Treatment of Knee Arthrosis With Platelet-derived Growth Factors vs. Hyaluronic Acid.

November 8, 2016 updated by: Claudio Lisi, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo

Treatment of Knee Arthrosis: Platelet-derived Growth Factors vs. Hyaluronic Acid. A Phase II-III Randomized Controlled Trial

Primary aim of this trial was to assess efficacy three intraarticular injections of platelet lysate when compared to hyaluronic acid. Additional objectives were to compare the treatment groups in terms of a number of functional scales and of number of adverse events.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid are effective in improving symptoms and slow disease progression, but are not able to revert the damage mechanism and trigger cartilage healing.

Growth factors included in PRP could stimulate cartilage repair, normalize synovial fluid viscoelasticity, induce a correction in tissue damage, improve articular function, control pain and ameliorate quality of life.

Primary aim of this trial was to assess, among patients with grade II/III osteoarthrosis of the knee, efficacy (as determined by improvement at MRI 6 months after the first injection) of three intraarticular injections of platelet lysate when compared to hyaluronic acid. Additional objectives were to compare the treatment groups in terms of a number of functional scales (WOMAC, Lysholm, Tegner Knee, Scale, AKS, Lequesne, VAS) and of number of adverse events.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

58

Phase

  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • grade II/III OA of the knee demonstrated at MRI17,18, according to Shahriaree Classification System - modified
  • no previous OA treatment with local hyaluronic acid or steroid injections
  • ife expectancy >1 year
  • no ongoing pregnancy
  • ability to understand and complete clinical and functional scales Lysholm, WOMAC, AKS, VAS
  • written consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Platelet-rich plasma
Patients in the intervention group will receive three autologous PRP plus calcium gluconate (as activator) intraarticular injections at 4-week intervals. Briefly, at the Immunohaematology and Transfusion Service, on each scheduled visit 20 ml of autologous whole blood will be sampled from each patient, 2 ml ACD-A will be added directly the syringe as anticoagulant; finally the vial will be gently centrifuged at 900rpm for 7 minutes. Platelet-rich plasma was collected. The PRP vials plus activator will be immediately shipped to the rehabilitation unit, where intraarticular injection will be performed by an experienced physiatrist.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: hyaluronic acid
Patients in the control group will receive three intraarticular hyaluronic acid (20 mg/2 mL; Hyalgan, Fidia, Abano Terme, Italy) injections at the same intervals, by the same study staff.
intraarticular hyaluronic acid (20 mg/2 mL; Hyalgan, Fidia, Abano Terme, Italy) injections at the same intervals

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy (as determined by improvement at MRI 6 months after the first injection) of intraarticular injections of platelet lysate
Time Frame: Six months after the last infiltration
Each knee was improvement, from baseline, by at least one degree the maximum MRI score (Shahriaree Classification System - modified) at 6 month
Six months after the last infiltration

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
WOMAC functional scale
Time Frame: At baseline (prior to treatment), at 15 days form the last injection, 6 months from the last infiltration and at 1 year
multilevel generalized linear models (for panel-data) with interaction between time and treatment group
At baseline (prior to treatment), at 15 days form the last injection, 6 months from the last infiltration and at 1 year
Lysholm functional scale
Time Frame: At baseline (prior to treatment), at 15 days form the last injection, 6 months from the last infiltration and at 1 year
multilevel generalized linear models (for panel-data) with interaction between time and treatment group
At baseline (prior to treatment), at 15 days form the last injection, 6 months from the last infiltration and at 1 year
Tegner Knee functional scale
Time Frame: At baseline (prior to treatment), at 15 days form the last injection, 6 months from the last infiltration and at 1 year
multilevel generalized linear models (for panel-data) with interaction between time and treatment group
At baseline (prior to treatment), at 15 days form the last injection, 6 months from the last infiltration and at 1 year
AKS functional scale
Time Frame: At baseline (prior to treatment), at 15 days form the last injection, 6 months from the last infiltration and at 1 year
multilevel generalized linear models (for panel-data) with interaction between time and treatment group
At baseline (prior to treatment), at 15 days form the last injection, 6 months from the last infiltration and at 1 year
Lequesne functional scale
Time Frame: At baseline (prior to treatment), at 15 days form the last injection, 6 months from the last infiltration and at 1 year
multilevel generalized linear models (for panel-data) with interaction between time and treatment group
At baseline (prior to treatment), at 15 days form the last injection, 6 months from the last infiltration and at 1 year
VAS for pain
Time Frame: At baseline (prior to treatment), at 15 days form the last injection, 6 months from the last infiltration and at 1 year
multilevel generalized linear models (for panel-data) with interaction between time and treatment group
At baseline (prior to treatment), at 15 days form the last injection, 6 months from the last infiltration and at 1 year
Adverse event
Time Frame: 1 year
number of patients and knees with adverse event (any); anticipated potential adverse events were infection, anaphylaxis, hematoma
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Claudio Lisi, MD, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 8, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 9, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2016

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe