- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02927171
Shifting Rehabilitation Paradigms in Skilled Nursing Facilities
March 20, 2020 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development
This study seeks to improve rehabilitation methods for restoring physical function with skilled nursing facility care.
More specifically, this study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of an intensive therapeutic rehabilitation program for older adult skilled nursing home residents compared to usual care.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
There is growing recognition that acute hospitalization contributes to marked functional decline in older adults.
Nearly 20% of all hospitalized older adults are discharged to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) to address these functional deficits.
However, rehabilitation in SNFs may not adequately restore physical function, which potentially contributes to poor community discharge rates.
Strikingly, only 37% of all patients admitted to SNFs are discharged to a community setting, which suggests a paradigm shift is required to optimize rehabilitation within SNFs.
Currently, usual care rehabilitation in SNFs consists of low-intensity rehabilitation interventions, which are physiologically inadequate to induce meaningful changes in skeletal muscle strength and physical function.
Therefore, the investigators propose a novel "IntenSive Therapeutic Rehabilitation for Older skilled NursinG HomE Residents" (I-STRONGER) program, which integrates principles of physiologic tissue overload into combined strengthening and functional interventions for greater gains in physical function.
The overall goals of this investigation are to 1) demonstrate feasibility of I-STRONGER in SNF settings and 2) determine the effectiveness of I-STRONGER in improving physical function.
A comparison of usual care (UC) with I-STRONGER will occur using a staged, 2 group design (independent cohorts), with a single SNF serving as its own control.
The first cohort of SNF patients will participate in UC (Stage 1) and after therapist training on ISTRONGER is completed, a second cohort of patients entering the same facility will participate in I-STRONGER (Stage 2).
The feasibility of I-STRONGER will be evaluated by patient acceptability and therapist compliance measures.
Sample size estimates (using patients with mobility deficits in home health settings) suggest at least 86 participants are necessary to be adequately powered.
Heterogeneity of the sample will be re-evaluated during the study period using SNF data and sample size estimates may be adjusted as appropriate.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
104
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
- Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO
-
Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
- VA Community Living Center
-
Denver, Colorado, United States, 80247
- Brookdale Senior Living
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults > 18 years of age who are admitted to a skilled nursing facility following hospitalization
- Qualify to receive at least physical therapy services
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with primary diagnoses related to neurological disorders will be excluded as patient needs require more of a motor control approach rather than the proposed high-intensity approach. Such patient populations include:
- Parkinson's Disease
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Recent Cerebral Vascular Accident
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Patients on hospice care will be excluded as the approach is based on palliative principles.
- Other patients to be excluded will include those with conditions where strength training is contraindicated (as indicated by the American College of
Sports Medicine Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription):
- Recent unstable fracture
- Advanced congestive heart failure
- Bone metastasis sites
- Tumors in strengthening target areas
- Acute Illness
- Recent myocardial infarction (within 3-6 weeks)
- Weight bearing restrictions on graft or fracture sites
- Exposed tendon or muscle
- Absence of pedal pulses
- Presence of fistula
- Platelet levels <50,000/ L
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Usual Care
Skilled nursing facility rehabilitation therapists provide all patients with usual standard of care.
|
|
|
Experimental: I-STRONGER
IntenSive Therapeutic Rehabilitation for Older Skilled NursinG HomE Residents (I-STRONGER) Progressive, high-intensity strengthening and functional interventions to facilitate independence with functional activities.
Skilled nursing facility rehabilitation therapists will be trained in I-STRONGER intervention and will implement to all eligible patients as new standard of care.
|
Progressive, high-intensity strengthening and functional interventions to facilitate independence with functional activities.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Time Frame: Change from SNF Admission to SNF Discharge (Expected average length of stay: 21 days)
|
Global measure of lower extremity function, which consists of walking speed, chair stands, and balance tests.
Minimum scores are 0 and maximum scores are 12.
Higher scores indicate better function.
|
Change from SNF Admission to SNF Discharge (Expected average length of stay: 21 days)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Gait Speed
Time Frame: Change from SNF Admission to SNF Discharge (Expected average length of stay: 21 days)
|
Time it takes to walk a 4 meter path.
Lower scores indicate better function.
|
Change from SNF Admission to SNF Discharge (Expected average length of stay: 21 days)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Satisfaction Survey
Time Frame: Quantification at SNF Discharge (Expected average length of stay: 21 days)
|
8 Question survey, scoring each questions on a 1-10 scale (1=not at all, 10=extremely).
Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction.
|
Quantification at SNF Discharge (Expected average length of stay: 21 days)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jennifer E. Stevens-Lapsley, PhD, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Mallinson T, Deutsch A, Bateman J, Tseng HY, Manheim L, Almagor O, Heinemann AW. Comparison of discharge functional status after rehabilitation in skilled nursing, home health, and medical rehabilitation settings for patients after hip fracture repair. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Feb;95(2):209-17. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.05.031. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
- Peterson MJ, Crowley GM, Sullivan RJ, Morey MC. Physical function in sedentary and exercising older veterans as compared to national norms. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004 Sep;41(5):653-8. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2003.09.0141.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
February 28, 2016
Primary Completion (Actual)
October 30, 2018
Study Completion (Actual)
January 1, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 26, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 5, 2016
First Posted (Estimate)
October 6, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 3, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 20, 2020
Last Verified
March 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- E2193-P
- I21RX002193 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.