- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07426809
Margin Optimisation Using Z-axis Assessment With Real-time Tomosynthesis (MOZART Study). (MOZART)
Breast-conserving surgery is commonly performed to remove early-stage breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). During surgery, the goal is to completely remove the tumour with a clear margin of normal tissue around it. If cancer cells are found at the edge of the removed tissue (a "positive margin"), patients may need a second operation (re-excision). Re-excision can delay further treatment, increase patient anxiety, and increase healthcare costs.
To help assess margins during surgery, surgeons use specimen imaging. Standard practice involves two-dimensional (2D) specimen mammography, usually performed in the radiology department. This requires temporary transfer of the specimen out of the operating theatre and provides limited depth information.
The MOZART study is evaluating whether three-dimensional (3D) digital breast tomosynthesis, performed in the operating theatre using the Mozart system, improves margin assessment compared to standard 2D specimen mammography.
Patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery at Beaumont Hospital who agree to participate will be randomly assigned (like flipping a coin) to one of two groups:
Standard 2D specimen mammography (current standard practice), or
3D digital breast tomosynthesis performed in theatre.
In both groups, the operating surgeon will review the images during surgery and decide whether additional tissue needs to be removed. The final margin status will be determined by routine laboratory analysis after surgery.
The main goal of this study is to compare the rate of positive margins between the two imaging methods. Other outcomes include the need for additional surgery, operating time, and overall workflow efficiency.
The results of this study may help determine whether intraoperative 3D imaging improves surgical outcomes and reduces the need for re-excision in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Below are ClinicalTrials.gov-ready versions of both sections. They follow plain-language guidance, avoid promotional tone, and avoid duplicating structured registry fields.
Brief Summary
(Plain-language, patient-facing; within 5,000 characters)
Breast-conserving surgery is commonly performed to remove early-stage breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). During surgery, the goal is to completely remove the tumour with a clear margin of normal tissue around it. If cancer cells are found at the edge of the removed tissue (a "positive margin"), patients may need a second operation (re-excision). Re-excision can delay further treatment, increase patient anxiety, and increase healthcare costs.
To help assess margins during surgery, surgeons use specimen imaging. Standard practice involves two-dimensional (2D) specimen mammography, usually performed in the radiology department. This requires temporary transfer of the specimen out of the operating theatre and provides limited depth information.
The MOZART study is evaluating whether three-dimensional (3D) digital breast tomosynthesis, performed in the operating theatre using the Mozart system, improves margin assessment compared to standard 2D specimen mammography.
Patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery at Beaumont Hospital who agree to participate will be randomly assigned (like flipping a coin) to one of two groups:
Standard 2D specimen mammography (current standard practice), or
3D digital breast tomosynthesis performed in theatre.
In both groups, the operating surgeon will review the images during surgery and decide whether additional tissue needs to be removed. The final margin status will be determined by routine laboratory analysis after surgery.
The main goal of this study is to compare the rate of positive margins between the two imaging methods. Other outcomes include the need for additional surgery, operating time, and overall workflow efficiency.
The results of this study may help determine whether intraoperative 3D imaging improves surgical outcomes and reduces the need for re-excision in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Detailed Description
(Technical, structured, avoids repeating registry fields; within 32,000 characters)
Background and Rationale
Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a standard surgical treatment for early-stage invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Achieving clear surgical margins is essential to minimise local recurrence risk and reduce the need for re-excision. Despite current intraoperative assessment techniques, reported positive margin rates range from 15-20%, and a substantial proportion of patients require additional surgery.
Intraoperative specimen imaging is used to guide margin assessment. Standard practice involves 2D specimen mammography performed in the radiology department. Limitations of this approach include:
Specimen transport outside the operating theatre Potential workflow delays Limited three-dimensional assessment of tumour-margin relationships Difficulty interpreting complex lesions or microcalcifications Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) provides three-dimensional imaging through multiple reconstructed slices. The Mozart 3D Specimen Radiography System enables intraoperative DBT imaging directly within the operating theatre. This may improve visualisation of margins and allow more accurate real-time surgical decision-making.
Prospective observational data suggest improved diagnostic accuracy with intraoperative DBT compared to standard specimen mammography. However, high-quality randomised controlled trial data are limited.
Study Design
The MOZART study is a prospective, single-centre, open-label, parallel-group randomised controlled trial conducted at Beaumont Hospital.
Eligible patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to:
Standard intraoperative 2D specimen mammography (control group), or
Intraoperative 3D digital breast tomosynthesis using the Mozart system (intervention group).
Randomisation will be computer-generated. Surgeons and participants will not be blinded due to the nature of the intervention. Histopathologists assessing final margin status and data analysts will be blinded to group allocation.
Intervention Procedures Control Group
Specimen imaging will be performed in the radiology department using standard 2D mammography. The operating surgeon will review images and determine whether additional excision is required.
Intervention Group
Specimen imaging will be performed in theatre using the Mozart 3D digital breast tomosynthesis system. The surgeon will assess reconstructed tomosynthesis images in real time and determine whether additional excision is required.
In both groups, standard surgical technique and postoperative management will not be altered.
Outcomes
The primary outcome is the rate of positive surgical margins on final histopathological assessment.
Positive margins are defined according to contemporary national and international guidance as:
Invasive carcinoma at or within 1 mm of the inked margin; or DCIS within 2 mm of the margin.
Secondary outcomes include:
Re-excision rate Operative time metrics Time from specimen removal to imaging review Theatre workflow efficiency Cost-effectiveness analysis
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Prof Arnold Hill, MB, BCh, BAO, MCh, FRCSI
- Phone Number: 018093000
- Email: adkhill@rcsi.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Aisling Hegarty, PhD
- Email: Aislinghegarty@rcsi.ie
Study Locations
-
-
Dublin
-
Beaumont, Dublin, Ireland, D09V2N0
- Recruiting
- Beaumont RCSI Cancer Centre
-
Contact:
- Aisling Hegarty, PhD
- Phone Number: 0035317977800
- Email: Aislinghegarty@rcsi.ie
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Female patients
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Diagnosis of primary invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)
- Planned breast-conserving surgery with curative intent
- No clinical or radiological evidence of distant metastatic disease at time of recruitment
- Able to provide written informed consent
- Fluent in English (spoken and written)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Evidence of metastatic (stage IV) breast cancer
- Planned mastectomy instead of breast-conserving surgery
- Prior ipsilateral breast cancer surgery for the current malignancy
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Participation in another interventional study that may affect surgical margin assessment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Standard 2D Speciman Mammography (Control)
Participants undergo intraoperative specimen imaging using standard two-dimensional (2D) specimen mammography performed in the radiology department following tumour excision.
The operating surgeon reviews the images intraoperatively to assess margin adequacy and determines whether additional excision is required prior to wound closure.
All other aspects of surgical care follow standard institutional practice.
|
Two-dimensional specimen mammography performed intraoperatively in the radiology department to assess surgical margins following breast-conserving surgery.
Images are reviewed by the operating surgeon to guide additional excision if indicated.
|
|
Experimental: 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (Mozart System Intervention)
Participants undergo intraoperative specimen imaging using three-dimensional (3D) digital breast tomosynthesis with the Mozart 3D Specimen Radiography System, performed directly in the operating theatre.
The operating surgeon reviews reconstructed tomosynthesis images in real time to assess margin adequacy and determine whether additional excision is required prior to wound closure.
All other aspects of surgical care remain unchanged.
|
Intraoperative digital breast tomosynthesis imaging performed in theatre using the Mozart 3D Specimen Radiography System (Kubtec).
The system generates reconstructed 3D images of the excised specimen to allow real-time assessment of surgical margins by the operating surgeon.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate f positive Surgical Margins
Time Frame: Within 4 weeks after index surgery (upon availability of final histopathology report)
|
Proportion of participants with positive margins on final histopathological assessment following breast-conserving surgery. A positive margin is defined as: Invasive carcinoma at or within 1 mm of the inked surgical margin, or Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) within 2 mm of the inked margin. Margin status will be determined by blinded histopathological evaluation of the surgical specimen. |
Within 4 weeks after index surgery (upon availability of final histopathology report)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Re-Excision Rate
Time Frame: Within 3 months after index surgery
|
Proportion of participants requiring return to theatre for re-excision surgery due to positive margins identified on final histopathology.
|
Within 3 months after index surgery
|
|
Time From Specimen Removal to Imaging Review
Time Frame: Intraoperative (day of surgery)
|
Time (in minutes) from surgical excision of the specimen to completion of intraoperative imaging review by the operating surgeon.
|
Intraoperative (day of surgery)
|
|
Time From Specimen Removal to Skin Closure
Time Frame: Intraoperative (day of surgery)
|
Time (in minutes) from surgical excision of the specimen to final skin closure.
|
Intraoperative (day of surgery)
|
|
Total Operative Time
Time Frame: Intraoperative (day of surgery)
|
Total duration of surgery measured in minutes from incision to skin closure.
|
Intraoperative (day of surgery)
|
|
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Time Frame: At study completion (after all participants have completed follow-up)
|
Comparative evaluation of theatre time costs, radiology utilisation, and re-operation rates between intervention and control groups.
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be calculated based on cost per margin-negative surgery achieved.
|
At study completion (after all participants have completed follow-up)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 25-61
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer
-
Baylor Breast Care CenterRecruitingBreast Cancer | Breast Neoplasm | Triple Negative Breast Cancer | Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms | HER2-positive Breast Cancer | Breast Cancer Stage II | Breast Cancer Female | Breast Cancer Stage III | Estrogen Receptor-positive Breast Cancer | Hormone Receptor-positive Breast Cancer | Breast Cancer InvasiveUnited States
-
Innocrin PharmaceuticalCompletedBreast Cancer | Advanced Breast Cancer | Metastatic Breast Cancer | Triple Negative Breast Cancer | Male Breast Cancer | ER+ Breast Cancer | Cancer of the BreastUnited States
-
Fred Hutchinson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedInflammatory Breast Cancer | Male Breast Cancer | Stage IV Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Estrogen Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | Estrogen Receptor-positive Breast Cancer | Progesterone Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | Progesterone Receptor-positive Breast CancerUnited States
-
Northwestern UniversityEisai Inc.UnknownMale Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Triple-negative Breast Cancer | Stage IA Breast Cancer | Stage IB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast Cancer | Estrogen Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | Progesterone Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | HER2-negative...United States
-
University of Colorado, DenverCompletedStage IV Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Stage IA Breast Cancer | Stage IB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast CancerUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedMale Breast Cancer | Stage IV Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Triple-negative Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast Cancer | Recurrent Breast Cancer | Estrogen Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | Progesterone Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | HER2-negative Breast CancerCanada
-
Mayo ClinicMarker Therapeutics, Inc.CompletedHER2-positive Breast Cancer | Male Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast CancerUnited States
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New JerseyActive, not recruitingStage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Triple-negative Breast Cancer | Stage IIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast Cancer | Estrogen Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | Progesterone Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | HER2-negative Breast CancerUnited States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedMale Breast Cancer | Stage IV Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Stage IA Breast Cancer | Stage IB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast Cancer | Recurrent Breast CancerUnited States
-
University of Central FloridaFlorida Department of HealthRecruitingBreast Cancer | Breast Cancer Female | Breast Cancer Diagnosis | Breast Cancer Survivors | Breast Cancer Detection | Breast Cancer AwarenessUnited States
Clinical Trials on Standard 2D Specimen Mammography
-
Fujifilm Medical Systems USA, Inc.Completed
-
Centre Oscar LambretCompletedBreast Cancer | 2D Mammography | 3D MammographyFrance
-
Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCSAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona; AULSS 9 Scaligera di Verona and other collaboratorsActive, not recruiting
-
GE HealthcareCompleted
-
Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, ItalyUnknown
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUnknownBreast Neoplasms | BRCA1 Protein | BRCA2 Protein | TomosynthesisFrance
-
Massachusetts General HospitalCompleted
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterCompletedBreast Cancer | Screening Mammography | Community Health WorkerUnited States
-
Norwegian Institute of Public HealthHelse Vest; Norwegian Cancer Society; Helse Midt-Norge; Helse NordRecruiting
-
GE HealthcareTerminatedBreast Cancer | Tumors, BreastFrance, United States