The FIGHT-RP1 Study (FIGHT-RP1)

September 15, 2022 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

A Phase 1 Open Label Dose Ranging Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) in Patients With Retinitis Pigmentosa (FIGHT-RP1 Study)

Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP) is a devastating eye disease and at present there are no known treatment options that can alter the rate of vision loss. In a series of studies in animal models, the effects of exposing cones in the periphery of the retina to a large excess of oxygen results in progressive oxidative damage to cone photoreceptors and cone cell death. Compared to control patients, those with RP showed significant reduction in the reduced to oxidized glutathione ratio (GSH/GSSG) in aqueous humor and a significant increase in protein carbonyl content. This demonstration of oxidative stress and oxidative damage in the eyes of patients with RP, suggests that oxidative damage-induced cone cell death in animal models of RP may translate to humans with RP and support the hypotheses that (1) potent antioxidants will promote cone survival and function in patients with RP and (2) aqueous GSH/GSSG ratio and carbonyl content on proteins provide useful biomarkers of disease activity in this patient population. Orally administered N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) has been found to be a particularly effective antioxidant that promotes prolonged cone survival and maintenance of cone function in a mouse model of RP. There is good rationale to test the effect of NAC in patients with RP. The first step is to test different dosing regimens to identify the lowest dose that is able to restore aqueous GSH/GSSG ratio and reduce carbonyl adducts on aqueous proteins.

In patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, polymorphisms within the TOLLIP gene were found to influence outcomes of NAC-treated patients. The product of the TOLLIP gene, toll-interacting protein, is an inhibitory adaptor protein downstream of toll-like receptors, mediators of innate and adaptive immunity. The identification of the influence of TOLLIP polymorphisms on the effect of NAC in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis provides the rationale for collecting DNA and genotyping the same single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the current trial. In addition to this candidate gene genetic analysis, patient RNA will be collected and banked for future transcriptome analysis. The rationale for this is to identify gene expression changes that modify disease progression in RP. There is substantial variability in the rate of progression among patients with RP. A patient who loses all vision early in life can have a sibling with the same mutation who maintains vision into advanced age. This suggests that modifier genes can have a major impact on cone survival. This study will test the hypothesis that the level of expression of gene products that contribute to the antioxidant defense system may influence cone cell death and hence the rate of loss of visual field. It is also possible that gene expression differences may contribute to differences in response to NAC. For these reasons collecting RNA samples from patients will allow next-generation sequencing in the future to understand the transcriptome background on which the study intervention has been performed.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All subjects must meet the following criteria to be eligible for study entry:

  • Signed informed consent and authorization of use and disclosure of protected health information
  • Age >18 years
  • Patients diagnosed with RP by the investigators, based on clinical phenotype and diagnostic tests

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be ineligible for study entry:

  • Patients with concurrent retinal pathologies that result in vision loss, including but not limited to retinal vein occlusion, diabetic retinopathy and neovascular age-related macular degeneration. If one eye does not have any retinal pathology other than RP, it may be enrolled in the study.
  • Patients with uncontrolled arterial hypertension defined as diastolic blood pressure > 95 mm Hg or systolic blood pressure > 160 mm Hg despite medical therapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental Arm (carbonyl content >0.6, GSH/GSSG <3)
Subjects with RP will be enrolled in the experimental arm if they have a high carbonyl content (>0.6) and a reduced GSH/GSSG ratio (<3.0) in the aqueous.
Oral tablets of N-acetyl-cysteine
Experimental: Exploratory Arm (carbonyl content <0.6, GSH/GSSG >3)
Subjects with RP who don't have a high carbonyl content (>0.6) and a reduced GSH/GSSG ratio (<3.0) but otherwise are good candidates for the study will be enrolled in the exploratory arm.
Oral tablets of N-acetyl-cysteine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of safety and tolerability of N-Acetylcysteine including incidence and severity of systemic and ocular adverse events (AEs) and changes from baseline vital signs and physical examination.
Time Frame: Up to 10 months
Assessment of safety and tolerability of N-Acetylcysteine including incidence and severity of systemic and ocular adverse events (AEs) and changes from baseline vital signs and physical examination.
Up to 10 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline aqueous and serum carbonyl content and GSH/GSSG ratio at 1 month after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine .
Time Frame: 1 month after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
1 month after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline aqueous and serum carbonyl content and GSH/GSSG ratio at 2 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine .
Time Frame: 2 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
2 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline aqueous and serum carbonyl content and GSH/GSSG ratio at 3 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine .
Time Frame: 3 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
3 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline aqueous and serum carbonyl content and GSH/GSSG ratio at 4 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine .
Time Frame: 4 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
4 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline aqueous and serum carbonyl content and GSH/GSSG ratio at 5 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine .
Time Frame: 5 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
5 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline aqueous and serum carbonyl content and GSH/GSSG ratio at 6 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine .
Time Frame: 6 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
6 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline aqueous and serum carbonyl content and GSH/GSSG ratio at 7 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine .
Time Frame: 7 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
7 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline aqueous and serum carbonyl content and GSH/GSSG ratio at 8 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine .
Time Frame: 8 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
8 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline aqueous and serum carbonyl content and GSH/GSSG ratio at 9 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine .
Time Frame: 9 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
9 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 6 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Time Frame: 6 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
6 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline central retinal sensitivity by microperimetry 3 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Time Frame: 3 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
3 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline central retinal sensitivity by microperimetry 6 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Time Frame: 6 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
6 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline central retinal sensitivity by microperimetry 9 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Time Frame: 9 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
9 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline ellipsoid zone (EZ) width by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) 6 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Time Frame: 6 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
6 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline aqueous levels of N-Acetylcysteine
Time Frame: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
Change from baseline plasma levels of N-Acetylcysteine
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine
3 and 6 months after initiation of N-Acetylcysteine

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 11, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

February 11, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

February 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe