect sizes (ES) will be calculated for all comparisons at alpha = 0.05. A Tukey HSD post-hoc test will be used for multiple comparisons and p-values below 5 % will be considered as statistically significant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • São Paulo, Brazil, 04142-092
        • Brazil Parkinson Association

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 80 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of Parkinson's disease according to the United Kingdom Brain Bank criteria;
  • in stage 2-3 of the disease evolution according to the Hoehn and Yahr;
  • treated with levodopa or its synergists;
  • capable to walk independently indoors without aid;
  • referring 5 years of education or more.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of other neurological (excluding PD), orthopedic or cardiopulmonary problems;
  • visual and auditory deficiency uncorrected;
  • dementia [assessed by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), cut-off 26];
  • depression [according to the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15), cut-off 6];
  • declined imagery capacity [according to the Revised Movement Imagery Questionnaire (MIQ-R) cut-off 10].

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental Group (EG)
The Experimental training (ET) consists of 10 sessions with 4 blocks of MP (GMP) intercalated with 4 blocks of gait physical practice (GPP), under single (ST) and dual-task (DT) conditions.

Each block of MP consists of 5 mental walking attempts with 10 imagined steps. Participants, seated comfortably, eyes closed, will be asked to imagine themselves walking as of a first-person perspective, without any overt physical movement, in four different conditions: habitual speed, as fast as possible, overcoming obstacles and memorizing a name of a specific medication.

Each block of PP consists of 5 physical walking attempts, with 10 steps. Participants will be asked to walk in 4 different conditions: habitual speed,as fast as possible, overcoming obstacles and memorizing a name of a specific medication.

Active Comparator: Control Group
The Control training (CT) consists of 10 sessions with 4 blocks of MP (nGMP) intercalated with 4 blocks of gait physical practice (GPP), under single (ST) and dual-task (DT) conditions.

Each block of MP consists of 5 mental walking attempts with 10 imagined steps. Participants, seated comfortably, eyes closed, will be asked to imagine themselves seated appreciating a beautiful landscape as of a first-person perspective, without any overt physical movement, in four different contexts: in a carriage, in a hot air balloon, in a boat and in a zepelin.

Each block of PP consists of 5 physical walking attempts, with 10 steps. Participants will be asked to walk in 4 different conditions: habitual speed,as fast as possible, overcoming obstacles and memorizing a name of a specific medication.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Six-minute Walk Test
Time Frame: up to 3 months
The six-minute walk test (6-MWT) is a timed recommended clinically based test in which participants are asked to walk for 6 minutes, in their habitual speed, as much distance as possible. Interruptions for resting are permitted if necessary. The 6-MWT has demonstrated adequate test-retest and interrater reliability and minimal detectable change of 82 meters in PD. It may be a good predictor of the ability to independently walk outside safely.
up to 3 months
Postural Instability and Gait Difficulty Score
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Postural Instability and Gait Difficulty Score (PIGD): This recommended rating scale for evaluation of gait alterations in PD is based on 5 Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) items relevant to gait and postural instability (items 13-15, 29, and 30). The 13-15 items are based on gait performance according to PPD perspective, while 29 and 30 items are based on the motor test. It is a recent rating scale that has been used in PD, evaluated independently, which has adequate clinimetric characteristics.
up to 3 months
Dynamic Gait Index
Time Frame: up tp 3 months
The balance during the eight gait related activities is scored in this test. These include quality of walking speed change, going around and over obstacles and stair walking, as well as the number of steps required for a pivot turn.
up tp 3 months
30-second dual task gait
Time Frame: up tp 3 months
It measures the maximal walking distance reached in 30 seconds under single task, i.e., without another concurrent task, and dual task, i.e., with a concurrent cognitive task. The cognitive task consists of speaking as many words as possible, starting with a specific character (F, S or A), presented at the beginning of test.
up tp 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trail Making Test
Time Frame: up to 3 months
This test is constituted with two-timed parts: Part A, which involves a visual-scanning task where the participant is required to draw lines sequentially connecting consecutively numbered circles (1-25) randomly arranged on a page as fast as possible. Part B, which assesses cognitive flexibility, where the participant is asked to connect the same number of circles in an alternating sequence of numbers and letters (1, A, 2, B, etc.).
up to 3 months
39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire
Time Frame: up to 3 months
This scale assesses the health-related quality of life, i.e., the impact of an illness and/or treatment on patients' perception of their status of health and on subjective well-being or satisfaction with life. It evaluates 39 parameters in eight groups of issues (mobility, ADL, emotional well-being, stigma of the disease, back in the next, cognitive, communication and bodily discomfort).
up to 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maria Elisa P Piemonte, PhD, Department of Physioterapy , Communication Science&Disorders, Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 19, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Experimental training

Subscribe