3D-printed Module-assisted Minimally Invasive Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement

November 18, 2016 updated by: Haibin Lin, The Affiliated Hospital of Putian University

3D-printed Module-assisted Minimally Invasive Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement: a Retrospective, Self-controlled, Open-label Clinical Trial

To explore the accuracy of 3D printed module assisted minimally invasive lumbar pedicle screw placement using Quandrant system, and verify its feasibility of reducing error rate of screw placement and postoperative complications.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

History and current related studies Pedicle screw fixation has been widely used in spinal surgery, such as spinal fractures, lumbar spondylolisthesis, scoliosis, lumbar spinal stenosis. However, difficulties in pedicle screw placement are unavoidable because of anatomical variations in the spinal structure and spinal degeneration. Consequently, the precise localization for screw placement is essential. If not, errors in screw placement will result in reduced strength or even failure of the internal fixation, which may lead to a series of injuries, including nerve root injury, dural sac tear, vascular injury and even spinal cord injury. To conclude, it is urgent to improve the accuracy of screw placement and reduce complications of screw placement in the pedicle screw fixation.

With the rapid adoption of digital medicine and 3D printing technology in orthopedic practice, 3D techniques, based on preoperative high-resolution CT scan data, can theoretically restore the three-dimensional structure of the bone. That is to say, the investigators can present a detailed description of the complex anatomical structure of the bone, to accurately make a preoperative plan and an intraoperative simulation. Numerous evidences have been achieved with digital three-dimensional reconstruction and 3D techniques to assist the posterior pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of spine lesions.

Adverse events Postoperative adverse events were recorded and reported to the Affiliated Hospital of Putian Hospital within 24 hours.

Proper therapeutic measures could be performed if the following adverse events occurred, including incision infection, back muscle pain, dural sac tear, vascular injury, nerve root injury, spinal cord injury, screw falling off and loosening.

Data collection, management, analysis, and open access Baseline data were collected at the day when the participants were enrolled in the study. Other data were collected preoperatively, intraoperatively, postoperatively and during the follow-up. All data were input using Epidata and saved electronically.

All data regarding this clinical study were preserved by the Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, China.

All data were statistically analyzed by professional statisticians who were responsible for completing an outcome analysis report that was submitted to the project manager who was responsible for completing a research report. An independent data monitoring committee was responsible for data monitoring and management throughout the entire trial.

Statistical analysis All data were statistically analyzed by statisticians using SPSS 19.0 software (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle.

Normally distributed measurement data were expressed as means, standard deviations, minimums, and maximums; non-normally distributed data were expressed as lower quartiles, medians, and upper quartiles.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Lumbar degenerative diseases as diagnosed by the criteria for diagnosis of lumbar degenerative diseases
  • Indications for internal fixation in the degenerative lumbar spine
  • Lumbar single segment or multi-segment lesions
  • Average age 63 years
  • Provision of the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lumbar spine tumors, lumbar tuberculosis, trauma fractures or joint disorders
  • Lumbar infection or acute inflammation in the other parts of the body
  • Unable to undergo lumbar surgery due to surgical contraindications (coagulation disorders) and poor cardiopulmonary function

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: 3D printed module
The patients underwent 3D printed module-assisted lumbar pedicle screw placement using the Quandrant system, aiming to restore the stability of the spine.
The patients underwent 3D printed module-assisted lumbar pedicle screw placement using the Quandrant system, aiming to restore the stability of the spine.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accurate rate of screw placement
Time Frame: during the operation
To assess whether the screw placement by 3D printed module navigation achieves the desired results. The higher value indicates the higher accuracy.
during the operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lumbar CT imaging
Time Frame: Baseline and month 6, month 24 after surgery
To observe the conditions of lumbar fixation.
Baseline and month 6, month 24 after surgery
Time of operation
Time Frame: during the operation
To evaluate the speed of surgery. The shorter operation time indicates that this method is easier to operate.
during the operation
Amount of intraoperative bleeding
Time Frame: during the operation
To evaluate the conditions of intraoperative blood loss. Less blood loss indicates the higher improvement in the surgical quality by this method being studied.
during the operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Haibin Lin, bachelor, The Affiliated Hospital of Putian University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 22, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 22, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2016

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe