Evaluation of Tomosynthesis for Characterization and the Management of Breast Lesions (ETOLE)

November 22, 2017 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

EVALUATION DE LA TOMOSYNTHESE DANS LA CARACTERISATION ET LA PRISE EN CHARGE DES LESIONS MAMMAIRES : "ETOLE"

Tomosynthesis is an innovative technique developed in digital mammography for obtaining a sectional image of the breast. Mammography has the main disadvantage of being an imaging projection that creates overlays, which eliminates tomosynthesis.

The objective of this study is to evaluate if the BI-RADS classification obtained by tomosynthesis with synthetic mammography is superior to that obtained by conventional mammography in terms of specificity while not inferior in terms of sensitivity.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

2000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient having clinical or breast imaging abnormalities classified as BiRads 3, 4, 5 (Table 1). (5)
  • Patient over 18 years old
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients at high risk of breast cancer, mutations BRCA 1 (BReast CAncer gene 1) or BRCA 2 (BReast CAncer gene 2) carriers, Li Fraumeni, or history of thoracic radiation will be excluded because of their greater sensitivity to ionizing radiation.
  • Patient unable to give informed consent for physical, mental, or legal reasons.
  • Patient not affiliated with French Social Security Insurance.
  • Patient under treatment for breast cancer.
  • When mammography is not recommended according to good practice by the French Health Authority (HAS).
  • Pregnant patient.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: standard mammography
Standard mammography
Experimental: standard mammography and tomosynthesis
Standard mammography and tomosynthesis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Breast Imaging-Reporting And Data System (BI-RADS) scale
Time Frame: Day 1
The primary evaluation parameter will be the classification error of tumors according to the BiRads scale obtained by mammography (BiRadsM) and by tomosynthesis (BiRadsT) according to the gold standard.
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Criteria for a poor prognosis
Time Frame: Day 1
The visibility (presence or absence) of signs of poor prognosis criteria. We will compare the visibility of poor prognosis criteria seen on mammography + ultrasound and seen on tomosynthesis with synthetic mammography + ultrasound.
Day 1
Number of additional examinations
Time Frame: Day 30
Needs for supplementary breast imaging exams and biopsies
Day 30
The number of ultrasound exams
Time Frame: Day 30
Day 30
Total radiation dose
Time Frame: Day 30
Day 30
Cost of the diagnostic strategies
Time Frame: Day 30
Day 30
Agreement between readers
Time Frame: Day 1
The reproducibility of the interpretation of tomosynthesis will be assessed with differences of classifications BiRadsT observed between the two radiologists
Day 1
Cumulative incidence of Breast cancer diagnosis
Time Frame: Month 24
Cumulative incidence of Breast cancer diagnosis among women with benign at after primary evaluation
Month 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 20, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 9, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 24, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P120121

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Standard mammography

Subscribe