Vasopressin Plasma Concentrations in Patients Receiving Exogenous Vasopressin Infusion for Septic Shock

January 29, 2019 updated by: The Cleveland Clinic

Vasopressin Plasma Concentrations in Responders and Non-responders to Exogenous Vasopressin Infusion in Patients With Septic Shock

This is a prospective observational cohort trial evaluating a single plasma vasopressin concentration in patients receiving exogenous, adjunctive vasopressin for septic shock. The trial is designed to determine whether plasma vasopressin concentration influences the likelihood of hemodynamic response to exogenous vasopressin therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Vasopressin is an endogenous hormone that decreases serum osmolarity and increases blood pressure. As a part of the stress response to hypotension, vasopressin is released from the posterior pituitary and leads to vasoconstriction through agonism of the vascular vasopressin V1 receptor. In patients with septic shock, endogenous vasopressin levels are initially elevated but quickly fall to levels at or below those of normal physiology (1.4-3.6pg/mL) because of the depletion of endogenous store. Sharshar et al. evaluated two sets of patients with septic shock, one of which was evaluated earlier in the septic shock course (3.6 ± 2.3 hours, n=18) and one evaluated at a later time from shock onset (mean 38.7 ± 28.4 hours, n=44). The group of patients evaluated earlier in their septic shock course were more likely than patients evaluated later to have elevated (>3.6 pg/mL) plasma vasopressin levels (88.9% vs. 38.6%, respectively). Similarly, a case series evaluated single vasopressin levels in three patients with septic shock, one of whom was in the first day of shock onset and two of whom were in the fifth and sixth day of shock onset. The patient in the earlier stages of septic shock had a plasma vasopressin level that was increased (16pg/mL), while the two patients in the later stages of septic shock had decreased plasma vasopressin levels (1.6 and 1.8pg/mL). The exact timing of when patients transition from having elevated endogenous vasopressin levels to having normal levels of vasopressin is currently unclear. In a clinical trial enrolling patients within the first 12 hours of shock onset, median endogenous vasopressin levels were 3.5 pg/mL (interquartile range 1.8, 5.3 pg/mL; n=54). Some have even hypothesized that vasopressin levels rise before clinical hypotension is apparent and the decline in vasopressin levels is associated with the onset of apparent hypotension. Further complicating this issue, endogenous vasopressin levels have been shown to be lower in patients with septic shock compared to other shock etiologies such cardiogenic shock (3.1 ± 1pg/mL in patients with septic shock vs. 22.7 ± 2.2pg/mL in patients with cardiogenic shock, p<0.001). The etiology of this discrepancy in endogenous vasopressin response by shock type is unclear, but a "relative deficiency" of vasopressin is theorized to exist in patients with septic shock.

In light of these findings, exogenous arginine vasopressin (AVP) has been added to exogenous catecholamines to increase mean arterial pressure (MAP) and to decrease catecholamine requirements in patients with vasodilatory shock. The use of AVP for these purposes in patients with septic shock is in keeping with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines. In the Vasopressin and Septic Shock Trial (VASST), low-dose AVP was infused at a rate of 0.01-0.03 units/min in combination with norepinephrine to achieve a goal MAP of 65-75mmHg. Plasma vasopressin levels in patients receiving AVP were elevated at 6 (68.3pg/mL) and 24 hours (90.5pg/mL) in comparison to patients not receiving AVP (3.0pg/mL at baseline with no significant change at 6 or 24 hours). Association of plasma vasopressin levels with hemodynamic response to AVP, though, was not evaluated in VASST.

Concomitant corticosteroid use has been observed to decrease the total dose of administered AVP, to increase the proportion of patients alive and free of vasopressors at day 7, to increase plasma vasopressin concentrations by 33% at 6 hours and 67% at 24 hours, and to lead to lower 28- and 90-day mortality (35.9% vs. 44.7%, p=0.03 and 42.5% vs. 55.5%, p=0.01, respectively) than in those that received AVP alone. These findings generated the hypothesis that concomitant administration of AVP and corticosteroids results in increased plasma vasopressin levels versus AVP administration alone, leading to positive clinical outcomes in septic shock. Furthering the hypothesis that plasma vasopressin levels may influence outcomes in septic shock, genetic differences in leucyl/cystinyl aminopeptidase, the primary vasopressin metabolic enzyme, have been associated with more rapid vasopressin clearance, lower plasma vasopressin levels, and increased mortality in patients with septic shock. However, a study evaluating vasopressin plasma concentrations in patients with multiple shock types not administered exogenous AVP observed higher vasopressin concentrations in those with hemodynamic dysfunction than in those without (mean 14.1 ± 26 vs. 8.7 ± 10.8pg/mL, respectively) regardless of shock type. This suggests that plasma vasopressin concentration may not directly correlate with MAP.

The impact of body mass (which may influence vasopressin levels when fixed-dose AVP is administered) on hemodynamic response to AVP has been inconsistent. Studies have observed a negative correlation between BMI and change in MAP at 6 hours and a correlation between increasing weight-adjusted AVP dose and reduction in catecholamine requirements, suggesting that hemodynamic response to AVP is associated with body mass. In contrast, a third study observed no association between BMI and AVP dose required to meet goal MAP when AVP was administered as the sole vasopressor. Finally, a fourth found an inverse correlation between BMI and APACHE II-adjusted 28-day mortality, regardless of the fact that overweight and obese patients received less weight-adjusted vasopressin than underweight or normal weight patients. This suggests that while BMI may impact plasma vasopressin concentration, the change in vasopressin concentration may not have an impact on clinical outcomes.

Recently, a retrospective study was completed at the Cleveland Clinic to evaluate predictors of hemodynamic response to fixed-dose AVP in patients with septic shock. Patients were considered to be responders to AVP if a decrease in catecholamine dose was achieved with MAP≥65mmHg at 6 hours. The overall response rate to fixed-dose vasopressin was 45.4%. Within this study, only admission to surgical or neurosciences intensive care units (ICU) vs. medical ICU and lower lactate level were associated with increasing chance of response to AVP (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.175-2.463, p=0.0049 and OR 0.925, 95% CI 0.887-0.965, p=0.0003, respectively) on logistic regression. Factors previously found to impact vasopressin levels (such as concomitant use of corticosteroids) were not associated with hemodynamic response. However, plasma vasopressin levels were not evaluated in this retrospective study.

The relationship between plasma vasopressin concentration and hemodynamic response in patients receiving AVP is unclear. While concomitant corticosteroids have been observed to increase plasma vasopressin concentrations, corticosteroids themselves have been shown to shorten time in septic shock, possibly confounding any relationship between plasma vasopressin concentration and hemodynamic response in patients receiving both agents. As previously mentioned, data correlating body mass with hemodynamic response have been inconsistent, but vasopressin levels in patients receiving fixed dose AVP seem to be lower in patients with higher body mass. The recent study at the Cleveland Clinic found no association between factors associated with increased plasma vasopressin level and hemodynamic response. Together, these data call into question the idea of a dose-response relationship between plasma vasopressin concentration and hemodynamic response. This study seeks to prospectively evaluate whether plasma vasopressin levels are associated with improved rates of hemodynamic response to fixed-dose AVP therapy in patients with septic shock.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with septic shock that are receiving fixed-dose exogenous vasopressin as an adjunct to catecholamines

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with septic shock as defined by The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock
  • Patients ≥18 years of age
  • Treatment with exogenous vasopressin, as ordered by the primary medical team, at a constant infusion rate for at least 3 hours as an adjunctive vasopressor to catecholamine therapy
  • Admission to a medical, surgical, or neurosciences intensive care unit
  • Presence of a central venous catheter or arterial line (as determined by the primary medical team)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients treated with vasopressin for indications other than septic shock
  • Patients administered vasopressin that is titrated within the first 3 hours
  • Patients receiving vasopressin as the sole vasoactive therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Hemodynamic responders
Those with a mean arterial pressure of at least 65mmHg and a decrease in catecholamine dose (in norepinephrine equivalents) from initiation of exogenous vasopressin therapy to the time of the sample collection used for analysis of plasma vasopressin concentration
Hemodynamic non-responders
Those without a mean arterial pressure of at least 65mmHg and/or a decrease in catecholamine dose (in norepinephrine equivalents) from initiation of exogenous vasopressin therapy to the time of the sample collection used for analysis of plasma vasopressin concentration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Plasma vasopressin concentration
Time Frame: 3-6 hours from initiation of exogenous vasopressin administration
3-6 hours from initiation of exogenous vasopressin administration

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mean arterial pressure
Time Frame: Analyzed at time of vasopressin blood draw, 3-6 hours from initiation of exogenous vasopressin administration
Analyzed at time of vasopressin blood draw, 3-6 hours from initiation of exogenous vasopressin administration
Catecholamine dose in norepinephrine equivalents
Time Frame: Analyzed at time of vasopressin blood draw, 3-6 hours from initiation of exogenous vasopressin administration
Analyzed at time of vasopressin blood draw, 3-6 hours from initiation of exogenous vasopressin administration
ICU mortality
Time Frame: Analyzed at ICU discharge, up to 1 year
Analyzed at ICU discharge, up to 1 year
In-hospital mortality
Time Frame: Analyzed at hospital discharge, up to 1 year
Analyzed at hospital discharge, up to 1 year
Vasopressor-free days
Time Frame: Day 14
Day 14
ICU-free days
Time Frame: Day 14
Day 14
Acute kidney injury
Time Frame: Analyzed at ICU discharge, up to 1 year
Analyzed at ICU discharge, up to 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

The Cleveland Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

January 9, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 31, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 16-1254

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Septic Shock

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Cyprus

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe