Syncope Decision Aid for Emergency Care (SynDA)

SynDA: Syncope Decision Aid for Emergency Care

Syncope, or transient loss of consciousness/fainting, is a common emergency department (ED) complaint responsible for over 1 million ED visits yearly. Potential causes include benign conditions such as dehydration or vaso-vagal syncope. Rarely, syncope is the result of serious cardiac conditions. In older patients without a clear cause of syncope hospital admission is frequently initiated at very low risk thresholds, though there is little evidence that these admissions improve patient outcomes. These decisions are often made without significant patient input or discussion of reasonable alternatives. In this situation, a patient's values, preferences, and particular circumstances should be taken into account. This mutualistic approach to clinical management is referred to as Shared Decision-Making. Shared Decision-Making (SDM) is a joint process of choice selection between providers and patients in clinical scenarios where multiple reasonable management options exist. To improve syncope emergency care, the researchers can leverage recent advances in risk stratification to engage patients in SDM and deliver superior, patient-centered care.

This study will provide the groundwork for a larger, randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of the decision aid for management of low-risk syncope.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Setting:

Mount Sinai Hospital (MSH) has a 61-bed adult Emergency Department with a volume of over 100,000 patient visits/year or approximately 300 visits/day. MSH is a large academic tertiary care medical center located in East Harlem and serves a large black and Hispanic community.

Projected Recruitment: There are approximately 60 MSH ED visits for syncope per month of which 35 per month are by patients above age 30. Roughly half of these do not have a clear etiology of their syncope discovered in the ED. The researchers project that of the 17 potentially eligible patients per month, three will be successfully enrolled for a projected 72 patient enrollees at the completion of the 24-month recruitment period. The PI, clinical research coordinators, and SRAs will monitor the real-time electronic tracking system for all ED patients and will identify any patient over age 30 with a chief complaint of syncope or loss of consciousness.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency Department patient
  • Age 30 years or above
  • Chief complaint of syncope
  • Capacity to make medical decisions
  • Speak and read English
  • Working phone number and fixed address

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Altered Mental Status
  • Cognitive Impairment
  • Serious acute diagnosis:

    (e.g. clinically significant cardiac dysrhythmia, structural heart disease, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, arterial dissection, serious infection, ectopic pregnancy, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or stroke.)

  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Inability to read or speak English
  • Major communication barrier
  • Lack of phone number or fixed address
  • Too high risk as per physician judgment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SynDA
The research coordinator will print the appropriate version of the SynDA based on the patient's individualized risk score and the corresponding estimated probability of a serious medical event within 30 days.
SynDA is a paper-based, personalized decision aid which gives information to patients about their medical condition (i.e. syncope), future risk, and options for care. It is written in lay language and aims to create an informed conversation between a patient and their ED provider.
Other Names:
  • Syncope Decision Aid
No Intervention: Control
Patients in the control arm will receive usual emergency care pertaining to syncope.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants at End of Study
Time Frame: Two years
Feasibility of the study will be measured by the number of participants successfully enrolled at the end of the study period.
Two years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Knowledge
Time Frame: Within 2 hours post ED disposition on Day 1
One brief post-encounter survey will be given to the patient to assess their knowledge surrounding syncope and their satisfaction with their care during the ED visit. Scores full range is 0-9, higher score indicates more knowledge
Within 2 hours post ED disposition on Day 1
Decisional Conflict Scale
Time Frame: Within 2 hours post ED disposition on Day 1
Decisional quality will be measured by administering the Decisional Conflict Scale to all patients after disposition decision has been made. The decisional conflict scale total score range from 0 (no decisional conflict) to 10 (extremely high decisional conflict).
Within 2 hours post ED disposition on Day 1
Utilization Outcomes
Time Frame: Day 1 and 30 day follow up period
Number of patients admitted to the hospital or sent to observation unit at index visit and number of patients admitted to the hospital, or had an office visit or during 30-day follow-up period
Day 1 and 30 day follow up period
Number of Participants With Repeat Visits to the ED
Time Frame: 30-day follow-up period
Number of participants with repeat visits to the ED during 30-day follow-up period
30-day follow-up period
Participants With New Significant Clinical Diagnosis
Time Frame: at 30 days
Number of participants with clinical diagnosis at 30 days after index visit to the ED
at 30 days
Number of Diagnostic Testing
Time Frame: Day 1
Number of diagnostic test (which may include but not limited to exercise stress testing, echocardiography, computed tomography scans) performed
Day 1
OPTION-5 Scale
Time Frame: up to 2 years
The degree of patient involvement in the disposition decision as measured by the OPTION (observing patient involvement in decision making) scale. The OPTION-5 scale is a brief, 5-item instrument used by a trained observer to measure the degree of patient involvement in clinical decision-making and has demonstrated validity and reliability. Full scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher levels of patient involvement.
up to 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Lynne Richardson, MD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 9, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

January 9, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 22, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Syncope

3
Subscribe