Initial Ventilation Strategy for Adult Immunocompromised Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure

December 2, 2016 updated by: Yi Li, MD, Peking Union Medical College Hospital
VENIM is a multicenter, open-label, parallel-group randomized controlled trial of studying the initial ventilation strategy for adult immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The VENIM is a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effects of NIV compared with IMV in adult immunocompromised patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory failure (ARF). Patients who meet the indications for both ventilatory supports will be included. The intervention will consist of randomly allocation, treatment with NIV or IMV, concomitant medication. Primary outcome is 30-day hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes include in-hospital mortality, length of stay in hospital, improvement of oxygenation, nosocomial infections, seven-day organ failure, adverse events of intervention, et al. Subgroups with different disease severity, causes of immunodeficiency and types of ARF will also be analyzed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

238

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult (18 years old ≤ age ≤ 80 years old) immunocompromised patients admitted to hospital with moderate to severe ARF diagnosed within the last 72 hours, which meets the indications for ventilatory support.
  • Patients are considered as moderate to severe ARF when the ratio of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) is between 85 and 170 while the patient is breathing oxygen through a Venturi mask, or clinically diagnosed as the following:

    1. 30 mmHg < PaO2 < 50 mmHg on room air;
    2. Clinical evidence of respiratory distress (intercostal recession, polypnea >35/min or dyspnea at rest).
  • Patients are considered as immunocompromised when clinically diagnosed as at least one of the following:

    1. HIV infection;
    2. Hematologic malignancy or solid tumor under chemotherapy;
    3. Solid organ or stem cell transplant;
    4. Long-term (>30 days) or high dose steroids (>1 mg/kg/d prednisone equivalent) usage and/or any other immunosuppressive drugs;
    5. Neutropenia (defined as a neutrocyte count of < 0.50×109/L) showing for at least 48 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age<18 or >80 years old;
  • Partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2) > 50 mmHg or arterial pH < 7.20;
  • PaO2/FiO2 >170 or PaO2/FiO2< 85;
  • Patients have been treated with NIV or IMV within 30 days.
  • NIV is contraindicated or IMV is definitely indicated, including PaO2/FiO2< 85, respiratory arrest, hemodynamic instability, inability to fit the face mask, pneumothorax, vomiting, development of airway bleeding, inability to protect the airway, or copious respiratory secretions;
  • Comorbided with other severe diseases, including New York Heart Association functional class ≥ II, valvular heart disease, dilated cardiomyopathy, cardiogenic pulmonary edema, implanted cardiac pacemaker, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, or cardiac surgery within the previous 3 months; systolic arterial pressure <90 mmHg after optimal fluid therapy; history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma; impaired consciousness (Glasgow Coma Scale score <13); postoperative acute respiratory failure; pregnancy or breastfeeding;
  • Lack of consent, do-not-intubate decision, and any other situations where obvious bias are expected

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Noninvasive mechanical ventilation
Patients in this group will receive Noninvasive mechanical ventilation as the initial mechanical ventilation (MV) strategy, irrespective of whether Invasive mechanical ventilation is used later during the following treatment.
Noninvasive mechanical ventilation will be delivered to the patient through a mask. The mask will be adjusted and connected to a ventilation system.
Active Comparator: Invasive mechanical ventilation
Patients in this group will receive Invasive mechanical ventilation as the initial MV strategy, irrespective of whether Noninvasive mechanical ventilation is used later during the following treatment.
Invasive mechanical ventilation will be initially performed by using the volume controlled mode, and could be adjusted to pressure controlled mode or other modes based on clinical situation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
30-day all-cause mortality
Time Frame: the 30th day after patient inclusion in the study
the 30th day after patient inclusion in the study

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
In-hospital mortality
Time Frame: through study study completion, an average of 2 years
through study study completion, an average of 2 years
Length of stay in hospital
Time Frame: through study study completion, an average of 2 years
through study study completion, an average of 2 years
Length of mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: through study study completion, an average of 2 years
through study study completion, an average of 2 years
Nosocomial infections
Time Frame: through study study completion, an average of 2 years
through study study completion, an average of 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

December 6, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 6, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe