EIT Assessment of Lung Volume and Tidal Distribution: A Comparison of Non-Invasive Ventilation Devices

May 3, 2019 updated by: Carl Haas, University of Michigan
This study is being done to further the investigators' knowledge of the EIT system and to see if measures between two non-invasive ventilation systems routinely used clinically are equivalent.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Mechanical ventilation is life-saving technology but it can also inadvertently induce lung injury and increase morbidity and mortality. There currently is not an easy method of assessing the impact ventilator settings have on the degree of lung inflation. Computed tomography (CT), the gold standard for visually monitoring lung function, can provide detailed regional information of the lung. Unfortunately, it necessitates moving critically ill patients to a special diagnostic room and involves exposure to radiation like an X-ray.

A technique introduced in the 1980's, electrical impedance tomography (EIT), can non-invasively provide similar monitoring of lung function, and without the exposure to radiation. This imaging technique applies small alternating currents of electricity to surface electrodes to construct cross-sectional images of the lung.

Over that past several decades EIT has moved from the research lab to commercially available devices that are used at the bedside. EIT has also been applied to study the effects of various devices used to provide non-invasive ventilation. EIT may prove useful to optimally adjust non-invasive ventilation settings to improve ventilation and oxygenation. One such EIT system is manufactured by Draeger Medical. It is available in Europe and Canada but is not yet FDA approved for use in the United States.

This study is being done with healthy volunteers to further the investigators' knowledge of the EIT system and to see if measures between two non-invasive ventilation systems routinely used clinically are equivalent.

As this is a preliminary study looking at the EIT system vs 2 other devices, outcomes measures may be modified as the study progresses.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of a cardiac pacemaker, an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or any other active implants

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Respironics V-60, then Draeger V500
Testing by applying noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) via two different bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) devices . Arm one applies the Respironics V-60, then the Drager V-500.
Application of various levels of positive pressure
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Draeger V500, then Respironics V-60
Testing by applying noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) via two different bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) devices . Arm two applies the Drager V-500, then the Respironics V-60.
Application of various levels of positive pressure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Global Tidal Variation (TID)
Time Frame: 1 day
TID is the distribution of ventilation for a breath averaged over a defined section, the entire lung. TID is analogous to the tidal volume. Baseline is defined to be 100% and other measures are in comparison to baseline (eg, a value of 102 represents a 2% increase from baseline).
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Regional Tidal Variation: Dorsal
Time Frame: 1 day
Distribution of ventilation for a breath averaged over a defined section, the dorsal lung regions. Reflects the percent of tidal volume distributed to that area.
1 day
Regional Tidal Variation: Ventral
Time Frame: 1 day
Distribution of ventilation for a breath averaged over a defined section, the ventral lung regions. Reflects the percent of tidal volume distributed to that area.
1 day
Global Change in End-expiratory Lung Impedance (EELI)
Time Frame: 1 day

EELI is the impedance at the end of tidal variation, or end-expiration. EELI reflects the end-expiratory lung volume (EELV); thus an increase in EELI represents and increase in lung volume.

The change in EELI that the electrical impedance tomography (EIT) device (Pulmovista, Drager) provides is the percent difference between the EELI of a given period and the EELI during a baseline or reference period. Positive or negative percent change suggests an increase or decrease in EELI and presumably EELV by a similar percentage. The baseline measurements used here were taken breathing air and no pressures applied, while the other measurements were taken with varying levels of pressure applied.

By definition, baseline is assigned the value of 0%, by the EIT device. While it would be helpful to have the actual numbers for the baseline impedance values, this data was not provided by the EIT device.

1 day
Regional Change in EELI: Dorsal
Time Frame: 1 day

EELI is the impedance at the end of tidal variation, or end-expiration. EELI reflects the end-expiratory lung volume (EELV); thus an increase in EELI represents and increase in lung volume.

The change in EELI that the electrical impedance tomography (EIT) device (Pulmovista, Drager) provides is the percent difference between the EELI of a given period and the EELI during a baseline or reference period. Positive or negative percent change suggests an increase or decrease in EELI and presumably EELV by a similar percentage. The baseline measurements used here were taken breathing air and no pressures applied, while the other measurements were taken with varying levels of pressure applied.

By definition, baseline is assigned the value of 0%, by the EIT device. While it would be helpful to have the actual numbers for the baseline impedance values, this data was not provided by the EIT device

1 day
Regional Change in EELI: Ventral
Time Frame: 1 day

EELI is the impedance at the end of tidal variation, or end-expiration. EELI reflects the end-expiratory lung volume (EELV); thus an increase in EELI represents and increase in lung volume.

The change in EELI that the electrical impedance tomography (EIT) device (Pulmovista, Drager) provides is the percent difference between the EELI of a given period and the EELI during a baseline or reference period. Positive or negative percent change suggests an increase or decrease in EELI and presumably EELV by a similar percentage. The baseline measurements used here were taken breathing air and no pressures applied, while the other measurements were taken with varying levels of pressure applied.

By definition, baseline is assigned the value of 0%, by the EIT device. While it would be helpful to have the actual numbers for the baseline impedance values, this data was not provided by the EIT device

1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carl Haas, MLS, University of Michigan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 27, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 27, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 12, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 14, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HUM00102144

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spontaneous Ventilation

Clinical Trials on noninvasive positive pressure ventilation

3
Subscribe