- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03051100
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Bempedoic Acid (ETC-1002) 180mg, Ezetimibe 10mg, and Atorvastatin 20 mg Triplet Therapy in Patients With Elevated LDL-C
March 20, 2020 updated by: Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Triplet Therapy With Bempedoic Acid (ETC 1002) 180 mg, Ezetimibe 10 mg, and Atorvastatin 20 mg in Patients With Elevated LDL C
The purpose of this study is to determine if triplet therapy with bempedoic acid (ETC-1002) 180mg, ezetimibe 10mg, and atorvastatin 20mg is effective and safe versus placebo in patients with elevated LDL cholesterol.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
63
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Champaign, Illinois, United States, 61820
- PMG Research of Christie Clinic
-
-
North Carolina
-
Cary, North Carolina, United States, 27518
- PMG Research of Cary
-
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28209
- PMG Research of Charlotte
-
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28277
- Sensenbrenner Primary Care
-
Hickory, North Carolina, United States, 28601
- PMG Research of Hickory
-
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27609
- PMG Research of Raleigh
-
Rocky Mount, North Carolina, United States, 27804
- PMG Research of Rocky Mount
-
Salisbury, North Carolina, United States, 28144
- PMG Research Salisbury
-
Wilmington, North Carolina, United States, 28401
- PMG Research of Wilmington
-
-
South Carolina
-
Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, United States, 29464
- PMG Research of Charleston
-
-
Virginia
-
Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States, 23451
- Hampton Roads Center for Clinical Research
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Fasting LDL-cholesterol between 130 - 189 mg/dL at screening following washout of all LDL-C-lowering drugs and nutritional supplements
- Men and nonpregnant, nonlactating women
- Sufficiently stable and suitable to undergo washout of all LDL-C-lowering drugs and nutritional supplements for 12 weeks
Exclusion Criteria:
- Fasting blood triglycerides greater than or equal to 400 mg/dL
- Body Mass Index (BMI) greater than 50 kg/m2
- History of clinically significant cardiovascular disease
- History of type 1 or type 2 diabetes
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: TRIPLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Triplet Therapy
Bempedoic acid 180 mg, ezetimibe 10 mg, and atorvastatin 20 mg taken orally, daily.
|
bempedoic acid 180 mg
Other Names:
ezetimibe 10 mg
Other Names:
atorvastatin 20 mg
Other Names:
|
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: placebo
Matching placebos taken orally, daily.
|
placebo
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 6
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 6
|
Percent change from Baseline is calculated as the ([post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value] divided by the Baseline value ) x 100.
Baseline is defined as the mean of the values from Week -1 (Screening Visit 2) and predose Day 1/Week 0 (Treatment Visit 1).
Percent change from Baseline in LDL-C was analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment group as a factor and Baseline value as a covariate.
Missing LDL-C values were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF), with only post-Baseline values carried forward.
If LDL-C was measured (i.e., if TG was >400 mg/dL or LDL-C was <50 mg/dL), the measured values were used in the analysis.
|
Baseline; Week 6
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameters at Week 6
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 6
|
Percent change from Baseline is calculated as the ([post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value] divided by the Baseline value ) x 100.
Baseline is defined as the mean of the values from Week -1 (Screening Visit 2) and predose Day 1/Week 0 (Treatment Visit 1).
Baseline apolipoprotein B (apoB) was measured only at predose/Day 1. Percent change from Baseline was analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment group as a factor and Baseline value as a covariate.
Missing values were imputed using LOCF, with only post-Baseline values carried forward.
non-HDL-C, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
|
Baseline; Week 6
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) at Week 6
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 6
|
Percent change is calculated as the ([post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value] divided by the Baseline value ) x 100.
Baseline is defined as the predose Day 1/Week 0 (Treatment Visit 1) value.
If only one value is available either at Week -1 (Screening Visit 2) or Week 0 (Treatment Visit 1), then that value is used as Baseline.
Missing values were imputed using LOCF, with only post-Baseline values carried forward.
|
Baseline; Week 6
|
|
Number of Participants With LDL-C <70 mg/dL at Week 6
Time Frame: Week 6
|
Analysis was based on LOCF values.
If LDL-C was measured (i.e., if TG was >400 mg/dL or LDL-C was <50 mg/dL), the measured values were used in the analysis.
|
Week 6
|
|
Number of Participants With LDL-C Reduction ≥50% From Baseline at Week 6
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 6
|
If LDL-C was measured (i.e., if TG was >400 mg/dL or LDL-C was <50 mg/dL), the measured values were used in the analysis.
|
Baseline; Week 6
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Pinkosky SL, Newton RS, Day EA, Ford RJ, Lhotak S, Austin RC, Birch CM, Smith BK, Filippov S, Groot PHE, Steinberg GR, Lalwani ND. Liver-specific ATP-citrate lyase inhibition by bempedoic acid decreases LDL-C and attenuates atherosclerosis. Nat Commun. 2016 Nov 28;7:13457. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13457.
- Bilen O, Ballantyne CM. Bempedoic Acid (ETC-1002): an Investigational Inhibitor of ATP Citrate Lyase. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2016 Oct;18(10):61. doi: 10.1007/s11883-016-0611-4.
- Thompson PD, MacDougall DE, Newton RS, Margulies JR, Hanselman JC, Orloff DG, McKenney JM, Ballantyne CM. Treatment with ETC-1002 alone and in combination with ezetimibe lowers LDL cholesterol in hypercholesterolemic patients with or without statin intolerance. J Clin Lipidol. 2016 May-Jun;10(3):556-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2015.12.025. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
- Ballantyne CM, McKenney JM, MacDougall DE, Margulies JR, Robinson PL, Hanselman JC, Lalwani ND. Effect of ETC-1002 on Serum Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Hypercholesterolemic Patients Receiving Statin Therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jun 15;117(12):1928-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.03.043. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
- Thompson PD, Rubino J, Janik MJ, MacDougall DE, McBride SJ, Margulies JR, Newton RS. Use of ETC-1002 to treat hypercholesterolemia in patients with statin intolerance. J Clin Lipidol. 2015 May-Jun;9(3):295-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
January 19, 2017
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
June 1, 2017
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
July 5, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 9, 2017
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 9, 2017
First Posted (ACTUAL)
February 13, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
April 3, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 20, 2020
Last Verified
March 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Metabolic Diseases
- Lipid Metabolism Disorders
- Hyperlipidemias
- Dyslipidemias
- Hypercholesterolemia
- Hypoglycemic Agents
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Antimetabolites
- Anticholesteremic Agents
- Hypolipidemic Agents
- Lipid Regulating Agents
- Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
- Atorvastatin
- Ezetimibe
- 8-hydroxy-2,2,14,14-tetramethylpentadecanedioic acid
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1002-038
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.